Olympic boxing

[Milltown Row2]

http://www.balls.ie/boxing/michael-conlan-international-reaction/343089

So now we have the New York Times, Ring Magazine and Al Bernstein commenting on it.  Would this now constitute an "international reaction" MR2?  Or is it still just the silly aul Irish lads having a moan?

Tomorrows fish and chip paper, will Conlon get another go??

[Franko]

http://www.balls.ie/boxing/michael-conlan-international-reaction/343089

So now we have the New York Times, Ring Magazine and Al Bernstein commenting on it.  Would this now constitute an "international reaction" MR2?  Or is it still just the silly aul Irish lads having a moan?

Tomorrows fish and chip paper, will Conlon get another go??

You said that yesterday...  as for the second part... straw man much?

[Milltown Row2]

http://www.balls.ie/boxing/michael-conlan-international-reaction/343089

So now we have the New York Times, Ring Magazine and Al Bernstein commenting on it.  Would this now constitute an "international reaction" MR2?  Or is it still just the silly aul Irish lads having a moan?

Tomorrows fish and chip paper, will Conlon get another go??

You said that yesterday...  as for the second part... straw man much?

Reinstated yet??

[AZOffaly]

What has reinstated got to do with it? If they are corrupt, they can hardly reinstate him and admit as much.

[Franko]

http://www.balls.ie/boxing/michael-conlan-international-reaction/343089

So now we have the New York Times, Ring Magazine and Al Bernstein commenting on it.  Would this now constitute an "international reaction" MR2?  Or is it still just the silly aul Irish lads having a moan?

Tomorrows fish and chip paper, will Conlon get another go??

You said that yesterday...  as for the second part... straw man much?

Reinstated yet??

Straw man.  Who suggested that?

Someone asked if there'd been an international reaction at all.  You flat out answered no.  And unless you want to argue that the UK, America and Argentina aren't international,  then that was just plain wrong.

[The Gs Man]

Who's he talking about there do you think?  Conlan or the dude that got arrested?

[Franko]

Who's he talking about there do you think?  Conlan or the dude that got arrested?

I would be pretty sure (hope!) the latter.  If it's the former he is indeed a complete ball beg (as suspected  )

[Minder]

"Justice for Michael Conlan" page on Facebook now, just waiting for the Just Fund Me page

[imtommygunn]

MR for someone who complains about people being internet trolls you're being a bit of an internet troll.

[AZOffaly]

"Justice for Michael Conlan" page on Facebook now, just waiting for the Just Fund Me page

Had to chuckle at that alright. The initial reaction is natural and normal, but some lads love a crusade. Reminds me of the Thierry Henry handball thing now.

The judges should not be allowed judge again, and if they are corrupt then they should be banned and/or arrested. Other than that, everyone has to move on.

[mrdeeds]

The judges are after being sent home but result stands.

[muppet]

The judges are after being sent home but result stands.

Cop out.

The question is not whether or not they are incompetent, it is whether or not they are corrupt.

'sent home' = no investigation.

[AZOffaly]

The judges are after being sent home but result stands.

Cop out.

The question is not whether or not they are incompetent, it is whether or not they are corrupt.

'sent home' = no investigation.

Exactly. It does speak volumes though. Who decided to send them home, and on what grounds?

[mrdeeds]

The judges are after being sent home but result stands.

Cop out.

The question is not whether or not they are incompetent, it is whether or not they are corrupt.

'sent home' = no investigation.

Exactly. It does speak volumes though. Who decided to send them home, and on what grounds?

IABA sent home them judges and the ones from the conteoversial decison in heavyweight fight.

[muppet]

The judges are after being sent home but result stands.

Cop out.

The question is not whether or not they are incompetent, it is whether or not they are corrupt.

'sent home' = no investigation.

Exactly. It does speak volumes though. Who decided to send them home, and on what grounds?

Now you are talking.

It reminds me of 'he was moved to another parish'.