Official Gooners Thread - A New Hope

[J70]

[/quote]

Think the charges happened after the contract renewal broke down cause fear of him going to a country he couldn't be extradited from. Arsenal couldn't terminate his contract because of consequences for City with Mendy but he should have being removed from team.

What are the parallels with Everton and Siggurdson (sp?). He ended up not being charged at all, but Everton suspended him after the arrest. I know it was child-related suspicions in his case.

[Baile Brigín 2]

If he was a Man Utd player there would have been huge public outcry, protests at matches, threats of sponsor boycotts.
Amazing how Arsenal were able to play him as if nothing had happened.

The problem is, legally at least, nothing had happened.

[GTP]

Sigurdsson was arrested then suspended. Partey is one of my children's favourite players so can't say I was comfortable knowing the allegations and him playing, but he wasn't charged and he isn't guilty until a trial so on balance Arsenal have acted properly.

[Dag Dog]

If he was a Man Utd player there would have been huge public outcry, protests at matches, threats of sponsor boycotts.
Amazing how Arsenal were able to play him as if nothing had happened.

The problem is, legally at least, nothing had happened.

Same with Greenwood. Different reaction to it though.

[SaffronSports]

TBH I think Arsenal can't necessarily be blamed for playing him. There has been talk about this for a while now and obviously in the GAA there are a few cases going on and quite a lot of different outcomes (some still involved/some not). Ultimately, I think there needs to be a level of consistency across the board. Is that innocent until proven guilty? Difficult to get it right but there are cases where someone maybe has false allegations made against them. Should they lose months or years of their career because of that?

[Baile Brigín 2]

If he was a Man Utd player there would have been huge public outcry, protests at matches, threats of sponsor boycotts.
Amazing how Arsenal were able to play him as if nothing had happened.

The problem is, legally at least, nothing had happened.

Same with Greenwood. Different reaction to it though.

Greenwood did what he did. We all saw the video. United made their call based on that, not the legals around it.

[gawa316]

Is that Chelsea fella Madueke going to Arsenal as well?

Eze, Madueke, Gyokeres and Rodrygo are being worked on at the moment.. The first 3 more than likely will be signed, Rodrygo a lot of work needing done to get it finalised

They'll hardly buy all of them would they, especially as 2 of them preferred position is where Saka plays?

Do they have the guts of £300+ to spend?

[Mourne Red]

Is that Chelsea fella Madueke going to Arsenal as well?

Eze, Madueke, Gyokeres and Rodrygo are being worked on at the moment.. The first 3 more than likely will be signed, Rodrygo a lot of work needing done to get it finalised

They'll hardly buy all of them would they, especially as 2 of them preferred position is where Saka plays?

Do they have the guts of £300+ to spend?

Was reported earlier in the year club had a 300m possible layout if needed in the summer. That would mean no transfers next summer mind but possible they do get them all.

Would prefer if we got Eze, Rodrygo (Would be left wing) and Gyokeres no need to sign Madueke. But Trossard has a bid from Turkey and Vieira is being sold so money made back on them.

We have Nwaneri who's minutes will be impacted if Madueke comes so I don't see the need for signing him