You know what really grinds my gears?

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

[ziggysego]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

They could break their necks, if they were cycling on the roads. Best to use the cycle lanes on the footpaths.

[full back]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

They could break their necks, if they were cycling on the roads. Best to use the cycle lanes on the footpaths.

Why is it best that they use footpaths ? A cyclist has every right to be on the road, and chances are they are more responsible road users than the twats that think they shouldnt be there.

[ziggysego]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

They could break their necks, if they were cycling on the roads. Best to use the cycle lanes on the footpaths.

Why is it best that they use footpaths ? A cyclist has every right to be on the road, and chances are they are more responsible road users than the t**ts that think they shouldnt be there.

But the cyclist don't belong on the road.

[full back]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

Yeah,
If I dont agree with you or dont think that cyclists should be 'given' a break, I therefore do not have a brain
If there is a cyclist path, the cyclists should be on it.....................not on the road

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

They could break their necks, if they were cycling on the roads. Best to use the cycle lanes on the footpaths.

Why is it best that they use footpaths ? A cyclist has every right to be on the road, and chances are they are more responsible road users than the t**ts that think they shouldnt be there.

But the cyclist don't belong on the road.

yes they do

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

Yeah,
If I dont agree with you or dont think that cyclists should be 'given' a break, I therefore do not have a brain
If there is a cyclist path, the cyclists should be on it.....................no on the road

have you ever ridden a bike on a cycle path ?

[full back]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

Yeah,
If I dont agree with you or dont think that cyclists should be 'given' a break, I therefore do not have a brain
If there is a cyclist path, the cyclists should be on it.....................no on the road

have you ever ridden a bike on a cycle path ?

Yeah

[ziggysego]

I did a bit of research there man in black and indeed you are correct.

Section 72 of the Highway Act 1835, amended by Section 85(1) of the Local Government Act 1888 states you could fined £30 if caught cycling on the footpath.

However, it is against the law to cycle in a busy intersection.

Many apologises man in black.  

[man in black]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

Yeah,
If I dont agree with you or dont think that cyclists should be 'given' a break, I therefore do not have a brain
If there is a cyclist path, the cyclists should be on it.....................no on the road

have you ever ridden a bike on a cycle path ?

Yeah

And was this path continious where a cyclist wouldnt have to dismount or slow down for  say 3 or 4 miles ? Na didnt think so.

What is so urgent in your life that you cannot slow down for a few seconds to get past a cyclist. What are your objections to cyclists on the road exactly ? And for jesus sake dont say road tax as that puts you straight in idiot category

[man in black]

I did a bit of research there man in black and indeed you are correct.

Section 72 of the Highway Act 1835, amended by Section 85(1) of the Local Government Act 1888 states you could fined £30 if caught cycling on the footpath.

However, it is against the law to cycle in a busy intersection.

Many apologises man in black.  

Define busy intersection - me thinks you are talking poo poo ziggy

[jimbo]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

They could break their necks, if they were cycling on the roads. Best to use the cycle lanes on the footpaths.

Why is it best that they use footpaths ? A cyclist has every right to be on the road, and chances are they are more responsible road users than the t**ts that think they shouldnt be there.

Does that include the pricks who cycle beside each other?

[full back]

Na, am too old for nightclubs

And therefore should be old enough to know that cyclists deserve a break as well.

Who are you tell tell me what I should & shouldnt know?
Poor cyclists  

Well i made the assumption you had a brain. Sorry

Yeah,
If I dont agree with you or dont think that cyclists should be 'given' a break, I therefore do not have a brain
If there is a cyclist path, the cyclists should be on it.....................no on the road

have you ever ridden a bike on a cycle path ?

Yeah

And was this path continious where a cyclist wouldnt have to dismount or slow down for  say 3 or 4 miles ? Na didnt think so.

What is so urgent in your life that you cannot slow down for a few seconds to get past a cyclist. What are your objections to cyclists on the road exactly ? And for jesus sake dont say road tax as that puts you straight in idiot category

What is so urgent in your life that you cant walk somewhere instead of cycling?