Quote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AMAnd he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation
Quote from: snoopdog on Today at 03:17:54 PMArmagh ladies played i think Cavan last year before the Derry gameQuote from: pbat on Today at 10:56:12 AMArmagh/Donegal play next Sunday in the Ladies Ulster final, would it have been that hard to agree a financial arrangement with the Ladies to get a few quid from tomorrows gate and have a double header?That would be too much like common sense for the GAA to do.
Quote from: pbat on Today at 10:56:12 AMArmagh/Donegal play next Sunday in the Ladies Ulster final, would it have been that hard to agree a financial arrangement with the Ladies to get a few quid from tomorrows gate and have a double header?That would be too much like common sense for the GAA to do.
Quote from: whitey on Today at 02:43:30 PMQuote from: Itchy on Today at 02:31:36 PMQuote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AMQuote from: Itchy on Today at 09:44:26 AMQuote from: whitey on Today at 12:27:16 AMIt's not really that complicated
Enforce existing laws
Deport people whose claims are denied
Rigorous background checks on new arrivals
Set Welfare benefits in line with European averages (not double)
Can you explain to me how you do "rigorous background checks" on someone fleeing a warzone. Do you send a form to their local police station?
Also, do you think their should be rigourous checks on all sides. Would there be anything to be said for some checks on these far right goons? I mean if they were involved in local sports, foroige, community games etc then they'd already have been Garda vetted, but we know none of them do anything in their community. I'm all for rigorous checks on them so we can see who has criminal records, beats their wife and sells drugs etc. I'm sure you'd agree you wouldn't want those type of people heading up your racist protests
Great
So we're in agreement then. More rigorous checks on incoming applicants are a good thing.
So we don't end up with a shambolic situation like the one highlighted last week where a guy (convicted sex offender) denied asylum in 3 separate countries can get in having destroyed a fake Swedish passport
And he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation
I asked you a question, you afraid to answer it
Your "question" makes absolutely no sense and is actually irrelevant as to whether rigorous background checks should be carried out on people seeking international protection (some of whom have no id)
So you're in agreement with me on these rigorous checks......thats fantastic!
If you want to start a separate thread about "legal Irish residents" who have criminal convictions, and what activities, they should and shouldnt be allowed to partake in go right ahead. There are laws already in place and I would think (and hope) they are being fully enforced. If theyre not....then they should be
Quote from: Itchy on Today at 02:31:36 PMQuote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AMQuote from: Itchy on Today at 09:44:26 AMQuote from: whitey on Today at 12:27:16 AMIt's not really that complicated
Enforce existing laws
Deport people whose claims are denied
Rigorous background checks on new arrivals
Set Welfare benefits in line with European averages (not double)
Can you explain to me how you do "rigorous background checks" on someone fleeing a warzone. Do you send a form to their local police station?
Also, do you think their should be rigourous checks on all sides. Would there be anything to be said for some checks on these far right goons? I mean if they were involved in local sports, foroige, community games etc then they'd already have been Garda vetted, but we know none of them do anything in their community. I'm all for rigorous checks on them so we can see who has criminal records, beats their wife and sells drugs etc. I'm sure you'd agree you wouldn't want those type of people heading up your racist protests
Great
So we're in agreement then. More rigorous checks on incoming applicants are a good thing.
So we don't end up with a shambolic situation like the one highlighted last week where a guy (convicted sex offender) denied asylum in 3 separate countries can get in having destroyed a fake Swedish passport
And he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation
I asked you a question, you afraid to answer it