Down Club Hurling & Football

Started by Lecale2, November 10, 2006, 12:06:55 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

outinfront

Doing away with 4 would result in more competitive matches throughout the season.  This can only be a good thing. 

dundrumite

Quote from: outinfront on November 09, 2011, 06:17:58 PM
Doing away with 4 would result in more competitive matches throughout the season.  This can only be a good thing.

It would just mean greater margins between those at top and bottom in each division. Can't see it going through

45

How do you sort who your teams are for the junior championship with that divisional structure.

DownFanatic

Quote from: outinfront on November 09, 2011, 06:17:58 PM
Doing away with 4 would result in more competitive matches throughout the season.  This can only be a good thing.

It will infact do the opposite. The proposed re-structuring only serves to provide the opportunity for current Division 4 teams to take the brunt of heavier and more sustained hammerings.

This proposal is a nonsense and Id hope that all clubs see sense and vote against it.

Out in Front

Quote from: DownFanatic on November 09, 2011, 05:18:25 PM
County's Latest Proposals to be voted on at the next County Board meeting.


When is the next County Board meeting when this will be up for discussion?

DownFanatic

Quote from: Out in Front on November 09, 2011, 07:34:27 PM
Quote from: DownFanatic on November 09, 2011, 05:18:25 PM
County's Latest Proposals to be voted on at the next County Board meeting.


When is the next County Board meeting when this will be up for discussion?

Vote being taken on it on the 24th of November.

Brick Tamlin

Quote from: DownFanatic on November 09, 2011, 07:12:14 PM
Quote from: outinfront on November 09, 2011, 06:17:58 PM
Doing away with 4 would result in more competitive matches throughout the season.  This can only be a good thing.

It will infact do the opposite. The proposed re-structuring only serves to provide the opportunity for current Division 4 teams to take the brunt of heavier and more sustained hammerings.

This proposal is a nonsense and Id hope that all clubs see sense and vote against it.

Dont count on it.
This is the same crowd who thought it appropriate to approve the new County Clubs Draw after all.
Really wonder what some of club reps are thhinkin half the time they go to these county board meetings.

ardtole

3b in particular looks particulary lob-sided, the bottom 7 teams would get murdered by by the top 4 or 5. When there is no relegation, teams have nothing to play for, this will lead to players losing interest, teams not fielding etc. I think since the leagues restructured, no club can feel agrieved at what league they are in. The leagues all seem to be quite competitive, yet there are distinct differences in quality between 1&2, 2&3 and 3&4, and this is the way it should be.

Teams that come up from div 4 generally struggle in div 3, and the same goes for newly promoted teams in other divisions. I dont think there is much wrong with our structures, they are very good actually. I think at this time of year we get proposals just for proposals sake, I dont expect to see this new system in action.

thewobbler

Daft proposal for the SFC. For the next few years there's only 3-4 clubs in Down have any chance of winning a SFC, and all this does is take three times as long to reach that conclusion. I hope it's not only defeated, but all proposals like this could somehow be banned for 5 years. Whichever club dreamt it up needs a good shoeing.

The league proposal does make sense to me. Yep there's going to be a few slappings handed out, but the greatest challenge to the likes of the Fin is getting commitment from players. Shorter trips, more derbies, and a better standard can only have a positive effect on them in the medium term.

Minus15

Current structures aren't a problem - it is the scheduling of the fixtures that is the problem. That proposal could only make things worse! 2 championsip games that you lose then a further 3 games to survive in the senior championship. Throw in league relegation playoffs and prelimiary rounds for amalgamations and a decent All Ireland run for the county and there will be madness. The rescheduling of a few years ago has only just had its first year as a settled system. Give it time to settle down before messing with it again.

Majority of Div 3 clubs will vote against the 3a and 3b proposal I would think. I don't see how it gives clubs a better chance of reaching Div 2. still 2 teams go up and some teams are never going to challenge to go up no matter how much restructuring takes place.

maldini

#18835
Quote from: DownFanatic on November 09, 2011, 05:18:25 PM
County's Latest Proposals to be voted on at the next County Board meeting.



Proposal for re-structuring of Division 3 and the doing away of Division 4

3A                       3B
Ballymartin          Drumgath
Tullylish           Kilclief
Carryduff           Darragh Cross
St John Bosco    Glasdrumman
Glenn            Atticall
Ardglass          St John's
Dundrum           Mitchel's
Saul            Drumaness
Bredagh            Dromara
St Paul's               Bright
Teconnaught       St Michaels
Aghaderg             Aughlisnafin
Ballykinlar   
   

In 2012 there would be no Division 4 but rather a Division 3a and 3B this would be an honest attempt to assist those smaller Clubs with more regional based fixtures which would have hopefully the two fold purpose of cutting down travel costs but in turn maximising home gates.

thats a farce of a proposal

Carryduff and Bredagh would be travelling to Bosco and Ballymartin, Darragh would be travelling to Drumgath, Mitchels and Atticall - if regionalising is their aim they could have made a better proposal than that.

Division 4 is there for a reason, half the games each week would be cricket scores in those two leagues


PAULD123

I appluad teh county board for considering radical prposals to improve the condition of teams in the lower divisions. I think we should support them in their desire. I do however agree that this proposal is not the best solution. In fact probably simply a split division 4 would be better, giving a divsion 4A & 4B with each team playing each other 4 timeds instead of two. The split mini-leagues could allow sensible regionalisation and would allow a play off for promotion.

As for the senior championship proposal it si a bit like the Dublin championship method which I think is a much better one than our current straight knock-out. My own club play one game each year in the championship and then that is it over. We are not good enough to compete in the Senior but just sneak in each year. So anything that allows players at least a few games is a good proposal.

Does anyone object to the proposal to change the championship?

outinfront

Down Fanatic I see your point.  I think having just played a season in 4 and unfortunately missing out on promotion, means the prospect of another year in 4 is depressing me!

kumquat

#18838



Proposal for re-structuring of Division 3 and the doing away of Division 4

3A                       3B
Ballymartin          Drumgath
Tullylish           Kilclief
Carryduff           Darragh Cross
St John Bosco    Glasdrumman
Glenn            Atticall
Ardglass          St John's
Dundrum           Mitchel's
Saul            Drumaness
Bredagh            Dromara
St Paul's               Bright
Teconnaught       St Michaels
Aghaderg             Aughlisnafin
Ballykinlar   
   

In 2012 there would be no Division 4 but rather a Division 3a and 3B this would be an honest attempt to assist those smaller Clubs with more regional based fixtures which would have hopefully the two fold purpose of cutting down travel costs but in turn maximising home gates. [/quote]

how would Aghaderg & Ballykinler benefit by playing Ballymartin & Tullylish? and St Michaels & Aughlisnafin by playing Kilclief & Drumgath?

A split Div 4 as PAULD123 says would be a better proposal, but i would leave the championship alone, straight knock out is what makes it so good.
Buy us a pint then Boselecta!!!

PAULD123

Quote from: kumquat on November 10, 2011, 10:50:08 AM
....
A split Div 4 as PAULD123 says would be a better proposal, but i would leave the championship alone, straight knock out is what makes it so good.

Who does it make it good for? It makes it good for 3-4 clubs who can win it. But what about the clubs that are the bottom of the pile? Good enough to win or at least challenge for an IFC but no where near good enough for SFC. The championship is a total waste of time for many clubs. These clubs are being made play at a level above themselves.

Why not have everyone play in a single preliminary round (seeded of course) with winners playing in SFC. Losers all go to IFC where there is a second preliminary round with those losers going to JFC. After that championship runs as we currently know it with straight knock-out. This would allow a team to find a level where they would have the chance to win soem kind of championship.

I accept the number of rounds/games/seeding system would need to be considered carefully. But I put this out as simply a proposal in principle. I just want everyone to have a chance of winning something.