Recent posts

#91
GAA Discussion / Re: All Ireland U20 football c...
Last post by Gael85 - Today at 03:53:29 PM
Meath shooting is poor. Kerry should see this through.
#92
General discussion / Re: The far right
Last post by gallsman - Today at 03:41:12 PM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AMAnd he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation




Not your taxes though.

Pretty common right wing trope there
#93
GAA Discussion / Re: Tailteann Cup 2024
Last post by Blowitupref - Today at 03:39:01 PM
Eye catching result this afternoon in O'Connor Park

Offaly 0-12 London 2-20

Londons first championship win in 11 years.
#94
GAA Discussion / Re: Ulster Senior football cha...
Last post by Armagh18 - Today at 03:37:25 PM
Quote from: snoopdog on Today at 03:17:54 PM
Quote from: pbat on Today at 10:56:12 AMArmagh/Donegal play next Sunday in the Ladies Ulster final, would it have been that hard to agree a financial arrangement with the Ladies to get a few quid from tomorrows gate and have a double header?
That would be too much like common sense for the GAA to do.
Armagh ladies played i think Cavan last year before the Derry game
#95
General discussion / Re: The far right
Last post by whitey - Today at 03:33:04 PM
I seriously don't know what your question is

Are you saying that people (legal Irish Residents) of low moral character (with criminal convictions) shouldn't be allowed (on principal) to lead protests or are you saying that people (legal Irish citizens) of low moral character (with criminal convictions) should be legally prohibited from leading protests?

In some jurisdictions  you can be prohibited by a court of law from associating with "known criminals" as part of a sentencing agreement. If that, or similar processes are in place in Ireland, then I would expect and demand that the Gardai fully enforce it
#96
GAA Discussion / Re: Ulster Senior football cha...
Last post by snoopdog - Today at 03:17:54 PM
Quote from: pbat on Today at 10:56:12 AMArmagh/Donegal play next Sunday in the Ladies Ulster final, would it have been that hard to agree a financial arrangement with the Ladies to get a few quid from tomorrows gate and have a double header?
That would be too much like common sense for the GAA to do.
#97
General discussion / Re: Ticket sellers....
Last post by general_lee - Today at 03:11:47 PM
This week a good week for the ticket sellers in Armagh, all the flegs out on the good GAA houses
#98
General discussion / Re: The far right
Last post by Itchy - Today at 03:03:08 PM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 02:43:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on Today at 02:31:36 PM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AM
Quote from: Itchy on Today at 09:44:26 AM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 12:27:16 AMIt's not really that complicated

Enforce existing laws

Deport people whose claims are denied

Rigorous background checks on new arrivals

Set Welfare benefits in line with European averages (not double)





Can you explain to me how you do "rigorous background checks" on someone fleeing a warzone. Do you send a form to their local police station?

Also, do you think their should be rigourous checks on all sides. Would there be anything to be said for some checks on these far right goons? I mean if they were involved in local sports, foroige, community games etc then they'd already have been Garda vetted, but we know none of them do anything in their community. I'm all for rigorous checks on them so we can see who has criminal records, beats their wife and sells drugs etc. I'm sure you'd agree you wouldn't want those type of people heading up your racist protests

Great

So we're in agreement then. More rigorous checks on incoming applicants are a good thing.

So we don't end up with a shambolic situation like the one highlighted last week where a guy (convicted sex offender) denied asylum in 3 separate countries can get in having destroyed a fake Swedish passport

And he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation




I asked you a question,  you afraid to answer it

Your "question" makes absolutely no sense and is actually irrelevant as to whether rigorous background checks should be carried out on people seeking international protection (some of whom have no id)

So you're in agreement with me on these rigorous checks......thats fantastic!

If you want to start a separate thread about "legal Irish residents" who have criminal convictions, and what activities, they should and shouldnt be allowed to partake in go right ahead. There are laws already in place and I would think (and hope) they are being fully enforced.  If theyre not....then they should be

As usual too much of a shite to answer a question. Away with ya
#99
General discussion / Re: The far right
Last post by whitey - Today at 02:43:30 PM
Quote from: Itchy on Today at 02:31:36 PM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 10:57:41 AM
Quote from: Itchy on Today at 09:44:26 AM
Quote from: whitey on Today at 12:27:16 AMIt's not really that complicated

Enforce existing laws

Deport people whose claims are denied

Rigorous background checks on new arrivals

Set Welfare benefits in line with European averages (not double)





Can you explain to me how you do "rigorous background checks" on someone fleeing a warzone. Do you send a form to their local police station?

Also, do you think their should be rigourous checks on all sides. Would there be anything to be said for some checks on these far right goons? I mean if they were involved in local sports, foroige, community games etc then they'd already have been Garda vetted, but we know none of them do anything in their community. I'm all for rigorous checks on them so we can see who has criminal records, beats their wife and sells drugs etc. I'm sure you'd agree you wouldn't want those type of people heading up your racist protests

Great

So we're in agreement then. More rigorous checks on incoming applicants are a good thing.

So we don't end up with a shambolic situation like the one highlighted last week where a guy (convicted sex offender) denied asylum in 3 separate countries can get in having destroyed a fake Swedish passport

And he then took a (taxpayer funded) legal action against the government to avoid deportation




I asked you a question,  you afraid to answer it

Your "question" makes absolutely no sense and is actually irrelevant as to whether rigorous background checks should be carried out on people seeking international protection (some of whom have no id)

So you're in agreement with me on these rigorous checks......thats fantastic!

If you want to start a separate thread about "legal Irish residents" who have criminal convictions, and what activities, they should and shouldnt be allowed to partake in go right ahead. There are laws already in place and I would think (and hope) they are being fully enforced.  If theyre not....then they should be
#100
General discussion / Re: The Offical Glasgow Celtic...
Last post by Main Street - Today at 02:32:34 PM
I think the dust has quickly settled with the fans in Celtic Park re that awful last 20mins, Rangers beaten and the title won