NFL Division 1 2024

[highorlow]

Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

If you think that's not a red card then you've had too many knocks on the head yourself. It was late, high and dangerous, he had time to pull out of it as well.

[Mikhailov]

Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

If you think that's not a red card then you've had too many knocks on the head yourself. It was late, high and dangerous, he had time to pull out of it as well.

High or low - forget about it.

Had time to pull out if it - are you crazy? It was a big man colliding with a smaller man, albeit slightly late but there was no malice involved

But malice involved in every tackle on Darragh Canavan, all without punishment from a poor referee

As someone said earlier, they are all poor - you just hope you get one of the better poor ones!

[highorlow]

It was an awful effort at a tackle. I'll have to watch the replay but from what I saw earlier he didn't need to bull doze in the way he did.

[ONeill]

Enjoyed that today. Promising performances from a spread of new lads. Morgan, McKernan and Canavan had big games.

Roscommon manager spent the whole game yapping at the linesman with arms spread out. Every call. Yapping.

[tyrone08]

Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

If you think that's not a red card then you've had too many knocks on the head yourself. It was late, high and dangerous, he had time to pull out of it as well.

When you say it was "late". He collided with a player who had the ball in his hands. He still had the ball in his hands when he hit the ground.

Exactly. It can't be a late tackle when the man has the ball in his hands. Some stupid comments about

[Milltown Row2]

Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

If you think that's not a red card then you've had too many knocks on the head yourself. It was late, high and dangerous, he had time to pull out of it as well.

When you say it was "late". He collided with a player who had the ball in his hands. He still had the ball in his hands when he hit the ground.

Exactly. It can't be a late tackle when the man has the ball in his hands. Some stupid comments about

Did he tackle the ball?

Was it reckless?

Was it head height?

Red card for the look of astonishment after the ref blew the whistle

[Wildweasel74]

Didn't think it was a red myself but made zero effort to tackle the ball, just block the man. Square ball, the player came across the square to collect the ball before the pass. Debatable if it should been disallowed. Ball was palmed in, not thrown, some lads must be blind.

[RedHand88]

He threw it into the net never mind the square ball. It wasn't a palm or a fist. Both hands were on the ball and he threw it in

That's the way all passes across the square are finished to the net nowadays.

Normally its a palm into the net at head height or so, as the ball was nearly below the knee it looked like he threw it in rather than palmed it in. Square ball call was tight but as Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

Two passes before the finish was a very obvious square ball though. Man receives it deep in the square with his back to goal before it's passed back out and in. It was actually two square balls if the tight one at the end of the play is illegal as well.

RTE have missed it, they're still talking about the final touch. It wasn't for that, it was for the one in the buildup. Tg4 noticed it.

[weareros]

TG4 were incorrect. When Glennon caught the ball he was outside the square (screen grab below). He ran from a square ball position. But this is not soccer, as if he was running from an offside position to impact the play. The square ball rule only applies if the ball goes into the square. It never went into the square when Glennon caught it. There was no square ball rule to apply.

[tyrone86]

TG4 were incorrect. When Glennon caught the ball he was outside the square (screen grab below). He ran from a square ball position. But this is not soccer, as if he was running from an offside position to impact the play. The square ball rule only applies if the ball goes into the square. It never went into the square when Glennon caught it. There was no square ball rule to apply.

Maybe I'm wrong because it was a few years ago but I was always told that it's when the ball was kicked is when you judge a square ball. If he runs out and then in again it's still a square ball?!?

[Rossfan]

Seeing on TV there looked like the Officials got it wrong.
The red card was a reckless dangerous tackle on the Man so 2 wrongs there.
We got what we deserved from a poor performance, especially from 30 minutes onwards.
Tyrone looked like they had the extra man in the 2nd half and we gave them so much time and space.
Then despite our extra man Morgan picked out a free man on the terrace side about 7 times in a row with kick outs.
Loss of 2 coaches from last year telling I wonder?

[weareros]

TG4 were incorrect. When Glennon caught the ball he was outside the square (screen grab below). He ran from a square ball position. But this is not soccer, as if he was running from an offside position to impact the play. The square ball rule only applies if the ball goes into the square. It never went into the square when Glennon caught it. There was no square ball rule to apply.

Maybe I'm wrong because it was a few years ago but I was always told that it's when the ball was kicked is when you judge a square ball. If he runs out and then in again it's still a square ball?!?

True.But the ball has to enter the small rectangle or there's no square ball to judge. It didn't enter it. Andy Glennon caught it outside the small rectangle.

[Tubberman]

Seeing on TV there looked like the Officials got it wrong.
The red card was a reckless dangerous tackle on the Man so 2 wrongs there.
We got what we deserved from a poor performance, especially from 30 minutes onwards.
Tyrone looked like they had the extra man in the 2nd half and we gave them so much time and space.
Then despite our extra man Morgan picked out a free man on the terrace side about 7 times in a row with kick outs.
Loss of 2 coaches from last year telling I wonder?

If it is the changeover in backroom team, there's plenty of time for them to rectify it.

[Main Street]

He threw it into the net never mind the square ball. It wasn't a palm or a fist. Both hands were on the ball and he threw it in

That's the way all passes across the square are finished to the net nowadays.

Normally its a palm into the net at head height or so, as the ball was nearly below the knee it looked like he threw it in rather than palmed it in. Square ball call was tight but as Conn got a ridiculous red card it balanced itself out

Two passes before the finish was a very obvious square ball though. Man receives it deep in the square with his back to goal before it's passed back out and in. It was actually two square balls if the tight one at the end of the play is illegal as well.

RTE have missed it, they're still talking about the final touch. It wasn't for that, it was for the one in the buildup. Tg4 noticed it.

I think RTE proved beyond doubt that it was a legit goal and all present in the studio including Peter C. were agreed on that. But in any event Tyrone would have prevailed and were full value for their victory.

[Wildweasel74]

It's difficult to tell, player never would have got the ball In The first place if he didn't come across the square then out he didn't receive it in the square.