Tyrone v Kerry NFL Round 2

Started by Kerry Mike, February 01, 2009, 04:11:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 ... 61
User actions

under the bar

#795
February 23, 2009, 08:46:09 PM
QuoteDisgraceful decision. This perverted action deserves more than a paltry 6 weeks.

You are right.  Look at what the poor Kerry women have to endure a life-time of!

Zapatista

#796
February 23, 2009, 09:16:51 PM
Seen Ricey cup Galvin again and Galvin drop like a sack of spuds. 6 Weeks is outragous. It was a harmless cupping and nothing more than a little bit of messing. Wathced it on the news with non-gaa friends who thought it was harmless and had a good laugh they were calling Ricey a cheeky monkey. The behaviour of the Cork players is doing untold damage to the GAA while Ricey brings a little harmless fun and a welcome distraction. Sort youselves out anyone looking for a ban.

Ricey for President.

ziggysego

#797
February 23, 2009, 09:29:31 PM
I watched it with a soccer fan on Saturday. He laughed and said I was craic telling him soccer is a pantomime sport.
Testing Accessibility

pintsofguinness

#798
February 23, 2009, 09:35:13 PM
I watched it wiht a soccer fan and he said he should get 6 months ban.
Which one of you bitches wants to dance?

never kickt a ball

#799
February 23, 2009, 09:39:00 PM
Quote from: ziggysego on February 23, 2009, 09:29:31 PM
I watched it with a soccer fan on Saturday. He laughed and said I was craic telling him soccer is a pantomime sport.
Quote from: pintsofguinness on February 23, 2009, 09:35:13 PM
I watched it wiht a soccer fan and he said he should get 6 months ban.

Oh no you didn't!

Maguire01

#800
February 23, 2009, 10:05:19 PM
Quote from: Mickeys beard on February 23, 2009, 08:14:27 PM
Disgraceful decision.  A warning would have sufficed. 
Eh? What purpose would a warning serve? A ban is totally appropriate.

Sandy Hill

#801
February 23, 2009, 10:10:58 PM
Quote from: Zapatista on February 23, 2009, 09:16:51 PM
Seen Ricey cup Galvin again and Galvin drop like a sack of spuds. 6 Weeks is outragous. It was a harmless cupping and nothing more than a little bit of messing. Wathced it on the news with non-gaa friends who thought it was harmless and had a good laugh they were calling Ricey a cheeky monkey. The behaviour of the Cork players is doing untold damage to the GAA while Ricey brings a little harmless fun and a welcome distraction. Sort youselves out anyone looking for a ban.

Ricey for President.

If someone grabbed you by the bollocks , would you consider it to be a harmless cupping and and little bit of messing; I certainly wouldn't?  McMenamin is a thug, not a "cheeky monkey", and he behaved as such throughout much of last week's match and indeed not for the first time! Although a talented player his behaviour during matches is so often downright wrong and shows scant respect for our game and its players and followers.



"Stercus accidit"

pintsofguinness

#802
February 23, 2009, 10:12:10 PM
Quote
If someone grabbed you by the bollocks , would you consider it to be a harmless cupping and and little bit of messing;

Maybe he would...
Which one of you bitches wants to dance?

Zapatista

#803
February 23, 2009, 10:18:54 PM
Quote from: Sandy Hill on February 23, 2009, 10:10:58 PM
Quote from: Zapatista on February 23, 2009, 09:16:51 PM
Seen Ricey cup Galvin again and Galvin drop like a sack of spuds. 6 Weeks is outragous. It was a harmless cupping and nothing more than a little bit of messing. Wathced it on the news with non-gaa friends who thought it was harmless and had a good laugh they were calling Ricey a cheeky monkey. The behaviour of the Cork players is doing untold damage to the GAA while Ricey brings a little harmless fun and a welcome distraction. Sort youselves out anyone looking for a ban.

Ricey for President.

If someone grabbed you by the bollocks , would you consider it to be a harmless cupping and and little bit of messing; I certainly wouldn't?  McMenamin is a thug, not a "cheeky monkey", and he behaved as such throughout much of last week's match and indeed not for the first time! Although a talented player his behaviour during matches is so often downright wrong and shows scant respect for our game and its players and followers.






Depends on the circumstances. Stop with the drama FFS.

Tyrone Dreamer

#804
February 23, 2009, 10:29:56 PM
Below is a quote from an other message board. Is there any truth in what is said?:

Depends on how they look at it. When Galvin punched Stephen Lavin, I think it was, in the balls in the 2004 Munster Final, not a blind bit of notice was paid to it, though it was caught clearly on camera. When Dara O Sé grabbed, and viciously twisted, the balls of Austin O'Malley ( with O'Malley contorted in genuine pain, and not the acting that Galvin was at yesterday either) of Mayo in the All Ireland QF the same year, nothing was said.,

dodo

#805
February 23, 2009, 11:48:50 PM
Surprised by Tyrone appealing this decision, it's only bringing ridicule on them. His display in Healy park that day was littered with acts of petulance and by appealing the severity of the sentence the only benefit Tyrone can gather from this farce is building a siege mentality and a cause for the year....let's do it for Ricey, nobody loves us.

Jinxy

#806
February 23, 2009, 11:56:36 PM
Quote from: ziggysego on February 23, 2009, 09:29:31 PM
I watched it with a soccer fan on Saturday. He laughed and said I was craic telling him soccer is a pantomime sport.

I watched it with a darts fan and he said he should have got 6 years for it.
If you were any use you'd be playing.

tyrone86

#807
February 23, 2009, 11:57:19 PM
Whilst I have no wish to see Ricey suspended, I would like someone from the Tyrone County Board and / or Mickey Harte (whoever decided to appeal the suspension) to tell me where exactly the line is in terms of the accepting suspensions? Is anything that the referee doesn't see / act upon at the time and a post game suspension is imposed fair game for appeal? Is it a case of anything that has a successful chance of appeal will be fought? There comes a point when people have to look at what they're condoning and wise the f**k up.

ardmhachaabu

#808
February 23, 2009, 11:58:52 PM
Quote from: tyrone86 on February 23, 2009, 11:57:19 PM
Whilst I have no wish to see Ricey suspended, I would like someone from the Tyrone County Board and / or Mickey Harte (whoever decided to appeal the suspension) to tell me where exactly the line is in terms of the accepting suspensions? Is anything that the referee doesn't see / act upon at the time and a post game suspension is imposed fair game for appeal? Is it a case of anything that has a successful chance of appeal will be fought? There comes a point when people have to look at what they're condoning and wise the f**k up.
One Tyronie talking sense anyway  :)
Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something

imtommygunn

#809
February 24, 2009, 12:04:07 AM
While Ricey deserves a ban this thread has got a bit ridiculous. It wasn't as bad as Tom Kenny's with the hurl the other year or wasn't it Enda Muldoon against Donegal the other year? He is far from the first to do this in a match. The claims of sexual assault are ridiculous.

That said he was behaving like a tr**p all day that day. His provocation of Marc O'Se at the end was nothing short of thuggish behaviour which there's no place for on a footall field. In that regard I'm glad he's banned. Like is said here - great footballer but a madman at times.

Appealing the decisions is a joke too.Shouldn't be done.
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 ... 61
User actions