RG at arms length

[93-DY-SAM]

Lads, stop entertaining this fella. It's as simple as that.

[Hand of God]

Forget defamation proceedings, was there ever a robust statement released by RG outright denying the allegations? I know if I was completely innocent of something I was accused of, that would be my first course of action.

When he threatened the legal action against Burns he said he "categorically denied" the allegations.

The other thing is costs, have you any idea how much it takes for legal procedures. I know of one friend that is currently paying £500 a month, there will be other additional fees but that is just to keep them, he's currently over two years paying that!

There's clearing your name and then there is being homeless with kids..

As for this one question on credibility of mrs Gallagher's post on fb, it could be true it could be false and maybe the answer could be somewhere in between, I believe she wrote what she felt was true.

I would never though take any post on social media as fully true unless there are other factors which back it up. In this case I've not seen the evidence or other factors, nor do I want to. This family have to live with the constant consequences of whatever happened.

Burns has extended the grief/trauma and taken a role that's not within his remit as I see the GAA president should be doing.

Nonsensical post. You are talking about Gallagher ending up homeless with kids through taking a legal case against his wife.

He is currently taking a legal action against the GAA. He doesn't seem to be worried about being homeless with kids when it comes to allowing him to be involved in the GAA so it would seem odd that he would if it came to clearing his name.

I feel most normal people would be more worried about not being known as a wife beater than being able to coach a GAA club so why is one the other one taking precedent for Gallagher. What you are saying makes no sense.

This is also a prime example of how opinionated you are on matters you don't know the full ins and outs of.

Strange you still can't offer us an opinion of whether you think Nicola Gallahger's allegations are credible. You'll offer an opinion on pretty much everything else.

I think it's clear now you don't believe but don't tell us why.

Claiming I don't know the ins and outs while claiming you don't?!

There's daft then there is hand of god!

You are the one offering opinions on why Gallagher isn't taking legal action when you have no idea of why he has or hasn't.

A prime example that you are  totally disingenuous in the reasoning you have given to avoid answering whether you believe Nicola Gallagher's allegations are credible.

You have no issue offering opinions. You just know it's difficult to justify why you have dismissed Nicola Gallaghers allegations as credible. You know how that looks and how it shows 2 fingers to domestic violence victims so you avoid addressing the question.

I'll ask again and you will avoid again.

Do you think Nicola Gallahger's allegations are credible? Yes or no. The more you avoid this the worse you come across

[Hand of God]

Lads, stop entertaining this fella. It's as simple as that.

Which part of what I said do you disagree with?

I think you are yet another person on here with an appalling outlook on domestic violence and are quite aggressive when that is examined.

[Hand of God]

RG was not charged and won custody, probably his aim and doesn't want or need to engage further proceedings with the ex wife

Jarly enters stage left to punch down on behalf of a sports national governing body, RG has the right to proceed as he sees fit

And Nicola Gallagher? Domestic violence victims?

You don't seem to consider them at all. Rory Gallagher is the victim in your eyes, Jarlath Burns is the abuser. Crazy.

[p3427977]

55 pages of the same.

[Milltown Row2]

This is one of many posts earlier were I've not discounted mrs Gallagher. Hog has refused to read my posts

As for this one question on credibility of mrs Gallagher's post on fb, it could be true it could be false and maybe the answer could be somewhere in between, I believe she wrote what she felt was true

I've put them in bold just in case your eyes are struggling

[tiempo]

RG was not charged and won custody, probably his aim and doesn't want or need to engage further proceedings with the ex wife

Jarly enters stage left to punch down on behalf of a sports national governing body, RG has the right to proceed as he sees fit

And Nicola Gallagher? Domestic violence victims?

You don't seem to consider them at all. Rory Gallagher is the victim in your eyes, Jarlath Burns is the abuser. Crazy.

If you find out a thing or 2 about family court proceedings

c100 and Safeguarding
Section 7
Dispute resolution
PD12J
Final heading and order
(The minimum steps)

Then you'll find Mrs Gallaghers claims have been priced into the decision to award custody of the kids to RG

The Gallaghers have been through a formal legal process administered by the DoJ

Then another wing it form of frontier justice dispensed by Jarlath

Yes the latter was abusive, abuser being Jarlath, victims being RG and more importantly the kids

Jarlath of course doesn't have to explain any of this to the kids, or provide for them or tuck them in at night. What he did was poorly thought out and reckless, and has completely undermined the Game Changer initiative, showing it up at best as another virtue signalling slogan and worst the GAAs in house mechanism to slander and wade through people's private lives

[93-DY-SAM]

RG was not charged and won custody, probably his aim and doesn't want or need to engage further proceedings with the ex wife

Jarly enters stage left to punch down on behalf of a sports national governing body, RG has the right to proceed as he sees fit

And Nicola Gallagher? Domestic violence victims?

You don't seem to consider them at all. Rory Gallagher is the victim in your eyes, Jarlath Burns is the abuser. Crazy.

Examples please?

Lads, stop entertaining this fella. It's as simple as that.

Which part of what I said do you disagree with?

I think you are yet another person on here with an appalling outlook on domestic violence and are quite aggressive when that is examined.

Examples please?

I've had my say on this a long time back at the time. All you have done is repeat the same things over and over with no engagement with other posters when asked any detail. David laid out all the facts from a legal perspective but sure he is only a solicitor so what would he know. Did you get your law degree from the same cornflakes box as wee Seamie Bryson.

Hope you find the answers to whatever is making you so angry. You just won't find them here as none of us here knows the exact ins and outs of this.

All the best. 

[Wildweasel74]

Didnt see you do much complaining when a certain lad was still playing for Cullyhanna under circumstances still to be determined!

[Baile Brigín 2]

Didnt see you do much complaining when a certain lad was still playing for Cullyhanna under circumstances still to be determined!

Again. Playing and managing/coaching are different things. Different rules apply.

[Wildweasel74]

Why, that one not bringing the GAA into dispute?

[David McKeown]

RG was not charged and won custody, probably his aim and doesn't want or need to engage further proceedings with the ex wife

Jarly enters stage left to punch down on behalf of a sports national governing body, RG has the right to proceed as he sees fit

And Nicola Gallagher? Domestic violence victims?

You don't seem to consider them at all. Rory Gallagher is the victim in your eyes, Jarlath Burns is the abuser. Crazy.

Examples please?

Lads, stop entertaining this fella. It's as simple as that.

Which part of what I said do you disagree with?

I think you are yet another person on here with an appalling outlook on domestic violence and are quite aggressive when that is examined.

Examples please?

I've had my say on this a long time back at the time. All you have done is repeat the same things over and over with no engagement with other posters when asked any detail. David laid out all the facts from a legal perspective but sure he is only a solicitor so what would he know. Did you get your law degree from the same cornflakes box as wee Seamie Bryson.

Hope you find the answers to whatever is making you so angry. You just won't find them here as none of us here knows the exact ins and outs of this.

All the best. 

No I'm not. Besmirching the good name of solicitors there.

[nrico2006]

Didnt see you do much complaining when a certain lad was still playing for Cullyhanna under circumstances still to be determined!

Again. Playing and managing/coaching are different things. Different rules apply.

You would imagine the same rules should apply in Nugents case though. Gallagher wasn't being hounded because he was a manager, would have been no different if he had been a player.

[Milltown Row2]

Didnt see you do much complaining when a certain lad was still playing for Cullyhanna under circumstances still to be determined!

Again. Playing and managing/coaching are different things. Different rules apply.

You would imagine the same rules should apply in Nugents case though. Gallagher wasn't being hounded because he was a manager, would have been no different if he had been a player.

Teams can have 17 year olds in their squad. Would that be a concern?

Otherwise it's primarily managers/coaches

[imtommygunn]

None of what Burns did was anything to do with safeguarding or anything to do with RG being a manager....