Ryan Giggs

[AQMP]

It's amazing the amount of United fans who 'couldn't care less what Giggsy does'! If it was Terry or Gerard however and they'd be the moral guardians of us all!

And its amazing the amount of the ABU brigade are falling over themselves like schoolgirls to get in on the gossip. Gerard Giggs Terry - who gives a shite what they get up to.

Some night out there!!

[ballinaman]

It's amazing the amount of United fans who 'couldn't care less what Giggsy does'! If it was Terry or Gerard however and they'd be the moral guardians of us all!

And its amazing the amount of the ABU brigade are falling over themselves like schoolgirls to get in on the gossip. Gerard Giggs Terry - who gives a shite what they get up to.

They haven't much to crow about in terms of football so leave them at it....

[Groucho]

Just reading the judges report there - she seems like a right piece of work

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1232.html

Giggs was stupid getting involved with her in the first place.

She has proved to be a very dear roide!!

[Milltown Row2]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

[tommysmith]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

I still would 

[el_cuervo_fc]

Hateful bitch. How long could she do for blackmail?

[Milltown Row2]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

Yeah all day long but come on, she's running around (in a red dress ) saying she's getting it tough FFS.

God knows how many footballers she's tried to sting. Men are thick no doubt about that, standing dcik and all that

I still would 

Yeah all day long but come on, she's running around (in a red dress ) saying she's getting it tough FFS.

God knows how many footballers she's tried to sting. Men are thick no doubt about that, standing dcik and all that

[AQMP]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

Yeah, married man with two kids meets single woman in hotel for extra marital sex...he's a complete tr**p

[imtommygunn]

What is the sequence of events here though?

Did the sun find out about this and then the injunction happened or did she go to the papers first?

At the end of the day there are 2 bad guys here - a lot of people seem quick to paint her as the bad guy. Takes 2 to tango and all that...

[Milltown Row2]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

Yeah, married man with two kids meets single woman in hotel for extra marital sex...he's a complete tr**p

Yes and i know he is a trap also, but he is staying at a hotel with the team on away games, she then phones The Sun  to turn up and get photo of her coming out of a room!!! tr**p or not?

[AQMP]

The "blackmail" allegation in some parts is that Ms Thomas requested anything from £50k to £100k not to kiss and tell.  Mr Giggs' legal costs (so far) are estimated at £200k.  I'd say maths wasn't Ryan's strong subject at school??

[Milltown Row2]

The "blackmail" allegation in some parts is that Ms Thomas requested anything from £50k to £100k not to kiss and tell.  Mr Giggs' legal costs (so far) are estimated at £200k.  I'd say maths wasn't Ryan's strong subject at school??

Ethics/morals weren't either by the sound of it, but maybe he preferred to let someone else have the money, she still cant talk about it so is not making any money and coming across as a tr**p, who'd would like to blackmail people who are famous.

Whats the word for someone who gets money for sex.............

[AQMP]

It now seems that the Claimant may well have been "set up" so that photographs could be taken of Ms Thomas going to one or other, or both, of the hotels. Although the position is not yet by any means clear, the evidence before me on 14 April appeared to suggest that Ms Thomas had arranged the hotel rendezvous in collaboration with photographers and/or journalists. He first began to "smell a rat" when she told him at the first April meeting, perhaps feigning innocence, that she had been followed and recognised when she visited the first hotel.

tr**p or not?

Yeah, married man with two kids meets single woman in hotel for extra marital sex...he's a complete tr**p

Yes and i know he is a trap also, but he is staying at a hotel with the team on away games, she then phones The Sun  to turn up and get photo of her coming out of a room!!! tr**p or not?

Dunno if I'd go as far as to refer to her as a tr**p but agreed, not the sort of girl I'd like my son to marry. 

My references to Mr Giggs as a tr**p etc are purely tongue in cheek.  I really couldn't care less what he gets up to in his private life.  He has to deal with the fall out from betraying the trust of his wife.  I've often said that I wouldn't look to a professional footballer for moral guidance.  He also either received or accepted (or both) bad legal advice and I'm sure he'll pay a heavy financial price for that.  The attempt to sue Twitter was primary school stuff and only made a bad situation worse

[AQMP]

The "blackmail" allegation in some parts is that Ms Thomas requested anything from £50k to £100k not to kiss and tell.  Mr Giggs' legal costs (so far) are estimated at £200k.  I'd say maths wasn't Ryan's strong subject at school??

Ethics/morals weren't either by the sound of it, but maybe he preferred to let someone else have the money, she still cant talk about it so is not making any money and coming across as a tr**p, who'd would like to blackmail people who are famous.

Whats the word for someone who gets money for sex.............

Entrepreneur??

[seafoid]

Just reading the judges report there - she seems like a right piece of work

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2011/1232.html

Giggs was stupid getting involved with her in the first place.

From the link:

The Claimant is a married man with a family. It is well established, in such circumstances, that the court needs to take into account and have regard to the interests of the claimant's family members, and their rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Privacy defined by judges should always be a last resort, says the FT. Giggs should have kept his trousers on and none of this would have happened.