Conleith Gilligan (Derry) played for Moyola Park.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Gabriel_Hurl on November 22, 2006, 01:30:05 PM
4.22 To play the ball again after taking a free kick / penalty / sideline kick before another player has touched it, unless the ball rebounds off the goal-posts/crossbar.
PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE FOULS - (i) Cancel free kick or side-line kick. (ii) Throw in the ball where the foul occurred except as provided under Exception (v) of Rule 2.2.
Quote from: MacDanger on November 21, 2006, 11:30:31 PM
As regards the double bounce question, I don't think the drop kick is a foul; a few years ago Liam MacHale did a couple of "basketball bounces" trying to get the ball under control i.e. not taking the ball into his hands while bouncing, and it was later discussed by the RTE "experts" as being legal.
Also, if you bounce the ball and are then tackled and drop the ball, this would be a free under that interpretation.
Quote from: behind the wire on November 21, 2006, 02:56:58 PM
oakleaf, are u saying that if a player bounces the ball then drop kicks it thats a foul? thats what it appears you are saying.
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on November 21, 2006, 01:24:15 PM
I don't think it is a double bounce as he did not touch the ball with his hands after the second bounce.
Quote from: Cloc Mor on November 19, 2006, 08:51:49 PM
So,you are telling me that a player can receive the ball inside the 14yard line as long as he was 14 yards away when the ball was kicked.
Quote from: Cloc Mor on November 19, 2006, 04:55:58 PM
So the ball can be played 13m to the wing and still be inside the 21 and its ok?
Quote from: Cloc Mor on November 19, 2006, 08:28:43 PM
I take it from the gist of your response that you are are referee. If the players you referee are as confused as me about your interpretation of the rules, God help you.
Quote from: Mac Eoghain on November 18, 2006, 01:55:42 PMQuote
1) Forward hits marker off the ball.
2) referee awards free kick to attacking team still unaware of incident. Umpire raises flag and walks 2 yards onto field. Opposition stops.
3) Unmarked Forward runs for quick free kick slots the goal past umpire and Goalkeeper (umpire still on field of play)
4) Referee consults with umpire sends goalscorer off, then allows goal and 14 man team wins by 3 points.
Were the rules correctly applied here or what should have happened differently, to protect a team that dosent strike?
Many rules in play here, I'm not going to bore you with the details, but:
(1) The umpire should not have entered the field of play. He must move along the line and signal with his hand up for the referee's attention.
(2) As the referee was unaware of the incident he should not stop play until there is a break in play, in this case it was when the score was taken. The fact that the defenders stopped defending is irrelevant, we are taught from a young age to play until the whistle.
(3) Sending the goalscorer off, no problem there.
(4) He should allow the goal as play had not been stopped.
Quote from: Mac Eoghain on November 18, 2006, 01:22:14 PM
However, the offence to which Oakleaf refers falls under the Dissent Rules, which state:
Rule 6.2
To show dissent with the referee's decision to award a free kick to the opposing team.
<b>PENALTY - The free kick already awarded shall be taken 13m more advantageous than the place of original kick - up to opponents' 13m line.</b>
THEREFORE, in the case of Dissent the ball CANNOT be moved 13m.
Quote from: oneillcup2007 on November 18, 2006, 10:37:55 AM
Official Line you are very welcome. Lets see how you would deal with this interpretation?
1) Forward hits marker off the ball.
2) referee awards free kick to attacking team still unaware of incident. Umpire raises flag and walks 2 yards onto field. Opposition stops.
3) Unmarked Forward runs for quick free kick slots the goal past umpire and Goalkeeper (umpire still on field of play)
4) Referee consults with umpire sends goalscorer off, then allows goal and 14 man team wins by 3 points.
Were the rules correctly applied here or what should have happened differently, to protect a team that dosent strike?
Quote from: Guillem2 on November 18, 2006, 07:57:50 AM
What is the rule in football on playing the ball on the ground. I was told that its ok for a player laying on thr ground to palm it away from himself but I've also seen it blown for a free. This is something even the refs aren't sure about.
Quote from: Offical Line on November 17, 2006, 07:15:55 PM
Gabriel Hurl,
Your position on the Advantage Rule is incorrect, if you read the rules properly you will see what i mean, i am not acting the smart arse, there is no rule titled Advantage rule, however in the Rules of Football and hurling, 4.36 in football rule will clarify it for you. Your answer with the awarding a 10 yrds further up the line is also incorrect for dissent, the player can be cautioned, you cannot move the ball a further 10yrds up the line.
I would suggest that you read the book in more detail Gabriel, even 1.2?
Quote from: johnneycool on November 16, 2006, 11:28:05 AM
The Newtownards Chronical has a full colour suppliment on the hurling and football every thursday. The Camogie gets a great write up in the Newtownards Spectator as well.