Tyrone Club Football and Hurling

[ClubScene13]

Fair play to Kildress they're in a bad year and still totally rent free in a lot of people's heads for whatever reason. A club I always liked as they'll get completely leathered in while shaking your hand after. Do not agree with the majority of the carry on here the last while

Good win for edendork today over their neighbours who had been on a good run. What happened in clonoe that the result seems to be up in the air?

[outsiderlookingin]

Was at the bay on saturday, 2 good games, but the difference in soccer management and GAA is unreal,the shouting in the 2nd game i dont know how the lads played,good we crowd there also

[superstar_]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

[WT4E]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

[superstar_]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

[Sean Coyle]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

[superstar_]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

That is the new rule. If he gave the black, he should also be giving the penalty. If he isn't taken down he has a clear goal chance.

[DouglasBridgeExile]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

That is the new rule. If he gave the black, he should also be giving the penalty. If he isn't taken down he has a clear goal chance.

Was talking one of the naomh Eoghan players this morning, referee played two extra minutes and kildress had a 2 point free at the end of the game. If your players aren't able to score dead balls it's hardly the refs fault.

[Winthebreak]

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

Speaking to a few spectators who were at the game, they would be of the opinion Mayse filled the togs immediately after getting a yellow for his part in the Red card issued, feigned a hammy to get off in case any lad from Kildress might run into him. Suppose it will be interesting to see if he's fit to play in the next fixture!!!

[Sean Coyle]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

That is the new rule. If he gave the black, he should also be giving the penalty. If he isn't taken down he has a clear goal chance.

Was talking one of the naomh Eoghan players this morning, referee played two extra minutes and kildress had a 2 point free at the end of the game. If your players aren't able to score dead balls it's hardly the refs fault.

You said you were at the game last night Douglas, why did you need to speak to Newton players if so!

Typical keyboard warrior acting the big lad behind your screen while spouting nothing but pure brown!

[WT4E]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

What club are you?

This is crazy stuff. I didn't say we didn't deserve a red I just think if two boys are fighting. It's 2 reds.

He was 25 metres from goals with other Kildress defenders between him and the goal. How can u say that his next thing is it to shoot on goal? By the logic every black card anywhere on the pitch is a penalty???

Again I have no issue with NE they scraped a result against us fair play and good luck but you avoided the question.

I wouldn't expect a Kildress ref to appointed to Rock v Greencastle tonight.

Kildress kicked themselves out of it but done well to have opportunities even with 14/13 men the whole game. Sean devenney was a significant contributing factor to the result.

[DouglasBridgeExile]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

That is the new rule. If he gave the black, he should also be giving the penalty. If he isn't taken down he has a clear goal chance.

Was talking one of the naomh Eoghan players this morning, referee played two extra minutes and kildress had a 2 point free at the end of the game. If your players aren't able to score dead balls it's hardly the refs fault.

You said you were at the game last night Douglas, why did you need to speak to Newton players if so!

Typical keyboard warrior acting the big lad behind your screen while spouting nothing but pure brown!

I was at the game, I couldn't hear from the stand how long the referee added on , one of the players said he added two minutes but played 4.. there's your answer ye wet wipe

[superstar_]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

What club are you?

This is crazy stuff. I didn't say we didn't deserve a red I just think if two boys are fighting. It's 2 reds.

He was 25 metres from goals with other Kildress defenders between him and the goal. How can u say that his next thing is it to shoot on goal? By the logic every black card anywhere on the pitch is a penalty???

Again I have no issue with NE they scraped a result against us fair play and good luck but you avoided the question.

I wouldn't expect a Kildress ref to appointed to Rock v Greencastle tonight.

Kildress kicked themselves out of it but done well to have opportunities even with 14/13 men the whole game. Sean devenney was a significant contributing factor to the result.

NE 24 was on the 20 heading for the 13. If the defender doesn't pull him down he is in on goal. The new rule in that case is a penalty. I don't like it but by the rules it is a penalty.
One player threw punches, the other didn't. Correct call by Devenney.
2 penalties not given, one for Kildress one against, is the only grievance you can have with Devenney.

[Sean Coyle]

I was in Kildress as a neutral. Naomh Eoghan the better team and missed a crazy amount of chances. Only thing Kildress can feel hard done by over was the second half penalty which was definetly touched on the ground by NE number 4. Naomh Eoghan should also have had a penalty in the first half for the black card, the new rule on cynical foul preventing a goal scoring chance leading to a penalty should have been used here. The red card was deserved, Kildress clearly went out to target Ryan Mayse and the full back correctly walked for his punches.

Would like to let this fixture lie but I can't let this crap be the last post on it. NE did miss chance but Kildress missed as many if not more - Our dead balls where unusally bad (we where missing Shea Tracey) and we had a number of goal chances.

I'll take your point on the red if thats how you see it but Mayse started the scrap - hes no saint. Maybe he got a shoulder or push as any defender might do against a op forward at the beginning of a contest.

As for giving a penalty for the dubious black card which occured about 25m from goal and other defenders in the area - that is raking the absolute piss!

As a 'neutral' what is your opinion on a ref from Drumquin being appointed this game considering its in his interest to prevent Kildress from winning the game to keep them well below Drumquin?

The Kildress full back threw punches, how is that red card even up for discussion?
The NE penalty. NE 24's next action was a shot directly on the keeper, the player who pulled him down was the last defender back, under the new rule it is a black card and penalty.
It is the county boards fault for putting a Drumquin referee in that position but he denied both teams a penalty, got the red card correct and the rest was his usual picky stuff that was even to both teams.

The black card happened outside the 20. The 24 didn't even get fully turned never mind have a chance to shoot. Some laugh this is. Genuinely might not be anything worse in our game than old farts that don't have a clue.

That is the new rule. If he gave the black, he should also be giving the penalty. If he isn't taken down he has a clear goal chance.

Was talking one of the naomh Eoghan players this morning, referee played two extra minutes and kildress had a 2 point free at the end of the game. If your players aren't able to score dead balls it's hardly the refs fault.

You said you were at the game last night Douglas, why did you need to speak to Newton players if so!

Typical keyboard warrior acting the big lad behind your screen while spouting nothing but pure brown!

I was at the game, I couldn't hear from the stand how long the referee added on , one of the players said he added two minutes but played 4.. there's your answer ye wet wipe

Why'd you not see the non existent 2 point free at the end then?

The one you would've referring to is where Mulgrew took a solo and go and devenny pulled it back for no apparent reason. Which was on the halfway line and played short.

As I said old farts with no clue, but going by your immaturity I'd say your just a 21 year old kid with no mates.

[2ndstringsub]

Any other craic at the weekend guys?