Antrim Hurling

[NAG1]

Proposal going to February Congress for any dissent to the referee on pitch or from the sideline will result in sliothar being forward 30m
If dissent happens at half time break , the game will restart with a 20m free to the opposition!
Davy may curb his enthusiasm for the refs

Maybe Davy is seeing how things have been for us traveling down South for years and the way we are treated by officials. Maybe not keen to be on the other side of it now, I hope he does highlight it and bring it to the fore.

That being said the dissent rule seems to have worked well in the football so no harm in trying something similar for the hurling.

[johnnycool]

Proposal going to February Congress for any dissent to the referee on pitch or from the sideline will result in sliothar being forward 30m
If dissent happens at half time break , the game will restart with a 20m free to the opposition!
Davy may curb his enthusiasm for the refs

Maybe Davy is seeing how things have been for us traveling down South for years and the way we are treated by officials. Maybe not keen to be on the other side of it now, I hope he does highlight it and bring it to the fore.

That being said the dissent rule seems to have worked well in the football so no harm in trying something similar for the hurling.

Exactly this.

Wee Davy made it all about him last year when it wasn't at all, it's just how Northern teams are refereed in general and has been like that for decades.

I see no issue with the 30 metre rule if the referees don't let it go to their heads when arse-hole spectators are roaring at them and they start punishing the players.

[Milltown Row2]

Proposal going to February Congress for any dissent to the referee on pitch or from the sideline will result in sliothar being forward 30m
If dissent happens at half time break , the game will restart with a 20m free to the opposition!
Davy may curb his enthusiasm for the refs

Maybe Davy is seeing how things have been for us traveling down South for years and the way we are treated by officials. Maybe not keen to be on the other side of it now, I hope he does highlight it and bring it to the fore.

That being said the dissent rule seems to have worked well in the football so no harm in trying something similar for the hurling.

Exactly this.

Wee Davy made it all about him last year when it wasn't at all, it's just how Northern teams are refereed in general and has been like that for decades.

I see no issue with the 30 metre rule if the referees don't let it go to their heads when arse-hole spectators are roaring at them and they start punishing the players.

It's very hard to decided if the mouthing is coming from the line or the cm of a difference from the line, behind the fence

If I was a manager and some clampit was giving it from behind the line and it costs my team 30 meters, I'd be letting that arsehole know very quickly

[Hectic]

The dissent thing was a great addition in football last year.

Don't know if referees felt the same but certainly seemed to cut back a lot of the shite from players and in particular coaches.