NFL Division 1 2024

[trailer]

I've read this a few times but I'd have thought if this was the case TV cameras would have caught it and it'd have been replayed but I didn't see it?

There was a short replay of the afters before he was given the red, looked like a bit of a schmozzle between Conn and a couple of players, but wasn't really conclusive either. Would've need to see it a few times to make out what actually happened.

https://www.tg4.ie/en/player/categories/sport-tv-player/play/?pid=6345776284112&title=T%C3%ADr%20Eoghain%20v%20Ros%20Com%C3%A1in&series=GAA%20Beo&genre=Sport&pcode=682043

Go to  1:08.30
Handbags. Nothing more, but the linesman is there with a good view as well, have to think whatever he said had an impact on the red card.

What is strange is the first player who jumped in to push conn should have been given a red for becoming the 3 man. At the end there were 3 men pushing conn

This is what Tyrone player got the line for against Armagh. The GAA and referees aren't even trying to hide it anymore. When Dublin and Kerry kicked the shite out of each other last year it was held up as men going toe to toe with no quarter given. But If Tyrone is involved it is disgraceful unsavoury scenes that have no place in our game.

Kilpatrick's red card - An Lár Choiste Cheannais na gComortaisí took Disciplinary Action against Conn Mac Giolla Phádraig, alleging a breach of Riail 7.2 (b), Category III, T.O. 2023, that is to say, "Behaving in any way which is dangerous to an opponent".

Just watch this weekend and let's see how many times players from other counties are sent off for this infraction.

f**king scandalous.

https://www.rte.ie/player/series/saturday-gaa-live/10001784-00-0000?epguid=IH10003532-24-0001
Go to 43.24 ( or 16.52 on Game Clock) if you can stomach the RTE player

same type of tackle IMO .. thou tackler had more time to 'line' it up .

Never would consider either a red or even worthy of a yellow on there own

There you go.

What does this even mean? "Behaving in any way which is dangerous to an opponent" Surely every single contact is dangerous to an opponent? Regardless if it is meant. Hitting someone anywhere on their body could endanger them.
I'm expecting an absolute avalanche of red cards this weekend.

[tyrone08]

Was the Tyrone players not given reds against us for dangerous neck high moves in the bit of handbags that day? Not that I thought any of them were even close to a red card in fairness to ye.

No at that time the 4 tyrone men where red carded due to contributing to melee I.e 3rd man in.

It is ridiculous however going by that Armagh/tyrone game the Roscommon lad should have gotten a red for 3rd man jn

[trailer]

Seeing as the Junta who control this board have censored my topic on Tyrone injustices, we are left with no choice but to completely disrupt the flow on this topic by highlighting everything here.

[tyrone08]

I do laugh when I hear talk about bringing in new rules to "save" gaelic football.

You can't get 2 refs to call a game consistently never mind bringing in more rules.

Focus on getting the refs to apply the rules correctly. This is no cheap shot at refs however everyone can see game in game out the vast differences in application of the current rules

[JoG2]

Holy fcuk, this thread is brilliant atm. It's like a wranglers / tucked in lumberjack shirt wearing support group. Keep her going

[Milltown Row2]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

[trailer]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

Well if you say so. Lets just see how many reds are handed out over the weekend for similar tackle.

As for your line about giving the ref a decision to make... that is literally the f**king job of the referee. In your world nobody on the field should ever make a challenge or have a shot on goal. f**k sake. 

[Milltown Row2]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

Well if you say so. Lets just see how many reds are handed out over the weekend for similar tackle.

As for your line about giving the ref a decision to make... that is literally the f**king job of the referee. In your world nobody on the field should ever make a challenge or have a shot on goal. f**k sake. 

I'll talk you through it slowly

You can only tackle the ball
shoulder on shoulder is the only physical challenge in the games (via rule book)
High dangerous tackles (like this one) based on the ref's view of it can be a red card, he consulted his linesman who possibly agreed with him.

To turn it around, its the job of a player to tackle properly not like some goat on the loose from his pen

The ref did his job and his decision was to send him off for a daft reckless challenge

Another ref might have deemed it so, but even after the appeal it was deemed a red.

Move on..

[trailer]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

Well if you say so. Lets just see how many reds are handed out over the weekend for similar tackle.

As for your line about giving the ref a decision to make... that is literally the f**king job of the referee. In your world nobody on the field should ever make a challenge or have a shot on goal. f**k sake. 

I'll talk you through it slowly

You can only tackle the ball
shoulder on shoulder is the only physical challenge in the games (via rule book)
High dangerous tackles (like this one) based on the ref's view of it can be a red card, he consulted his linesman who possibly agreed with him.

To turn it around, its the job of a player to tackle properly not like some goat on the loose from his pen

The ref did his job and his decision was to send him off for a daft reckless challenge

Another ref might have deemed it so, but even after the appeal it was deemed a red.

Move on..

Ok lets see how it goes this weekend.
Also I won't "move on"

[tbrick18]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

 
That should definately be added to the rule book.
If you do something stupid, straight red. Brillaint!

[JoG2]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

Well if you say so. Lets just see how many reds are handed out over the weekend for similar tackle.

As for your line about giving the ref a decision to make... that is literally the f**king job of the referee. In your world nobody on the field should ever make a challenge or have a shot on goal. f**k sake. 

I'll talk you through it slowly

You can only tackle the ball
shoulder on shoulder is the only physical challenge in the games (via rule book)
High dangerous tackles (like this one) based on the ref's view of it can be a red card, he consulted his linesman who possibly agreed with him.

To turn it around, its the job of a player to tackle properly not like some goat on the loose from his pen

The ref did his job and his decision was to send him off for a daft reckless challenge

Another ref might have deemed it so, but even after the appeal it was deemed a red.

Move on..

This, unless 3 or 4 men are slapping the fcuk out of the man in possession at the same time, then, it's a free for over carrying. It's in the rule book (I'm assuming)

[Milltown Row2]

In real time it looks like a red, in slow mo it looks like a harsh red or a lucky yellow. The reality is he shouldn't have given the referee a decision to make, completely reckless with absolutely no intention to play the ball, high tackle also. And in their defence, not when they were making a break or counter...

Should be a red just for being stupid

Well if you say so. Lets just see how many reds are handed out over the weekend for similar tackle.

As for your line about giving the ref a decision to make... that is literally the f**king job of the referee. In your world nobody on the field should ever make a challenge or have a shot on goal. f**k sake. 

I'll talk you through it slowly

You can only tackle the ball
shoulder on shoulder is the only physical challenge in the games (via rule book)
High dangerous tackles (like this one) based on the ref's view of it can be a red card, he consulted his linesman who possibly agreed with him.

To turn it around, its the job of a player to tackle properly not like some goat on the loose from his pen

The ref did his job and his decision was to send him off for a daft reckless challenge

Another ref might have deemed it so, but even after the appeal it was deemed a red.

Move on..

This, unless 3 or 4 men are slapping the fcuk out of the man in possession at the same time, then, it's a free for over carrying. It's in the rule book (I'm assuming)

If they are attempting to slap the ball out of the hand that's ok, if they are slapping the player or dragging his arm, it's a foul.

Look, and it's very simple. If referees blew for every 'foul' people would stop playing and watching.

My perception, your perception as a fan/supporter will always be different. There's only one person though with the whistle, whether he's correct or not doesn't matter at the time, it's called and dealt with, so while trailer doesn't want to move on, there really is no other option.

I've watched this incident a few times and the ref didn't do much wrong. One attempt to see it, made a judgement and sent him off. Don't watch these things in slow mo, watch it at the same speed and make a call, 9 times outta ten there might be a different call.

The ref from the hurling club final is still getting online abuse, he didn't have his best game I'll admit that but the players made the game tetchy which doesn't help

[Blowitupref]

Mayo team to play Dublin tomorrow

Colm Reape
Jack Coyne
Rory Brickenden
Sam Callinan
Paddy Durcan
David McBrien
Eoghan McLaughlin
Jordan Flynn
Jack Carney
Conor Reid
Fergal Boland
Bob Tuohy
Aidan O'Shea
Paul Towey
Ryan O'Donoghue

[GalwayBayBoy]

Injury bug continues to spread. No Comer again and no Shane Walsh.

[Schkite]

Jack O'Connor bringing back the Cliffords earlier than planned, feck sake