Convicted paedophile to be beheaded and crucified

[mountainboii]

As disgusting as the crime is, beheadings and crucifixions have no place in a civilised society. It's barbaric, medieval behaviour.

[Rossfan]

Absolutely.
And to think the Hypocrites  Bush/Blair invaded Afghanistan to stop this kind of thing 

[Square Ball]

should have just cut his dick off and let him bleed to death, the more pain the better for him

[longrunsthefox]

Behaving like savages to punish a savage is not the way to go. Lock him up and throw away the key.

[BennyHarp]

Ok I am against the death penalty in all its forms but I follow the logic of the first part of the punishment. Then they are going to crucify the body, WTF?? What is that going to do for anyone? So just to point out the obvious, I would say the people deciding on that sentence are potentially as bad as the perp/perv. Doing things to dead bodies is not a healthy sign.

I agree, what's the point in crucifying a beheaded body? No problem with the fecker getting beheaded though!!

[ziggysego]

Whilst I've no sympathy for the man, I'm against the death penalty. As others have stated here, he should serve life and life meaning life. It won't be easy for him in prison once the other inmates know what he has been convicted for.

Agree with this and also the small chance of getting it wrong and killing the wrong person.

No sympathy for the c**t. Doing the above would effectively be a death sentence anyway so good enough. He would die either way which is what he deserves.

If it were my child I would want him dead...

Most people would feel the same, I know I would if it was my child. However that is an emotive response and they are dangerous when looking for justice. Justice will soon become revenge and then where do we go to as a so-called civilised society?

Better he is thrown in prison for life, to life with what he has done. He should also be stripped of whatever 'luxuries' other prisoners are afforded too.

[haranguerer]

Very easy for everyone to come on here and say a worse punishment than the one before to look righteous. And if the victim was anyone I knew, no punishment could be too severe.

But does anyone think that paedophiles are normal? On here there was a debate about homosexuality a while ago, and the consensus was that people are born with certain sexual preferences, and these cant be changed, no matter what Iris says. So presumably paedophiles are also born this way. And this being the case, should they all be crucified? Or shock horror, should treatment be sought for them - before they commit crimes like this?

Just a thought...

[ardmhachaabu]

Whilst I've no sympathy for the man, I'm against the death penalty. As others have stated here, he should serve life and life meaning life. It won't be easy for him in prison once the other inmates know what he has been convicted for.

Agree with this and also the small chance of getting it wrong and killing the wrong person.

No sympathy for the c**t. Doing the above would effectively be a death sentence anyway so good enough. He would die either way which is what he deserves.

If it were my child I would want him dead...

Most people would feel the same, I know I would if it was my child. However that is an emotive response and they are dangerous when looking for justice. Justice will soon become revenge and then where do we go to as a so-called civilised society?

Better he is thrown in prison for life, to life with what he has done. He should also be stripped of whatever 'luxuries' other prisoners are afforded too.

I find myself in a big dilemma over this.  If it was my child, I would want the individual responsible tortured within an inch of his/her life and I also imagine I wouldn't have a big problem with them being killed, by the state or otherwise - at the same time, I know that this is wrong and we should forgive... none of us have the right to make life/death decisions, the state shouldn't have the right to either

[JUst retired]

Sorry to read it`s happening to-day. I would love to have gone and watched it.
Will it be on you tube?   Good enough for the fecker.

[southdown]

Absolutely.
And to think the Hypocrites  Bush/Blair invaded Afghanistan to stop this kind of thing 

Good pont.  Bush/Blair invaded Afghanistan follwoing 9/11, yet a high number of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi, the country with one of the world's worst human rights records.

Yet they remain close allies with one another.  Needless to say that Saudi Arabia is a rich oil-producing nation who contribute well to the US economy.  The whole thing stinks of hypocrasy.

[mylestheslasher]

Personally I am against the death penalty but for one reason only, that the wrong person would be found guilty, framed etc.

But if I were God and I just knew that this guy was guilty I'd have no problem crucifying him 1st and then beheading him.

In the absence of being all knowing I would suggest a life a hard labour for anyone doing this.

It is also worth noting this. Derry O Rourke who was found guilty of abusing 10's of young kids under his control as head swim coach in Ireland and was sentanced to over 100 years and served less than 9 I believe. He is now living in Cavan somewhere. Before we worry about death penalty issues, why not get the basics right and make sure scum like this never see the light of day again.

[ardal]

Can't believe the majority on this thread are for this punishment. Mistakes are made (Birmingham 6, Guildford 4 etc). I would imagine that a better punishement would be life (living) but in an environment he headed.

Take for example a wife beater. Make him work for the rest of his life in his worst nighmare. He has to live in a womens refuge until he dies. All the ladies there have a buzzer which is attached directly to a collar on his neck which releases an electrical shock each time it's pushed. He doesn't sweep well enough, buzz; electrical shock, brings the tea too slowly; buzz, electrical shock.

[Rav67]

Very easy for everyone to come on here and say a worse punishment than the one before to look righteous. And if the victim was anyone I knew, no punishment could be too severe.

But does anyone think that paedophiles are normal? On here there was a debate about homosexuality a while ago, and the consensus was that people are born with certain sexual preferences, and these cant be changed, no matter what Iris says. So presumably paedophiles are also born this way. And this being the case, should they all be crucified? Or shock horror, should treatment be sought for them - before they commit crimes like this?

Just a thought...

It's not the thought that's a crime - it's acting on it.  So they deserve to be very harshly punished for acting on their perverted thoughts.

A US state has trialled castration, both physical and chemical, in recent years, but it was on a voluntary basis.  The castrated paedophiles became asexual after it, had no sexual desires of any sort.  I would be in favour of this on an involuntary basis for any convicted serious sex offender along with a stiff prison sentence.

[Aerlik]

As disgusting as the crime is, beheadings and crucifixions have no place in a civilised society. It's barbaric, medieval behaviour.

Saudi Arabia is not a 'civilised' society.  It is a fcukin corrupt hellhole for anyone but the powerful elite.

The beheading is the punishment.

The crucifixion is the warning to others.

[mountainboii]

As disgusting as the crime is, beheadings and crucifixions have no place in a civilised society. It's barbaric, medieval behaviour.

Saudi Arabia is not a 'civilised' society.  It is a fcukin corrupt hellhole for anyone but the powerful elite.

The beheading is the punishment.

The crucifixion is the warning to others.

That was my point. It's disappointing that there are some on this thread that agree with this type of behaviour.