Irish mercenaries, unionist coat trailers and the Bard of Dunclug

[donalmac99]

Having sorted out the Donagh and donalmac99 PM saga to everyone's satisfaction (well everyone bar donal obviously), it is time to sort out the spurious Belfast Owl allegation. Donagh says he is 100% sure that donalmac99 is indeed Belfast Owl. I say prove it and if you can't, then everyone on the board has to stop calling donalmac99 Belfast Owl, otherwise they will be banned for a week.

donalmac99 is Belfast Owl.

no im not and i ask you to retract that allegation

Why? Are you ashamed of BelfastOwl or should BelfastOwl be ashamed by you?

post reported

[Donagh]

post reported

For which of the ten rules?

[donalmac99]

post reported

For which of the ten rules?

the mods sent us both the same pm, i refer you to that

i have no more to say on the matter except that i am asking you to retract your false allegation regarding my identity.

[donalmac99]

the irony is that your obsession with me is continuing to deflect attention from the councillior 

Anyone looking to see the defination of irony should go back to see how this "conversation" started  

An all round gem is this lad  

anyone looking for the spelling and meaning of 'definition' should....................too easy 

[Donagh]

the mods sent us both the same pm, i refer you to that

Donagh has agreed to cease the badgering of donalmac99's every post

In case you didn't notice, I never addressed your post and as I started this thread in the first place, I think I have the right to respond to posts on it.

[Zapatista]

You have the right to remain silent.

[Donagh]

I had it confirmed to me a while back by a member of OWC that donalmac is in fact BelfastOwl.

However after I first revealed this here and by coincidence the false allegations were then made against me by donalmac, I was banned from OWC. An even stranger coincidence shortly after was the 'sinister' allegation by Mac on OWC that a member of OWC was being intimidated by someone from here. I wonder did Mac ask for proof or has someone over on OWC been telling porkies as well.

Anyway the upshot is that as I have been locked out of my account on OWC I cannot at this time prove that donalmac is BelfastOwl. But as soon as get proof or could be bothered paying £5 to OWC, I will post it. In the meantime, if anyone wants evidence that donalmac is less than stringent when it comes to telling the truth or is in fact a member of OWC a cursory reading of his posts since he joined should be enough.

[orangeman]

You have the right to remain silent.

But anything you do say will be...........     

[his holiness nb]

Its clear this belfastowl guy is out to get a particular few "enemies" of the OWC barred from here.
This is his sole mission here.

The sooner mods realise this and boot him out the better.

A further irony is that he hides behind the name "belfastowl" on OWC and wont give his true name whilst slagging everyone on here for doing the same 

[full back]

Its clear this belfastowl guy is out to get a particular few "enemies" of the OWC barred from here.
This is his sole mission here.

The sooner mods realise this and boot him out the better.

I think you have just about summed it up

[Zapatista]

To be honest I couldn't give two hoots about this not so wise an owl

[donalmac99]

I had it confirmed to me a while back by a member of OWC that donalmac is in fact BelfastOwl.

However after I first revealed this here and by coincidence the false allegations were then made against me by donalmac, I was banned from OWC. An even stranger coincidence shortly after was the 'sinister' allegation by Mac on OWC that a member of OWC was being intimidated by someone from here. I wonder did Mac ask for proof or has someone over on OWC been telling porkies as well.

Anyway the upshot is that as I have been locked out of my account on OWC I cannot at this time prove that donalmac is BelfastOwl. But as soon as get proof or could be bothered paying £5 to OWC, I will post it. In the meantime, if anyone wants evidence that donalmac is less than stringent when it comes to telling the truth or is in fact a member of OWC a cursory reading of his posts since he joined should be enough.

post reported for, yet again, making fasle and unfounded  allegations regarding my identity. I would ask the mods to either ask donagh for hard proof or that his allegations be treated as false and that he is suspended for constant rule breaking. Remember as even Main Street stated, unless there is proof regarding an allegation then it must be treated as false.

Again , agreeing with Main Street: I would expect in future that the terms of accepting a retraction should include a complete withdrawal of said allegation and a complete retraction of any insinuation that there was a reason for the allegation

[Donagh]

post reported for, yet again, making fasle and unfounded  allegations regarding my identity. I would ask the mods to either ask donagh for hard proof or that his allegations be treated as false and that he is suspended for constant rule breaking. Remember as even Main Street stated, unless there is proof regarding an allegation then it must be treated as false.

Which of the ten rules are you claiming that I have broken?

[donalmac99]

post reported for, yet again, making fasle and unfounded  allegations regarding my identity. I would ask the mods to either ask donagh for hard proof or that his allegations be treated as false and that he is suspended for constant rule breaking. Remember as even Main Street stated, unless there is proof regarding an allegation then it must be treated as false.

Which of the ten rules are you claiming that I have broken?

i refer you to the pm sent by the mods.

[Donagh]

post reported for, yet again, making fasle and unfounded  allegations regarding my identity. I would ask the mods to either ask donagh for hard proof or that his allegations be treated as false and that he is suspended for constant rule breaking. Remember as even Main Street stated, unless there is proof regarding an allegation then it must be treated as false.

Which of the ten rules are you claiming that I have broken?

i refer you to the pm sent by the mods.

I've read them and I can't see anything. Perhaps you would like to reproduce them?

Otherwise, stop badgering me or I'll have to report you for "feuding". Now back to the topic under discussion on the thread title.