gaaboard.com

Non GAA Discussion => General discussion => Topic started by: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM

Title: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?

Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: oakleafgael on May 20, 2009, 04:08:53 PM
Quote from: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?



Donagh,

You will not get permission for a replacement dwelling on either of the first two.

You may get a replacement permission for the third. Expect anything from 6 months to 2 years depending on the council area. They also may restrict the size of your replacement depending on the existing and the surrounding area.
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: lfdown2 on May 20, 2009, 04:12:16 PM
my understanding is that for a replacement dwelling the existing dwelling has to be liveable, ie running water electricity etc, which as stated above seems to rule out the first two, also with the third the chances of getting much more than another 1 bedroom would be slim but im not an expert,

ps

any word on the pps21
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 04:12:56 PM
Quote from: oakleafgael on May 20, 2009, 04:08:53 PM

You will not get permission for a replacement dwelling on either of the first two.

You may get a replacement permission for the third. Expect anything from 6 months to 2 years depending on the council area. They also may restrict the size of your replacement depending on the existing and the surrounding area.

Thanks oakleafgael. Do you think I'd be able to renovate and extend the first?
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 04:15:22 PM
Quote from: lfdown2 on May 20, 2009, 04:12:16 PM
my understanding is that for a replacement dwelling the existing dwelling has to be liveable, ie running water electricity etc, which as stated above seems to rule out the first two, also with the third the chances of getting much more than another 1 bedroom would be slim but im not an expert,


I was in the first one last night. It has running water and there is a fuse box to the mains electricity - I think the vendor has been making sure to keep utilities connected with a view to reselling.
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Onion Bag on May 20, 2009, 04:18:52 PM
Donagh,

you should get a planning permission for any 3 of them, PPS21 allows you to replace as long as it has 4 walls, it doesnt necessarily have to have a roof,

I know cause i have just had one approved recently,

Under the old PPS14 it had to be habitable
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Hank Everlast on May 20, 2009, 04:23:26 PM
Quote from: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?



1st one you will get permission, but it will be like for like, a small dwelling with same ridge level etc and will have to be sited on footprint.

2nd one, same as, but it would have to exhibit essential characteristics of house, eg structural walls, thats it. favour will be give to those proposlas that show significant environmental benefits, eg gettn rid of an eyesore!

3rd, replacement would again be restriced to something similar to existing, floorspace may be able to be increased for example to the rear as long as the visual appearance does not appear any larger.

Planning permission will take different times in different areas, anything from 1 month now (new streamlining process in place) till a few months or longer if there are amendments needed.

Give me a pm if you want any further advice


What ifdown and oakleaf gael are referring to is the old system and the old PPS 14 REGULATIONS.  However they have recently been updated to draft pps21 which gives more leeway!
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: lfdown2 on May 20, 2009, 04:28:59 PM
Quote from: Hank Everlast on May 20, 2009, 04:23:26 PM
Quote from: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?



1st one you will get permission, but it will be like for like, a small dwelling with same ridge level etc and will have to be sited on footprint.

2nd one, same as, but it would have to exhibit essential characteristics of house, eg structural walls, thats it. favour will be give to those proposlas that show significant environmental benefits, eg gettn rid of an eyesore!

3rd, replacement would again be restriced to something similar to existing, floorspace may be able to be increased for example to the rear as long as the visual appearance does not appear any larger.

Planning permission will take different times in different areas, anything from 1 month now (new streamlining process in place) till a few months or longer if there are amendments needed.

Give me a pm if you want any further advice


What ifdown and oakleaf gael are referring to is the old system and the old PPS 14 REGULATIONS.  However they have recently been updated to draft pps21 which gives more leeway!

so are they using the new pps21 while they are still in the consultation process?
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Onion Bag on May 20, 2009, 04:33:00 PM
Yip
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: oakleafgael on May 20, 2009, 04:39:49 PM
Quote from: lfdown2 on May 20, 2009, 04:28:59 PM
Quote from: Hank Everlast on May 20, 2009, 04:23:26 PM
Quote from: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?



1st one you will get permission, but it will be like for like, a small dwelling with same ridge level etc and will have to be sited on footprint.

2nd one, same as, but it would have to exhibit essential characteristics of house, eg structural walls, thats it. favour will be give to those proposlas that show significant environmental benefits, eg gettn rid of an eyesore!

3rd, replacement would again be restriced to something similar to existing, floorspace may be able to be increased for example to the rear as long as the visual appearance does not appear any larger.

Planning permission will take different times in different areas, anything from 1 month now (new streamlining process in place) till a few months or longer if there are amendments needed.

Give me a pm if you want any further advice


What ifdown and oakleaf gael are referring to is the old system and the old PPS 14 REGULATIONS.  However they have recently been updated to draft pps21 which gives more leeway!

so are they using the new pps21 while they are still in the consultation process?

Some councils are working under the pps21 and others are still using pps14 and others are sitting on their arses and doing nothing at all.
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 05:03:10 PM
Quote from: Hank Everlast on May 20, 2009, 04:23:26 PM
1st one you will get permission, but it will be like for like, a small dwelling with same ridge level etc and will have to be sited on footprint.

2nd one, same as, but it would have to exhibit essential characteristics of house, eg structural walls, thats it. favour will be give to those proposlas that show significant environmental benefits, eg gettn rid of an eyesore!

3rd, replacement would again be restriced to something similar to existing, floorspace may be able to be increased for example to the rear as long as the visual appearance does not appear any larger.

Planning permission will take different times in different areas, anything from 1 month now (new streamlining process in place) till a few months or longer if there are amendments needed.

Give me a pm if you want any further advice


What ifdown and oakleaf gael are referring to is the old system and the old PPS 14 REGULATIONS.  However they have recently been updated to draft pps21 which gives more leeway!

Thanks Hank that's very useful. Probably also explains why the first is so much more expensive than the others despite having less land with it. Will maybe get back to you after we've been out to see the second two.
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Hank Everlast on May 21, 2009, 09:00:26 AM
Quote from: oakleafgael on May 20, 2009, 04:39:49 PM
Quote from: lfdown2 on May 20, 2009, 04:28:59 PM
Quote from: Hank Everlast on May 20, 2009, 04:23:26 PM
Quote from: Donagh on May 20, 2009, 03:43:41 PM
Have spotted a few properties in the Mourne area that I'd be interested in but I'm not clued into the complexities of the planning laws. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

The first property is a smallholding with a disused farmhouse and outbuildings. The house is in a bad state of repair and is a little small, so if I was renovating it would almost be a complete rebuild with an extension. Even though I'm not from the area, would it be likely that I could knock and rebuild, or would I just have to renovate whatever is already there?

The second property is a ruined cottage again on a smallholding. The cottage beyond salvaging - no roof and only three walls. What's my chances of getting planning permission for a new build?

The third is a fairly well maintained wee cottage on a smallholding. This only has one bedroom and is way to small for our needs. What would my options be here i.e. could I knock it and build another or would I be restricted to extending?

On a general point, if I was to renovate one of these, what sort of time are you talking before I get a decision on outline planning permission?



1st one you will get permission, but it will be like for like, a small dwelling with same ridge level etc and will have to be sited on footprint.

2nd one, same as, but it would have to exhibit essential characteristics of house, eg structural walls, thats it. favour will be give to those proposlas that show significant environmental benefits, eg gettn rid of an eyesore!

3rd, replacement would again be restriced to something similar to existing, floorspace may be able to be increased for example to the rear as long as the visual appearance does not appear any larger.

Planning permission will take different times in different areas, anything from 1 month now (new streamlining process in place) till a few months or longer if there are amendments needed.

Give me a pm if you want any further advice


What ifdown and oakleaf gael are referring to is the old system and the old PPS 14 REGULATIONS.  However they have recently been updated to draft pps21 which gives more leeway!

so are they using the new pps21 while they are still in the consultation process?

Some councils are working under the pps21 and others are still using pps14 and others are sitting on their arses and doing nothing at all.

No councils are using PPS14 any more, any decisions that were defered for what ever reasons under pps14 are all being re-assesed under 21.

Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Hank Everlast on May 21, 2009, 12:39:01 PM
I forgot to mention that this is El Cuervo's speciality.... the mans well known for his powers in getting planning permission for anything, anywhere!
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: Trevor Hill on July 06, 2009, 02:38:34 PM
Sorry for hijacking Donaghs thread but I dont think this one needs a new thread.
I have found a plot of land for sale with fantastic views at a really good price. It is not being sold as a site with permission, just as a parcel of land. How difficult would it be to get planning permission on land like this? The estate agent says it is a good long term bet, but he is trying to sell it after all and will say anything just to get a sale.
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: downtown on August 23, 2019, 10:41:55 PM
Hi all. Jus a quick question about planning permission if anyone can help. We have a family farm and a site has been passed and a house built on in 2017. Now is there any way to get another site passed on the farm ? I no the rule is 1 site on farm in 10 years. Wondering is there any at around it. Thanks in advance
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: giveherlong on August 23, 2019, 11:20:48 PM
Quote from: Onion Bag on May 20, 2009, 04:18:52 PM
Donagh,

you should get a planning permission for any 3 of them, PPS21 allows you to replace as long as it has 4 walls, it doesnt necessarily have to have a roof,

I know cause i have just had one approved recently,

Under the old PPS14 it had to be habitable

Correct. As long as it demonstrates the characteristics of a house
Walls and chimney breast (not necessary but useful)  would suffice

You could also go for a replacement dwelling on a new location a few metres away and retain the old building. Definitely worth considering
Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: giveherlong on August 23, 2019, 11:23:55 PM
Quote from: Trevor Hill on July 06, 2009, 02:38:34 PM
Sorry for hijacking Donaghs thread but I dont think this one needs a new thread.
I have found a plot of land for sale with fantastic views at a really good price. It is not being sold as a site with permission, just as a parcel of land. How difficult would it be to get planning permission on land like this? The estate agent says it is a good long term bet, but he is trying to sell it after all and will say anything just to get a sale.

Apply for your DARD business ID and flock/herd # as soon as possible once bought

Title: Re: 'Replacement dwellings' and planning regulations in the north.
Post by: giveherlong on August 23, 2019, 11:28:48 PM
Quote from: downtown on August 23, 2019, 10:41:55 PM
Hi all. Jus a quick question about planning permission if anyone can help. We have a family farm and a site has been passed and a house built on in 2017. Now is there any way to get another site passed on the farm ? I no the rule is 1 site on farm in 10 years. Wondering is there any at around it. Thanks in advance

Any chance another family member/relation/friend has a different DARD business ID you could put it through that way? Is there an outfarm you could apply on? Get your own DARD business number applied for in the meantime

Other option is to go for an infill or gap application between 2 or more houses. Or a Replacement dwelling application if you have a derelict house on the farm or even walls which could be fixed up