Armagh management :Paddy O'Rourke!!!

Started by armaghniac, July 21, 2009, 05:35:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

waitingforsam

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

And their names are?
Been waiting since '94

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

irunthev

Quote from: yellowcard on July 26, 2009, 10:19:24 PM
Quote from: orangeman on July 26, 2009, 10:14:23 PM
Quote from: yellowcard on July 26, 2009, 10:12:47 PM
Article in the Tribune today referred to an unused sub being the player who leaked the team and tactics. Not sure who this is referring to.

More finger poimting at the invisibles.

Not sure what your getting at?

Was actually a well written article that was well informed and hit the nail on the head.

Would there be any chance of getting hold of this article? Live in Belgium so the Tribune isn't that readily available.

armaghniac

If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B


man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?


Orior

Should two players in question be called saboteurs or saviours?
Cover me in chocolate and feed me to the lesbians

Orior

Quote from: Diet Coke on July 26, 2009, 10:29:00 PM
Look lads as Armagh supporters do you think:

1. Peter Mc Donnell was the best man for the job?

2. That was the best team we could have fielded?

I like Peter as an individual and played along side him, but I feel he never had a free reign, and I definately feel there are good players not on the squad as it stands.


1) Yes
2) Yes
Cover me in chocolate and feed me to the lesbians

Apple Crumble

I jut heard that the Armagh board have spoken to Greg Blaney & James McCarten about the position.

Whats your thoughts on that?

man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

man in black

Quote from: Apple Crumble on July 27, 2009, 03:01:55 PM
I jut heard that the Armagh board have spoken to Greg Blaney & James McCarten about the position.

Whats your thoughts on that?

The last thing Armagh will want is 2 down men steering them towards oblivion. ;D
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?