Polanski

[stew]

To me he should be held accountable for the drugging, sodomy and rape of a then 13 year old child. Your thoughts?


SHOULD Roman Polanski be extradited to the US over his statutory rape of a 13-year-old girl in Los Angeles in March 1977? It's an interesting legal question. But it's not the question that is driving the trans-Atlantic furore that followed the film director's arrest in Switzerland last weekend.

Instead, various prejudices and unresolved battles are being projected on to l'affaire Polanski, robbing it of its legal complexities and turning it into a proxy culture war in which clapped-out conservatives and disoriented liberals are hurling intellectual (and not-so-intellectual) grenades at one another.

Polanski, the Polish-French maker of some decent films (Chinatown, Rosemary's Baby, The Pianist) and some awful ones too (Frantic, The Dance of the Vampires), pleaded guilty in a Los Angeles court in 1977 to having sexual intercourse with a minor.

On March 10, 1977, then 44, he had taken Samantha Gailey, a 13-year-old child model, to the home of Jack Nicholson in Mulholland, California, where he said he was going to take photographs of her for the French edition of Vogue. After taking the photos, he gave Gailey champagne and a sedative and performed oral sex, intercourse and sodomy on her while she said: "No, I don't want to do this." The original charges against Polanski were "rape by use of drugs, sodomy, and a lewd and lascivious act with a child under the age of 14". As part of a plea bargain Polanski got it reduced to "sexual intercourse with a minor".

When he realised that even this charge could land him in jail, he fled the US.

But the newspaper commentary and feverish diplomatic activity that greeted his arrest in Switzerland have not been concerned with the facts of the case, the question of legal precedents or the issue of justice.

Instead, Polanski has been turned into a symbol. For conservatives, still convinced that the 1960s are the root of all evil, he is symbolic of the perversions allegedly unleashed by the naked, hippie, free-love liberations of the countercultural period, with his rape of a 13-year-old girl seen virtually as the logical end product of legalising drug use and encouraging people to be sexually experimental.

For liberals he is a symbol of tortured European artistry who is being victimised by an ugly and prudish America. For US officials, Polanski symbolises European degeneracy and they fantasise that returning him to an American jail will be a victory for Reaganite decency over French moral turpitude.

For French officials, meanwhile, Polanski is a symbol of Europe's gallant recovery from its dark past (Polanski and his family, Polish Jews, were persecuted during the Holocaust), who is being tortured anew by "the darker side of America, the side that scares us all".

Just as Mia Farrow's Rosemary was a vessel for the devil in Rosemary's Baby, so Polanski has been turned into a vessel for all sorts of political jibber-jabber today.

It is striking how quickly the discussion of what Polanski, one man, did to Gailey, one girl, twists and turns into a discussion about competing moral values and even clashing national standards. For 60s-baiting conservatives, Polanski has long been a rotting symbol of everything that is wrong with that decade.

Both Polanski's experience of a terrible crime in 1969 and his execution of a crime in 1977 are held up as evidence of the darker side of the 60s and why a diet of sexual looseness, rock'n'roll and drugs is a Bad Thing.

In 1969, Polanski's wife Sharon Tate, a beautiful actress, was brutally murdered by Charles Manson's cult, the Family. Family members stabbed to death Tate and four others at Polanski's home in California while he was away; Tate was 8 1/2 months pregnant.

That crime, carried out by a tiny cult of weird hippies, has been cited by US conservatives as the neat conclusion to a decade in which traditional values had collapsed under the weight of a new generation that was less respectful than its 50s forebears; it was the "dark side of the California dream", as one writer argued, a product of the "political, social and cultural turbulence of the 1960s".

The Manson crimes have been analysed more than any other serial-killing episodes in US history because they have been elevated from the realm of crime to the world of politics and morality, used by conservatives to absolve themselves of any responsibility for the collapse of traditional values in the 60s (instead it was all the fault of the Beatles, the Beach Boys, drugs and other things loved by Manson) and to depict sexual liberation and social experimentation as having necessarily brutal consequences.

Yet just as Polanski was a victim of alleged 60s excesses, so he was a rapacious product of those excesses, too. Any sympathy for Polanski dried up following his conviction for unlawful intercourse in 1977. This, too, conservatives argued, was part of the degeneracy of the American west coast in the mid to late-20th century; it sprang from a determination to "push back the boundaries of sexual liberation", as one report said this week.

Some American law enforcers and right-wing commentators seem to imagine that having Polanski returned to the US will finally end the odious influence of the 60s on society. Under the headline "Why we dislike the French" one conservative columnist asks how liberal Europe can "support a child rapist".

Yet if this attempt to write off 60s sexual liberation (some of which was progressive, some of which was solipsistic) on the back of Polanski's past is bad, then the defence of Polanski by European government officials and commentators is even worse.

They are motivated not by anything remotely related to legal norms or questions of justice but by a snobbish anti-Americanism in which Polanski (who is probably a bit of a creep) becomes recast as a paragon of European decency against hung-up America.

So determined are some liberal observers to use l'affaire Polanski to get one over on the US that they have even forgotten about their normal role of stoking up hysterical panics about pedophiles and have re-depicted Polanski's encounter with Gailey as just an over-exuberant heavy-petting session. European liberals rallied to Polanski's defence against what Frederic Mitterrand, nephew of the former French president and a friend of Polanski, described as a senseless and outrageous arrest that springs from "the darker side of America, the one that scares us all".

In short, Polanski is not merely being pursued under an old legalistic arrest warrant, the kind that exists for many fugitives, but is the European victim of evil America.

One French commentator says the US is "acting out some kind of prudish revenge" against a "great talent who never abided by American rules". Here, Polanski's actions in 1977 are presented as a bit of rule-breaking and anyone who thinks he should be punished for them is clearly an un-arty prude.

But whatever you think of the arrest warrant against Polanski and the motivations of US law enforcers, it is not prudish to think that performing oral sex and sodomy on a drunk 13-year-old is unacceptable behaviour.

The difference between the liberal media reaction to Polanski and to Gary Glitter - the big-haired glam-rock star who in 1997 was discovered to have child porn on his computer - is striking. Where Glitter has been turned by the British media into a symbol of the pedophilic evil that is allegedly stalking our land, Polanski is presented as the misunderstood artist who is the real victim here, of a "money-grabbing American mother and a publicity-hungry Californian judge".

So keen are some liberals to mark themselves out as Not American that they are effectively saying: "Polanski might be a pedophile, but he's our pedophile."

But perhaps the worst aspect of the Polanski affair is the competition of victimhoods. It is testimony to the domination of the victim culture in society that Polanski haters and Polanski defenders have used the language of victimology to make their case.

For many American and British commentators this is all about Gailey, whom they have transformed into the archetypal victim of the alleged great evil of our time, child abuse. "Remember: Polanski raped a child", says a headline in Salon online.

For European observers, by contrast, Polanski's actions can be explained by his victimised past, especially during the Holocaust. We have to understand his "life tragedies" and how they moulded him, says one filmmaker.

Anne Applebaum, a US commentator who spends much of her time in Europe, says Polanski fled the US in 1978 because of his "understandable fear of irrational punishment. Polanski's mother died in Auschwitz. His father survived in Mauthausen. He himself survived the Krakow ghetto." (Applebaum fails to disclose that she is married to Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, who is campaigning against Polanski's extradition.)

This spat in victimology confirms that the politics of victimhood dominates debate on both sides of the Atlantic, but in the Anglo-American sphere it is the victim of child abuse that is most sacrosanct, while in Europe it is the victims of the Holocaust who enjoy the most unquestioned moral authority, to the extent that Polanski's fleeing of the US can be excused as a latent reaction by a tortured man to the horrors of Auschwitz.

L'affaire Polanski has become a culture war that dare not speak its name, a pale imitation of the debates about values that have emerged at various times during the past 50 years.

As a result we are none the wiser about the legal usefulness of 30-year-old arrest warrants or contemporary extradition laws, as observers have instead turned Polanski into a ventriloquist's dummy or a voodoo doll for the purposes of letting off cheap moral steam.

Brendan O'Neill edits online magazine Spiked. His satire on the green movement, Can I Recycle My Granny and 39 Other Eco-Dilemmas, is published by Hodder & Stoughton.

Your Comments:0 Comment(s)
Story ToolsPost A Comment Share This Article Email To A Friend Post A CommentWe welcome your comments on this story. Comments are submitted for possible publication on the condition that they may be edited. Please provide a screen name and suburb/location - these will be published. We also require a working email address - not for publication, but for verification. Read our publication guidelines.

* Required fields
Screen Name:* Required   Location:   Email Address:* Required   Your Comments:* Required     Remember my details (So you don't have to retype your details each time you send feedback)  Email me if my comment is published   Share This ArticleFrom here you can use the Social Web links to save The war for Roman Polanski to a social bookmarking site.

del.icio.us Digg it Furl Netscape Yahoo MyWeb StumbleUpon Google Technorati BlinkList Newsvine ma.gnolia reddit Windows Live Tailrank Slashdot Email To A Friend* Required fields
Recipient's Name:* Required  Recipient's Email:* Required  Your Name:* Required  Your Email:* Required  Email Format:* HTML Text Only  Your Comments:* Required   
Information provided on this page will not be used for any other purpose than to notify the recipient of the article you have chosen.


Ads By GooglePrepare to be Shocked
Millions have already taken this amazing test. What's your RealAge?
RealAge.comArtery Clearing Secret
Hugh Downs reports on breakthrough artery clearing secret.
www.bottomlinesecrets.comStress Relief - Dianetics
Free selection from Dianetics, the bestseller by L. Ron Hubbard.
Dianetics.orgLatest Opinion
Brendan O'Neill: The war for Roman Polanski
Henry Ergas: Bad economics not harmless
Christopher Hitchens: Pig-ignorant officials slaughter swine
Peter Sutton: Let's not shut our eyes to truth
Peter van Onselen: Leader can't just ignore his MPs
Tony Makin: Debt monster that will feed on itself
Your Vote

The Australian's Online Poll
Do you think Australia has adequate systems in place to warn of a tsunami?
Vote | Your details
Special reports

In-Depth sections
The Australian's in-depth sections cover a range of news topics, including Budget 2009, Swine Flu, the Victorian bushfires, and the global financial crisis.
Follow The Australian on Twitter
Digital editions of The Australian

   
Subscribe to our digital editions. More Digital Editions

RSS Feeds
Opinion The Nation Business Sport Media Travel Higher Ed Defence The Arts Aviation Property Mining & Energy More Feeds & Explanation
In The Australian Today
Business
Tighter rein on short selling
Andrew Main SHARE investors will be forced to disclose their short-selling positions to the corporate regulator from April next year.

Shortage of detail on turmoil
US lead sends shares tumbling
Australian IT
NEHTA releases strategic plan
Karen Dearne THE National E-Health Transition Authority has released a strategic plan repositioning itself as an implementation agency.

NBN Co to buy telco assets
ANZ to offer free internet
Media
Gillard biographer review slammed
Caroline Overington THE publisher of Penguin books in Australia, Ben Ball, has accused the new editor of the Melbourne-based literary magazine The Monthly o...

Editor remembered as driving force
Hoges' win on tax secrets
Higher Education
Universities face academic exodus
Andrew Trounson AUSTRALIA'S academics are disillusioned by corporate management cultures, threatening to drive many away from the profession.

UWA takes IP dispute to High Court
Melb Uni, MBS merger plans canned
Also in The Australian
The World
Women free after Shalit video
Correspondents in Ramallah NINETEEN Palestinian women prisoners were released last night in a breakthrough swap for a video of Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit.

Iran's nuclear deal prompts doubt
Obama Olympic pitch is Chicago's hope
The Nation
Drought in funding for basin plans
Siobhain Ryan THE nation's grand plans for Murray-Darling infrastructure upgrades have hit their own funding drought.

Reinado's widow misses her rebel
Top court eyes joint care
Opinion
Bully sermon rouses dissenters
Peter van Onselen MALCOLM Turnbull is fighting his way out of a tough spot over the ETS, but this tactic will probably come at a cost to his leadership.

Chris Sarra: Positive not punitive the best approach
Lenore Taylor: After the storm, a deluge of debt
Lifestyle
Backlash looms on smoking, drinking
Christian Kerr AUSTRALIANS are overwhelmingly opposed to government plans to tell them to drink and smoke less and cut down on junk food in the wake of...

Tangled web
Fish sauce converts Thompson

[J70]

Of course he should be held accountable.

[dillinger]

Long post, short answer. Yes.

[Capt Pat]

I think he was held accountable for it to some extent. He is being sent back because he skipped out on a 90 day psychiatric treatment programme of which he served half the time. the other thing is the judge was supposed to impose a suspended sentence as part of the plea bargain but then decided not to go along with the original agreement. So Polanski decided to skip town back to Europe. The thing is if Polanski goes back to America he will probably appeal and this will mean a re trial. Given that he pleaded guilty originally what will happen then if he decides not to plead guilty.

[Shamrock Shore]

Unlike Whoppie Goldberg I don't believe in "rape rape".

He should be sent back to the States and do serious time for what he did.

[ardmhachaabu]

Unlike Whoppie Goldberg I don't believe in "rape rape".

He should be sent back to the States and do serious time for what he did.

Yes, that's exactly what should happen him

[longrunsthefox]

I used to have a serious obsession for Charles Manson and The Family 

[J70]

I think he was held accountable for it to some extent. He is being sent back because he skipped out on a 90 day psychiatric treatment programme of which he served half the time. the other thing is the judge was supposed to impose a suspended sentence as part of the plea bargain but then decided not to go along with the original agreement. So Polanski decided to skip town back to Europe. The thing is if Polanski goes back to America he will probably appeal and this will mean a re trial. Given that he pleaded guilty originally what will happen then if he decides not to plead guilty.

There was no trial - he pleaded out the first time. The judge was under no obligation to honour any deal reached in the plea bargain. Polanski had a right to change his plea to "not guilty" and face and defend himself in a trial, not to abscond because the judge didn't like the deal he made.

[orangeman]

Court reveals Polanski settlement 

The film-maker has not set foot in the US since 1978
Roman Polanski agreed to pay his victim of sexual assault $500,000, 15 years after he fled the US, according to court documents released to the media.

The French-Polish director is being held in Switzerland on a US arrest warrant over his 1977 conviction for unlawful sex with a 13-year-old girl.

The confidential deal between Mr Polanski and the victim, Samantha Geimer, was reached in October 1993.

It was disclosed because of a two-year struggle to get the film-maker to pay.

Mr Polanski - who faces extradition to the US - was detained in Switzerland as he travelled from France to collect a lifetime achievement award at the Zurich Film Festival.

The last court filing in August 1996 stated that he owed Ms Geimer $604,416.22, including interest. The documents were made available to the media on Friday.

The court records did not reveal whether the 76-year-old director had ever paid, according to the Associated Press.

The director pleaded guilty to unlawful sex with an under-age girl following a plea bargain - he had originally been charged with six offences including rape and sodomy.

Victim sued

He left the US in 1978 before he could be sentenced and has not returned to the country since.

David Finkle, the film-maker's lawyer, said he was unable to recall details of the case and declined comment. Ms Geimer and her family have also been unavailable for comment.

She sued Mr Polanski in December 1988, alleging sexual assault, infliction of emotional distress and seduction.

But in January this year she asked a US court to drop charges against him, saying the continued publication of details "causes harm to me, my husband and children".

Schwarzenegger speaks out

The arrest of Mr Polanski, who won an Oscar in 2002 for The Pianist, a harrowing story of Nazi-occupied Warsaw, has prompted an outcry among some politicians and 0Hollywood heavyweights.

But on Friday, California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger said the film-maker should not get special treatment because he is a "big-time movie director".

A petition has been signed by film-makers including Pedro Almodovar and Stephen Frears, and actors including Monica Bellucci and Fanny Ardant, expressing dismay at Mr Polanski's arrest.

Other Hollywood luminaries, including film producer Harvey Weinstein, have called for Mr Polanski's release.

On Tuesday, US prosecutors said the 76-year-old had been on an Interpol "wanted list" for years.

[Tony Baloney]

The law shouldn't make any dispensation for the famous although I do question them pursuing a man in his 70s.

[longrunsthefox]

The law shouldn't make any dispensation for the famous although I do question them pursuing a man in his 70s.

There are men  in their 70s still at that child abuse. can't see why you should get to a certian age and then it be forgot about. Should be held accountable and brought to court and maybe then old age/ health  taken into account when being sentenced.

[tyroneman]

Fcuk him.

Crime = Time

Imagine it was your daughter / sister / mother

Since when does drugging, raping and sodomising any woman, let alone a 13 year old girl become something for liberals to debate the morals and rightness / wrongness of.

If he did it he needs jail for 20+ whether he's 20 or 90

[tyroneman]

Why?

[Donagh]

I thought he was charged with underage consensual sex and he fled the country after a bit of shady goings between the prosecutor and judge?

[longrunsthefox]

Why?

What?