Messages

Lads yis are very touchy about this Liverpool avatar. Do you think that lads on a soccer board would take as much offence to somebody posting with their county crest as an avatar? I'd say they wouldn't give a monkeys.

Most normal people wouldn't give a monkeys one way or the other

well you have so much anti dublin things to say especial about their players and generally their supporter i and just suprised you would support a team who seem to roit their way thru Europe. I think they were even called the worse supports by uefa but that had to be retract because the englinh FA went crazy.

Just suprised you would be that type since you are so self righteous when it comes to the dubs. Some would even call it double standards

When since Heysel have Liverpool fans 'roited' through Europe?

You say that like Heysel was a minor incident

I don't see how it came across that I say it was a minor incident, it was far from minor.  Apologies if the way I phrased it was dismissing it as minor.

Lads yis are very touchy about this Liverpool avatar. Do you think that lads on a soccer board would take as much offence to somebody posting with their county crest as an avatar? I'd say they wouldn't give a monkeys.

Most normal people wouldn't give a monkeys one way or the other

well you have so much anti dublin things to say especial about their players and generally their supporter i and just suprised you would support a team who seem to roit their way thru Europe. I think they were even called the worse supports by uefa but that had to be retract because the englinh FA went crazy.

Just suprised you would be that type since you are so self righteous when it comes to the dubs. Some would even call it double standards

When since Heysel have Liverpool fans 'roited' through Europe?

[Its a bit of a myth that it has been boycotted]

I lived in Liverpool for a few years and it was hard to get the Sun because it seemed to be the most widely read paper in the city. In my experience Its a bit of a myth that it has been boycotted.

WUM plain and simple, a myth indeed!

As regards the apology, the 'apology' consisted of the S*n having a go at Liverpudlians for being up in arms at Rooney giving them an interview.   Rather than redressing the damage they did by apologizing on the front page, like their initial slur, the 'apology' took place in the editorial with their front page devoted to how the reaction in Liverpool had been a hate campaign towards Rooney. 

The editorial basically had an 'apology' of sorts totally undermined by twisting the thing to have a go at those so incensed at Rooney (the fact Rooney gave the interview in the first place in indefensible anyway)  The editorial brought up World Wars and a whole other load of horses**t, whatever relevance that had to saying sorry.  The last line of the 'apology' reads: 'It's time to move on'.  Who are they to tell victims when they should 'move on'.

I have little interest in going to the trouble of having a cyber-arguement with anyone.  However, personally I don't expect anyone who follows Liverpool to have anything to do with the rag, and I feel that fans of other clubs perhaps should appreciate that playing down the issues regarding the S*n annoys those who may perhaps have followed developments in more detail. 

[the sun]

starting team for tomorrow?couldnt see rafa playing the same team in consectuive games this season too often especially when you look at the quality we have in central midfield and there wouldnt be alot to choose between the strikers.see the sun reported crouch was looking showdown talks after the game sat.think he could be a good man for holding the ball up tomorrow away from home.rafa will also take into account that we play chelski at the weekend.

No 1:  From your posts you seem to have a fair knowledge of Liverpool.  In that case why oh why do you read or make reference to that rag, or have the issues re the S*n somehow bypassed you in this internet age??
No 2:  Since when did tabloids become accurate reporters of sports news?  Is there a direct quote from Crouch saying he wants 'showdown talks'?  Or is it the usual 'sources close to the striker say...' rubbish?  Not that any attention should be paid to anything written in the rag anyway