Olympic boxing

Started by winghalfback, August 02, 2016, 01:54:24 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

macdanger2

In fairness to the Russian, he was embarrassed with it himself

moysider

Quote from: yellowcard on August 15, 2016, 11:55:18 PM
Is there any grounds for appeal for the Kazakh? Better judges than me are saying it was Roy Jones embarrassingly bad. The Russian was pummelled yet got the decision.

What would their grounds for appeal be though? I think there has been appeals before but on technical grounds. Like a boxer getting a warning but judges not taking warning into account.
This just looks a bit sinister. A good nobbling job by the Russians is my guess.

yellowcard

Quote from: moysider on August 16, 2016, 12:08:08 AM
Quote from: yellowcard on August 15, 2016, 11:55:18 PM
Is there any grounds for appeal for the Kazakh? Better judges than me are saying it was Roy Jones embarrassingly bad. The Russian was pummelled yet got the decision.

What would their grounds for appeal be though? I think there has been appeals before but on technical grounds. Like a boxer getting a warning but judges not taking warning into account.
This just looks a bit sinister. A good nobbling job by the Russians is my guess.

Against crooked judges. I haven't seen one commentator make a logical case for the Russian having won the fight and yet all 3 judges scored the fight in his favour. I smell a rat there. Apparently a Japanese appealed a decision in London in 2012 and got the decision overturned, doubt anything will happen here but it was the worst decision I think I have seen in boxing for some time. The crowd reaction and that of the Russian boxer said it all.

yellowcard

One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

moysider

Quote from: yellowcard on August 16, 2016, 12:34:45 AM
One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

Oh dear! Hopefully he was the one that went with the Russian.

In the London bout the Japanese fighter was behind after 2 rounds but knocked his opponent down 5 times in round 3 and he had also been awarded two-point penalty. The Kazak doesn t have those kind of grounds for appeal?

Very unlikely that they would reverse a decision and send the judges home.

yellowcard

Quote from: moysider on August 16, 2016, 12:47:12 AM
Quote from: yellowcard on August 16, 2016, 12:34:45 AM
One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

Oh dear! Hopefully he was the one that went with the Russian.

In the London bout the Japanese fighter was behind after 2 rounds but knocked his opponent down 5 times in round 3 and he had also been awarded two-point penalty. The Kazak doesn t have those kind of grounds for appeal?

Very unlikely that they would reverse a decision and send the judges home.

Yes, I don't expect anything to happen in terms of overturning the decision but it puts a massive cloud over the boxing competition in general. The only way the Kazakh was ever going to win that fight was by knocking him out and even when that looked likely in round 3 the referee intervened.

ashman

A disgrace the Kazakh blaggarded and to be fair to the Russian lad he seemed embarrassed .

moysider

Quote from: ashman on August 16, 2016, 12:55:35 AM
A disgrace the Kazakh blaggarded and to be fair to the Russian lad he seemed embarrassed .

It stinks and whatever shenanigans was behind that the Russian lad just a pawn.

It will be interesting to see how Russians do in other events where medals are decided by 'judges' rather than times and distance thrown. 

Main Street

Quote from: moysider on August 16, 2016, 12:47:12 AM
Quote from: yellowcard on August 16, 2016, 12:34:45 AM
One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

Oh dear! Hopefully he was the one that went with the Russian.


You mean hopefully he was the one who went with the Kazakh??
Anyway. it was an unanimous decision.
What does it cost to buy such a decision?

moysider

Quote from: Main Street on August 16, 2016, 01:37:14 AM
Quote from: moysider on August 16, 2016, 12:47:12 AM
Quote from: yellowcard on August 16, 2016, 12:34:45 AM
One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

Oh dear! Hopefully he was the one that went with the Russian.


You mean hopefully he was the one who went with the Kazakh??
Anyway. it was an unanimous decision.
What does it cost to buy such a decision?

A Rolex maybe?

Yeah. I meant to say the Kazak but seeing it was unanimous it looks like Paddy got a Rolex as well.

Declan

Irish judge Michael Gallagher scored last two rounds of that heavyweight final to Tischenko. Someone needs to ask him to explain it alright

Makes you wonder how Conlan will get on against the Russian.

Milltown Row2

 :'(
Quote from: Declan on August 16, 2016, 08:09:26 AM
Irish judge Michael Gallagher scored last two rounds of that heavyweight final to Tischenko. Someone needs to ask him to explain it alright

Makes you wonder how Conlan will get on against the Russian.

Would need 3 Ukrainian judges to win that..... As 3 Irish judges would be hopeless
None of us are getting out of here alive, so please stop treating yourself like an after thought.

JimStynes

This olympics gets worse every day.

Bord na Mona man

Pat Hickey was  backing the Russians recently over the suspensions controversy.


Dinny Breen

Quote from: yellowcard on August 16, 2016, 12:34:45 AM
One of the judges listed before the fight started was Irish too, why are we always involved!!

Because we love a bribe, we love not paying taxes, we love brown envelopes, we love strokes and we love getting one overs, we love getting our mates on quangos, we love skipping queues, we love knowing a mate who knows someone, we love short-cuts, we love by-passing process, we love a rouge....
#newbridgeornowhere