Man Utd Thread:

Started by full back, November 10, 2006, 08:13:49 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

EC Unique


screenexile

He has a fair point. I'm not saying that Ferguson isn't a great manager but there is no doubt money has been the defining factor in United's success. If he was in charge of Blackburn Rovers or QPR over the same period we would be saying he's just a pretty good manager.

I would imagine the money is about 75% and 25% down to Ferguson.

sammymaguire

Quote from: screenexile on October 17, 2011, 04:45:23 PM
He has a fair point. I'm not saying that Ferguson isn't a great manager but there is no doubt money has been the defining factor in United's success. If he was in charge of Blackburn Rovers or QPR over the same period we would be saying he's just a pretty good manager.

I would imagine the money is about 75% and 25% down to Ferguson.

...............................,-~*`?lllllll`*~,............................................. .....
...........................,-~*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll?`*-,..........................................
......................,-~*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll*-,......................................
..................,-*llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll.\... ..................................
................;*`lllllllllllllllllllllllllll,-~*~-,llllllllllllllllllll\....................................
................\lllllllllllllllllllllllllll/...........\;;;;llllllllllll,-`~-,................................
.................\lllllllllllllllllllll,-*.............`~-~-,...(.(?`*,`,...............................
...................\llllllllllll,-~*........................)_-\..*`*;..)..............................
.....................\,-*`?,*`)............,-~*`~................../...............................
.....................|/.../.../~,......-~*,-~*`;.................../.\..............................
.................../.../..../..../..,-,..*~,.`*~*..................*...\.......................... ...
...................|.../.../..../.*`...\................................)....)?`~,........... .........
...................|./..../..../........).........)`*~-,............../.....|..)...`~-,..............
.................././.../....,*`-,.....`-,....*`....,---......\...../...../..|..........?```*~-,,,,
.................(............)`*~-,.....`*`.,-~*.,-*.......|.../..../..../...............\..........
..................*-,.......`*-,...`~,..``.,,,-*.............|.,*...,*....|.................\.........
......................*,.........`-,....)-,..................,-*`...,-*.....(`-,..............\........
........................f`-,........`-,/...*-,___,,-~*.....,-*......|....`-,...............\.......
DRIVE THAT BALL ON!!

ross4life

Quote from: screenexile on October 17, 2011, 04:45:23 PM
He has a fair point. I'm not saying that Ferguson isn't a great manager but there is no doubt money has been the defining factor in United's success. If he was in charge of Blackburn Rovers or QPR over the same period we would be saying he's just a pretty good manager.

I would imagine the money is about 75% and 25% down to Ferguson.
He was manager of Aberdeen & have you seen any team get near to Celitic,Rangers in Scotland since he left? 25% my ass.. clearly some won't realise how good Fergie is until he's gone & even then bitterness won't allowed them to admit it.

P.S the above article has been posted to death on almost every football forum & most agree Rafa is smoking the funny stuff again.

The key to success is to be consistently competitive -- if you bang on the door often it will open

Clown

its a lot more than 25% down to Fergies skills as a manager i think

having said that though, its not broadcasted as much as other clubs how much United have spent down through the years

AZOffaly

Ferguson has proved over and over again that he is a top class manager. He's had 4 or 5 different teams at this stage I'd say. The Bruce Team, the Cantona Team, the Keane Team, the Scholes Team and the Rooney Team. And it's not all money, he's had a fair few duds in his time, but he is phenomonal at getting United to work hard, and keep their appetite.

I think he also learned a lesson in Europe as well. He used to be afraid to play in Europe, thinking there was some magic formula. Since he realised his team was better than most, he's been a lot more confident in Europe and seen a lot more success.

Boycey

Quote from: Clown on October 17, 2011, 05:15:45 PM
its a lot more than 25% down to Fergies skills as a manager i think

having said that though, its not broadcasted as much as other clubs how much United have spent down through the years

This info is easily obtained

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html

Probably a bit lopsided due to Chelsea/Citys recent spending but shows Uniteds success down to way more than money..

screenexile

Quote from: ross4life on October 17, 2011, 05:11:43 PM
Quote from: screenexile on October 17, 2011, 04:45:23 PM
He has a fair point. I'm not saying that Ferguson isn't a great manager but there is no doubt money has been the defining factor in United's success. If he was in charge of Blackburn Rovers or QPR over the same period we would be saying he's just a pretty good manager.

I would imagine the money is about 75% and 25% down to Ferguson.
He was manager of Aberdeen & have you seen any team get near to Celitic,Rangers in Scotland since he left? 25% my ass.. clearly some won't realise how good Fergie is until he's gone & even then bitterness won't allowed them to admit it.

P.S the above article has been posted to death on almost every football forum & most agree Rafa is smoking the funny stuff again.

It's not like he took them from the bottom of the league to win it! When he took them over they had just finished 2nd in the league . . . like I said he is a great manager no doubt but the money factor relating to his success is huge and cannot be underestimated.

Unlike Mourinho who has won the big prize on a fairly modest budget!

Boycey

Quote from: screenexile on October 17, 2011, 05:29:32 PM
Quote from: ross4life on October 17, 2011, 05:11:43 PM
Quote from: screenexile on October 17, 2011, 04:45:23 PM
He has a fair point. I'm not saying that Ferguson isn't a great manager but there is no doubt money has been the defining factor in United's success. If he was in charge of Blackburn Rovers or QPR over the same period we would be saying he's just a pretty good manager.

I would imagine the money is about 75% and 25% down to Ferguson.
He was manager of Aberdeen & have you seen any team get near to Celitic,Rangers in Scotland since he left? 25% my ass.. clearly some won't realise how good Fergie is until he's gone & even then bitterness won't allowed them to admit it.

P.S the above article has been posted to death on almost every football forum & most agree Rafa is smoking the funny stuff again.

It's not like he took them from the bottom of the league to win it! When he took them over they had just finished 2nd in the league . . . like I said he is a great manager no doubt but the money factor relating to his success is huge and cannot be underestimated.
Unlike Mourinho who has won the big prize on a fairly modest budget!

or over-estimated ;) see above

Dinny Breen

Quote from: Boycey on October 17, 2011, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: Clown on October 17, 2011, 05:15:45 PM
its a lot more than 25% down to Fergies skills as a manager i think

having said that though, its not broadcasted as much as other clubs how much United have spent down through the years

This info is easily obtained

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html

Probably a bit lopsided due to Chelsea/Citys recent spending but shows Uniteds success down to way more than money..

What was the table before Abramovich? Would be very surprised if Man U weren't top. Arsenal's figures are the most remarkable.

They say a great manager is that not only would he manage his team to beat yours but that he would also manage your team to beat his, Ferguson is firmly in that category.
#newbridgeornowhere

Boycey

Quote from: Dinny Breen on October 17, 2011, 05:49:35 PM
Quote from: Boycey on October 17, 2011, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: Clown on October 17, 2011, 05:15:45 PM
its a lot more than 25% down to Fergies skills as a manager i think

having said that though, its not broadcasted as much as other clubs how much United have spent down through the years

This info is easily obtained

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html

Probably a bit lopsided due to Chelsea/Citys recent spending but shows Uniteds success down to way more than money..

What was the table before Abramovich? Would be very surprised if Man U weren't top. Arsenal's figures are the most remarkable.

They say a great manager is that not only would he manage his team to beat yours but that he would also manage your team to beat his, Ferguson is firmly in that category.

Thats not on there but I worked it from 2 tables thats are there 1992-2011 and 2003-2011, subtract one from another and you get 1992-2003. Sad or what :-[

United Nett Spend £91m
Pool  £90m
City  £70m
Arsenal £65m
Chelsea £65m
Spurs £60m

Heres one thatll interest Dinny, Arsenal used to spend a pound at one stage

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/premiership-football-club-comparisons/premier-league-comparisons.html

Tony Baloney

See Fergie has lined up his mates Clattenburg and Howard The Red for the derby.

mountainboii

Quote from: Boycey on October 17, 2011, 05:28:04 PM
Quote from: Clown on October 17, 2011, 05:15:45 PM
its a lot more than 25% down to Fergies skills as a manager i think

having said that though, its not broadcasted as much as other clubs how much United have spent down through the years

This info is easily obtained

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/league-tables/1992-to-2011.html

Probably a bit lopsided due to Chelsea/Citys recent spending but shows Uniteds success down to way more than money..

Without info on wages, you're really only getting half the picture here.

nrico2006

At the end of the day alot of teams are spending huge amounts these days, and alot of the money being spent has no correlation between these teams recent achievement on the pitch.  United didn't buy the Premier League in 1993, but since then they have used their success on the field to generate more money (through sponsorship, prizemoney, merchandising etc) which they have rightfully spent on new players among other things, a sort of natural progression.  When you see the figures that have been spent over the years and you see the amounts the Liverpools, Chelseas and Citys have spent then it is clear that these clubs are simply trying to buy success.  The fat Spanish waiter spent some serious money in his time at Anfield with little to show for it.
'To the extreme I rock a mic like a vandal, light up a stage and wax a chump like a candle.'