Quote from: btdtgtt on September 04, 2014, 07:05:51 PMQuote from: Glensman on September 04, 2014, 06:28:52 PMQuote from: btdtgtt on September 04, 2014, 10:57:05 AMQuote from: Bonamargy on September 04, 2014, 10:08:21 AMQuote from: btdtgtt on September 04, 2014, 09:44:25 AM
I'm finding it difficult to believe that an referee turned a 21yard free into a penalty?
Casement saga in court next week it appears.
Cloughmills player ran in and tackled McKernan when he was striking the free from 25 yards. Jackie booked the Cloughmills player and awarded a penalty. Sarsfields scored their goal from the rebound.
So is this adjudged to be a separate infringement and hence the penalty award?
But surely even this wasnt within the square?
I would have though book the guy and move to a more advantageous position?
Did Cloughmills not go crazy at the time! Seems a strange one to me!
Going crazy on the sideline is a different thing from in the heat of battle just getting on with it as players - would Jackie has changes his mind? Probably not and issued a yellow card. It was not inside the box (either infraction) and it appears should not have become a penalty in any event - should have been moves forward to the more advantageous position as noted. Bit of a disgrace.
Have a lot of sympathy for refs but getting these basic things wrong cost CMills dearly...not necessarily the reason they lost but was a huge turning point.
Can referees not get together and agree positions on things where they come up in games. I was stood not too far away from another well respected referee in the county who called these two things and a couple more differently. A high pressure position alright but the least players deserve is consitency and rules applied.
Yes I understand a referee making a debateable call in an ambiguous scenario - we're all human an all that.
But this just seems such a blatant error in a basic rule!
Hard to get the head round for anyone let alone a cloughmills man!
Think we're on the same wavelength here!