Nicholson Supports Clinton.... not Obama.

Started by ziggysego, March 04, 2008, 07:48:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ziggysego

Here is an Official Clinton YouTube video of Nicholson supporting the Clinton Campaign

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=tsweXFpfa28

Here is someone who supports Obama......   :D

http://ie.youtube.com/watch?v=l3VEMazRvNY
Testing Accessibility

Chrisowc

it's 'circle the wagons time again' here comes the cavalry!

thejuice

Brilliant, by the way what was that "changing the laws so she can cheat" in reference to?
It won't be the next manager but the one after that Meath will become competitive again - MO'D 2016

Lar Naparka

QuoteBrilliant, by the way what was that "changing the laws so she can cheat" in reference to?
I imagine that the reference is to a decision by the Democratic Party to withhold voting rights from the delegates selected at the Florida convention and those of another state .(I just can't recall the name right now.) 
I really don't know why this was so or why Florida and the other state decided to break ranks and hold their conventions as early as January, as the party administration has stated that all conventions should be held no earlier than February.
Anyway, neither Obama nor Clinton bothered campaigning in either as both states were warned in advance that the delegates selected would not be granted voting rights at the final convention to select the presidential candidate.
Anyway both state organisations went ahead and held their conventions and Clinton won both fairly comfortably but the result was meaningless.
Now, Clinton's organisation is trying to get the party decree overturned and to have the barred delegates given full voting rights.
Obama's supporters are none to happy at this move and the Party top brass seem to be dragging their feet on the issue.
Nil Carborundum Illegitemi

stew

#4
Quote from: Lar Naparka on March 04, 2008, 09:51:50 PM
QuoteBrilliant, by the way what was that "changing the laws so she can cheat" in reference to?
I imagine that the reference is to a decision by the Democratic Party to withhold voting rights from the delegates selected at the Florida convention and those of another state .(I just can't recall the name right now.) 
I really don't know why this was so or why Florida and the other state decided to break ranks and hold their conventions as early as January, as the party administration has stated that all conventions should be held no earlier than February.
Anyway, neither Obama nor Clinton bothered campaigning in either as both states were warned in advance that the delegates selected would not be granted voting rights at the final convention to select the presidential candidate.
Anyway both state organisations went ahead and held their conventions and Clinton won both fairly comfortably but the result was meaningless.
Now, Clinton's organisation is trying to get the party decree overturned and to have the barred delegates given full voting rights.
Obama's supporters are none to happy at this move and the Party top brass seem to be dragging their feet on the issue.


Thye were all told up front but the states creamed themselves to get the national attention honed in on them and they didnt think the party would follow through, they did, and  that bitch is trying to overturn the decision because she desperately needs the opportunity to get back in the race.
I cannot abide Hilary, go Obama.  :'(

The white house will belong to the dems, we are all fecked.
Armagh, the one true love of a mans life.

Rav67

Quote from: stew on March 09, 2008, 01:13:09 AM

The white house will belong to the dems, we are all fecked.

Surely couldn't be any worse than the incumbent.

Puckoon

Quote from: Rav67 on March 09, 2008, 01:57:58 AM
Quote from: stew on March 09, 2008, 01:13:09 AM

The white house will belong to the dems, we are all fecked.

Surely couldn't be any worse than the incumbent.

Understatement of 2008.