Donegal vs Armagh Ulster Championship 2022

Started by Armagh18, March 31, 2022, 10:21:31 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

LCohen

Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

2 separate processes. The video was looked at after Armagh submitted their appeals but not because of their appeals.

tonto1888

Seems Rian ONeill has been suspended. Haven't seen anything to confirm tho

Armagh18

Quote from: David McKeown on April 04, 2022, 11:44:53 AM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

I think this is separate to the appeal. The CCCC were always going to look at the video regardless.
Yeah thats what I've heard as well. Any word of the appeals? If we lose the 3 appeals plus Rian we're in big trouble. Although from talking to people that were there Murphy punched Grugan at the end so hopefully he gets a ban to even the thing up slightly.

Average Score

The ref didn't have Murphy in his report or he would have been banned, so he will have gotten away with one.

armaghniac

Quote from: Average Score on April 04, 2022, 12:18:39 PM
The ref didn't have Murphy in his report or he would have been banned, so he will have gotten away with one.

Did the Ref have Rian in his report?
If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B

Armagh18

Quote from: Average Score on April 04, 2022, 12:18:39 PM
The ref didn't have Murphy in his report or he would have been banned, so he will have gotten away with one.
Rian wasn't in it either. His ban is (going by the rumours anyway) a result of video evidence. Hopefully there is video evidence of Murphy as well.

Average Score

Quote from: armaghniac on April 04, 2022, 12:22:01 PM
Quote from: Average Score on April 04, 2022, 12:18:39 PM
The ref didn't have Murphy in his report or he would have been banned, so he will have gotten away with one.

Did the Ref have Rian in his report?

No but Murphy isn't deemed to be striking in the video.

Average Score


LCohen

Quote from: armaghniac on April 04, 2022, 12:22:01 PM
Quote from: Average Score on April 04, 2022, 12:18:39 PM
The ref didn't have Murphy in his report or he would have been banned, so he will have gotten away with one.

Did the Ref have Rian in his report?

Seemingly not. Just the video.

Any player who isn't captured by that one camera angle gets away with whatever they did.

We just have to deal with it

tyrone08

Quote from: LCohen on April 04, 2022, 11:49:27 AM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

2 separate processes. The video was looked at after Armagh submitted their appeals but not because of their appeals.

That's what I meant to say. Armagh would have know that the video is reviewed upon appeal which is strange why they proceeded

tonto1888

Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 12:38:05 PM
Quote from: LCohen on April 04, 2022, 11:49:27 AM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

2 separate processes. The video was looked at after Armagh submitted their appeals but not because of their appeals.

That's what I meant to say. Armagh would have know that the video is reviewed upon appeal which is strange why they proceeded

The video was going to be looked at anyway. This didn't come from armaghs appeal

Armagh18

Quote from: tonto1888 on April 04, 2022, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 12:38:05 PM
Quote from: LCohen on April 04, 2022, 11:49:27 AM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

2 separate processes. The video was looked at after Armagh submitted their appeals but not because of their appeals.

That's what I meant to say. Armagh would have know that the video is reviewed upon appeal which is strange why they proceeded

The video was going to be looked at anyway. This didn't come from armaghs appeal
Have the appeals even been heard yet or when can we expect a decision there?

Average Score

Quote from: tonto1888 on April 04, 2022, 12:46:29 PM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 12:38:05 PM
Quote from: LCohen on April 04, 2022, 11:49:27 AM
Quote from: tyrone08 on April 04, 2022, 11:11:20 AM
Was it not completely stupid of Armagh to appeal the decision in the first place as it was likely that video evidence would be used?

2 separate processes. The video was looked at after Armagh submitted their appeals but not because of their appeals.

That's what I meant to say. Armagh would have know that the video is reviewed upon appeal which is strange why they proceeded

The video was going to be looked at anyway. This didn't come from armaghs appeal

Is that true? Surely they looked at the video because of the appeal to exonerate or uphold as in case of McManus, was Kerry / Dublin video looked at, or Armagh / Tyrone?

Main Street

Isn't there a separate melee thread for Armagh, Tyrone and now Donegal.

armaghniac

Quote from: Main Street on April 04, 2022, 01:42:53 PM
Isn't there a separate melee thread for Armagh, Tyrone and now Donegal.

It wouldn't be right to pile into a melee thread.
If at first you don't succeed, then goto Plan B