Selective video evidence

[tyssam5]

So what about Galvin planting a knee in the Corkman's head on the ground? No significant enough to trouble the video reviewers?

[Frank Casey]

So what about Galvin planting a knee in the Corkman's head on the ground? No significant enough to trouble the video reviewers?

Seems that same pesky wasp that attacked Paddy Russell last year attacked the poor Cork land....................shure what was a fellow supposed to do?

[Tyrone Dreamer]

The system is a joke. How the hell did Ricey got a 50% longer ban for touching Galvin than Mullan got for sticking his knee into someone on the ground?

[laceer]

The system is a joke. How the hell did Ricey got a 50% longer ban for touching Galvin than Mullan got for sticking his knee into someone on the ground?

was thinking this myself.

can not see any reason why but there's no point complaining now - ricey's back when it matters. Mullan and Fergal Doherty aint

[Fear ón Srath Bán]

The system is a joke. How the hell did Ricey got a 50% longer ban for touching Galvin than Mullan got for sticking his knee into someone on the ground?

It doesn't matter too much TD, we're going to make them pay, and pay big-time! 

[Maguire01]

How come if Joe Brolly can get all of this footage from the BBC, do the GAA not get all available footage first (from all broadcasters), and review it in full, so that they can make an informed decision on sanctions? Surely that would make the whole process more credible and reduce the likelihood of successful appeals.

[cadhlancian]

Just after watching the Cork and Kerry game..........question is, what will the boys in Croke Park make of some this? Galvin and Cadogan should have been booked, and then he booked 3 guys who should have walked, and should get suspended if the laws are to be consistant, namely Shields , Donaghy and not sure who hit BJ Walsh first in that schomozzle( Murphy?)

[longrunsthefox]

Let's see how they deal with Mayo player struck McMenamin before Joe McMahon got sent off... needs to be same for all the counties 

[DuffleKing]

If this discriminitive nonsense continues is there scope for players refusing to play in front of the live cameras?

Seems the your chances of suspension will be greatly reduced if there's no live cameras

[cadhlancian]

If this discriminitive nonsense continues is there scope for players refusing to play in front of the live cameras?

Seems the your chances of suspension will be greatly reduced if there's no live cameras

I would say so! Its Bullshiittt. I said when I started this thread last year, that it would be fine, IF the powers be, looked at EVERY game, meaning there would be cameras at EVERY game,,,,,,,,,,,this will never happen though

[cadhlancian]

What a load of D..g! No "extra" action taken over the Kerry V Cork game at the weekend, this is bordering on fuccking ridiculous. Various incidents that were not dealt with appropriately by the ref at the time total horsec..k

[muppet]

Let's see how they deal with Mayo player struck McMenamin before Joe McMahon got sent off... needs to be same for all the counties

He got upgraded to a red. Does that make everything ok?

[Tyrone Dreamer]

Let's see how they deal with Mayo player struck McMenamin before Joe McMahon got sent off... needs to be same for all the counties

He got upgraded to a red. Does that make everything ok?

No it just proves that they only review Tyrone games. 7 players have been banned in the last NFL in the last 2 years and every one of them has been in a Tyrone game. If anyone believe's that these offences only occur in Tyrone games they are kidding themselves.

In the last round of games punches were thrown in the Cork Kerry game which were at least on par with what Justy McMahon got suspended for. In the league last year at least 2 incidents were highlighted in the Monaghan Kildare game which should have been sendings off on the day. No further action was taken in relation to any off these incidents. I'm sure there have been others to. As no one knows what the process is for reviewing games and how the CCC operates its difficult to say why some incidents are reviewed and some aren't.

Its also very difficult when you operate in a league were some games are subject to video evidence and some aren't. It isn't a level playing field for all players and counties which surely gives an unfair advantage to teams not subject to video evidence. Throw into the mix that suspensions could be doubled later in the year based on earlier sendings off using video evidence and you have a very fair disadvantage for a few teams who are subject to video evidence.