We will have to agree to disagree on this. Two Dunloy sideline officials questioned and called out bullshit last night. Nothing doing. IMO, had that been a lesser team, they'd have been punished. Tolerance levels are different for various teams. Referees can claim indifference, but it's widespread amongst them, there is bias and a pick on teams. Fair enough, that's human nature, plenty of teams and individuals dislike each other, but don't deny it!!
And by saying it's down to the referee and his discretion, you are 100% correct. But this also feeds my point, tolerance levels are higher for other teams than some!!
And by saying it's down to the referee and his discretion, you are 100% correct. But this also feeds my point, tolerance levels are higher for other teams than some!!
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on July 29, 2026, 10:48:59 AMNot discussing last nights game....
Having played the game and managed I can understand at this level that frustration is normal, people will complain, people will question and people on the sideline will feel aggrieved, the 30 meter rule has been brought in to combat abuse to the referee, its totatly down to the referee to decide what crosses the line of frustration and targeted abuse..
A chat and explanation can temper that, I personally have my level of tolerance and its the same for both, these are mine, others will have theirs..
Taking away passion and bite isn't what we (we as in a supporter of our games) want, understanding abuse from frustration is (for me) the difference in moving the ball or having that little chat..
I'm bored with the chat on how the elite teams/players have bias though, I've seen that a few times and it's bollocks![]()