Quote from: sid waddell on December 29, 2020, 06:02:13 PMQuote from: 6th sam on December 29, 2020, 05:30:57 PMIt's hard not to have disdain for people who shower you with furious disdain merely for pointing out that the PIRA campaign was an abomination, or for pointing out that Margaret Tebbit, the wife of a Tory politician, was horrifically disabled by a bomb planted by PIRA murderersQuote from: Angelo on December 29, 2020, 04:57:36 PMQuote from: sid waddell on December 29, 2020, 04:22:08 PM
But it's not a lie
Southerners are continually told by a particular breed of northern nationalist, summed up you, that they should have no view on the north
But these same northern nationalists are total hypocrites because they generally have firm views on southern politics
Also if northern nationalists tell southerners they have no right to have a view on anything on the north, which they do, don't then turn around and tell us we "abandoned" you
After all, you're the same people telling us we've no right to have a view - and if that's the case, well then "abandonment" by the south is exactly what you wanted
More hypocrisy
You shouldn't have a view on the north because you haven't a clue about it, not one single iota. All you spout is complete and utter ignorance and bile about something you don't understand or have no practical experience of.
The only hypocrisy being shown here is from you. You're the type of person who would be dangerous if they had any intelligence.
I disagree with a lot of Sid's views, but he also
Makes very fair points , which tend to get undermined by his approach and apparent disdain for what he insultingly terms " a certain breed of northern nationalists" . He argues articulately but his apparent lack of understanding , empathy and rapport indicates a lack of the social intelligence required to be persuasive . Tbf he is very consistent/persistent but I would agree that his/her views need to be put into the context of lack
Of meaningful personal experience of "The North" . He deserves enormous credit however in uniting "northern nationalists" whether SF, SDLP or whoever else in opposition to his approach. I understand His opposition to the exclusive and unhealthy adherence to place manifested in nationalism , but this is in direct contrast to his unwavering Adherence to Dublin as an permanent entity in GAA terms. I would agree that his defence of Dublin's ridiculously unfair advantages is like those unionists who begrudgingly resist any movement towards equality , as if they are concessions . Understandable resistance to the nuclear option of splitting Dublin( or in unionists' case United Ireland) is accompanied by an unneighbourly lack
Of generosity towards agreeing to equality and fairness in the meantime.
That's the sort of healthy disdain everybody should have
Not having such leaves one open to supporting more abominations in the future
Very strange comparison of my support for Dublin GAA with blood and soil nationalism
As it happens I am open to the notion of a split in Dublin as long as it is accompanied by amalgamations of other counties
Just out of interest do you condemn loyalist and British army atrocities with the same vigour?