The Many Faces of US Politics...

Started by Tyrones own, March 20, 2009, 09:29:14 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

omochain

Quote from: foxcommander on May 09, 2017, 08:34:32 PM
Quote from: J70 on May 09, 2017, 02:18:39 AM
Quote from: foxcommander on May 07, 2017, 10:28:37 PM
and finally

the hypocrisy of the democrats is unbelievable. Here they go bleating on and on about interference in the US elections from a foreign country and then Obama goes public and endorses a candidate in the French Election.

but that's ok, right?

Publicly endorsing a candidate = unleashing your minions to dig up and slowly release embarrassing information and emails from one side only.

Gotcha.

There's no such thing as "good" interference and "bad" interference. Obama purposely waded into foreign election with the intention of using his profile to endorse a candidate. How is that any different to what democrats claim (and again, Obama is the only one who is proven to have interfered in an election) Russia did in the US election? Seriously. Your explanation doesn't quite work.

The democrats will obviously fail to grasp reality yet again and there's more than a stink of hypocrisy coming from their side.

I think I got my answer..
Foxy is Cozy Bear

Ball Hopper

Vacancy at FBI Director as Comey is fired by Trump.

heganboy

On sessions recommendation.

Too funny
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity

omochain

Quote from: whitey on May 09, 2017, 08:11:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on May 09, 2017, 07:47:49 PM
Maddow on Sally Yates and Flynn. Very murky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTFQNZMEM0k

Rachel Maddow is half a step removed from the National Enquirer


https://youtu.be/9xAUiaMpJvc


What did she report that was erroneous and you compare her reporting to the National Enquirer.  Another example of the false equivalency that you constantly spout.

omochain

Quote from: heganboy on May 09, 2017, 11:00:08 PM
On sessions recommendation.

Too funny

You couldn't make this stuff up... Comey gets Trump elected and now Sessions uses it against him to remove Comey from his investigation into Trump's russian romance.

gallsman

f**king hell, this is genuinely terrifying. Sessions recused himself, no?!

Deputy AG statement is incredible - primary reason for fitting was original announcement in July '16 that case was closed against HC.

Another hat for Jared Kushner to wear.

whitey

Quote from: omochain on May 09, 2017, 11:14:03 PM
Quote from: whitey on May 09, 2017, 08:11:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on May 09, 2017, 07:47:49 PM
Maddow on Sally Yates and Flynn. Very murky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTFQNZMEM0k

Rachel Maddow is half a step removed from the National Enquirer


https://youtu.be/9xAUiaMpJvc


What did she report that was erroneous and you compare her reporting to the National Enquirer.  Another example of the false equivalency that you constantly spout.

Rachel Maddow is a laughingstock

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/15/internet-destroys-rachel-maddow-after-trump-tax-return-scoop-fails-miserably/amp/

sid waddell

A president who is utterly out of control and drunk on his own power.

A president who beyond any doubt is attempting to pervert the course of justice.

And still the shills will shill for him.

A special prosecutor is an absolute necessity now.


whitey

This is pure comedy....all the Democrats calling for Comeys head last week are now up in arms that Trumps has fired him.  At this rate I don't think Trump will finish his first year in office (but I hope he gets another Supreme Court pick in the meantime)

omochain

Quote from: whitey on May 10, 2017, 12:26:17 AM
Quote from: omochain on May 09, 2017, 11:14:03 PM
Quote from: whitey on May 09, 2017, 08:11:00 PM
Quote from: seafoid on May 09, 2017, 07:47:49 PM
Maddow on Sally Yates and Flynn. Very murky

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTFQNZMEM0k

Rachel Maddow is half a step removed from the National Enquirer


https://youtu.be/9xAUiaMpJvc


What did she report that was erroneous and you compare her reporting to the National Enquirer.  Another example of the false equivalency that you constantly spout.

Rachel Maddow is a laughingstock

https://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/15/internet-destroys-rachel-maddow-after-trump-tax-return-scoop-fails-miserably/amp/

Whitey you make my point. Rachel gets a bit over excited about Trump's tax return and that's the equivalent of Ted Cruz's old man helping Lee Harvey Oswald shoot JFK?.
Come on..

seafoid

Quote from: sid waddell on May 10, 2017, 12:58:45 AM
A president who is utterly out of control and drunk on his own power.

A president who beyond any doubt is attempting to pervert the course of justice.

And still the shills will shill for him.

A special prosecutor is an absolute necessity now.

It is a car crash.
There is an awful lot of dirt on Trump and the FBI know it.

Delighted for the GOP.  Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch of sociopaths.

seafoid

#9071
https://www.theatlantic.com/amp/article/526056/

Meanwhile

Kellyanne Conway says the firing of FBI Director James Comey "had nothing to do with Russia" http://cnn.it/2q0oVYo

seafoid


J70

Quote from: foxcommander on May 09, 2017, 08:34:32 PM
Quote from: J70 on May 09, 2017, 02:18:39 AM
Quote from: foxcommander on May 07, 2017, 10:28:37 PM
and finally

the hypocrisy of the democrats is unbelievable. Here they go bleating on and on about interference in the US elections from a foreign country and then Obama goes public and endorses a candidate in the French Election.

but that's ok, right?

Publicly endorsing a candidate = unleashing your minions to dig up and slowly release embarrassing information and emails from one side only.

Gotcha.

There's no such thing as "good" interference and "bad" interference. Obama purposely waded into foreign election with the intention of using his profile to endorse a candidate. How is that any different to what democrats claim (and again, Obama is the only one who is proven to have interfered in an election) Russia did in the US election? Seriously. Your explanation doesn't quite work.

The democrats will obviously fail to grasp reality yet again and there's more than a stink of hypocrisy coming from their side.

On the one hand, a very public, honest, endorsement, which could be taken or left, depending on one's attitude to the endorser. Just like George Clooney or Ted Nugent endorsing someone in the states. You know where they're coming from and why they're coming down on a particular side.

On the other hand, a hidden, unclaimed attempt to influence an election by secretly targeting one side only by slowly releasing embarrassing emails.


J70

Quote from: whitey on May 10, 2017, 01:02:32 AM
This is pure comedy....all the Democrats calling for Comeys head last week are now up in arms that Trumps has fired him.  At this rate I don't think Trump will finish his first year in office (but I hope he gets another Supreme Court pick in the meantime)

Two separate arguments which happen to have had the same desired outcome, which matters, and which you're smart enough to understand.

Dems were pissed at Comey for his clumsy work over the emails, including the disowned allegations last week. Can you imagine the uproar had Obama given Comey the boot last year??

Trump didn't give a shit about how Comey hadn't the email situation, otherwise he would have fired him in January.

You REALLY think he won't last??