Mick Wallace, NAMA and the £7M

Started by Nigel White, July 04, 2015, 11:18:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Declan

Some irony given the upcoming 100 year celebration of independence


Nama's actions have enslaved us
Posted in Sunday Business Post


The elderly, weather-beaten women are dressed in black and glorious purple, the traditional Caribbean colours of mourning. They file up to pay their respects at the beautiful St John's Church on the savage Atlantic coast of Barbados. The low murmur of the shuffling throng is punctured by the squawk of the rooster who stands, sentry-like, at the door of this magnificent church. No one seems to notice him as he clucks, pecks and flaps around.

The scene is pure rural Caribbean, except for one thing: dotted among the black mourners – descendants of slaves – are some white people. Well, not so much white, as whitish!

These whites are not the affluent, chino-wearing, golf-playing whites of upscale Barbados. These are poor, very poor whites. As I watch them line up solemnly at St John's, where a church has stood since 1630, they all display the universal tell-tale sign of poverty: rotten and missing teeth.

These people are the last of the 'red legs', the distant demographic echo of Irish slaves sent to Barbados by Cromwell. It is thought that between 1645 and 1660, 40,000 Irish captives were sold into Caribbean slavery from Ireland, via Liverpool and Bristol to Barbados and beyond. As with all slave trades, the people were sold via middlemen. They didn't walk willingly to Waterford port. They were traded. They were driven off their land in Ireland, huge tracts of which were given to Cromwell's victorious NCOs, and then sold by the gombeen men to slave traders.

Four thousand miles away, as their fair skin blistered and burned, they became known as 'red legs'. In barren eastern Barbados, the red legs toiled in the sugar plantations on the margins of society, rejected by the local white English aristocracy and the black slaves.

It's amazing to think that slavery was legal, isn't it?

Over the years their numbers have shrunk to just a handful of small communities, desperately poor pockets of poor white Irish red legs.

In the past two generations they have begun to intermarry with the local black population. The most famous product of such a marriage is Barbados' biggest star, Rihanna, who tells of being slagged by local black kids, her mates, for being too pale and, worse still, being part red leg. Rihanna's father was a mix of black and red leg.

I am sitting in Martin's Bay in western Barbados where the Atlantic, driven by the African trade winds, smashes into the first piece of land since Sierra Leone. This side of Barbados is a world away from the sandy beaches, jet-skis and offshore banking of the sheltered Caribbean side. This is the windswept and exposed last stronghold of the red legs.

Sandy Lane it is not.

As I considered the future of this tiny Irish tribe, the 'assets' Cromwell's middlemen traded for pennies, the words Colm O'Rourke declared last year came to mind: "The reality is that Nama is, with official blessing, overseeing the greatest plundering of Irish assets since the Cromwellian plantations."

I realise he was being a bit over the top, but the notion that Nama is the modern-day equivalent of a 17th-century middleman who is trading assets isn't too far removed from reality.

In the past eight years, huge tracts of Ireland have been sold by Nama at deep discounts to vulture funds. This went on under the radar, in effect transferring enormous wealth out of Ireland to foreigners. Maybe it wasn't the Cromwellian plantations, but it is hard to think of another country whose own government sanctioned such a fire sale of national assets.

For the past few years, having bought up the assets, the vultures have been hovering over their prey, but now they are ready to swoop. As this paper reports today, the vulture funds are now moving against the former owners, squeezing the last few quid out of their Irish assets.

Here's what's happening. European interest rates are below zero because Europe's economy is a mess. The euro is plummeting against the dollar.

So if you are an American vulture fund, what do you do?

You borrow in euro, even though you are American, and you watch your borrowing costs fall as the euro exchange rate falls. Then you take this 'free' money and you go to Ireland, where the locals have no credit, and you buy up bundles of loans from their government – the very people who are supposed to be protecting the financial interest of the Irish people.

Remember Nama – an agent of the state – was supposed to get credit going? Well, it is getting credit going all right – but it is foreign credit. We are middlemen in the global credit cycle. The vulture capitalists know this, but are too clever to admit it and the Irish political class are too stupid to realise it.

Most vulture funds have a rule called the three-thirty rule.

This means they buy and hold for a maximum of three years and once they make 30 per cent, they are out. This is their twist. Now they are moving to get the most out of the assets before they sell.

Initially, the vultures bought up the glittering swanky office prizes in Dublin – and with various geniuses heralding their brilliance even though it was nothing more than having the access to capital at a time when our country was on the canvas. In the past year or so, the vultures delved deeper into the economic carcass.

Deep inside the financial entrails are the loans of small and medium-sized businesses, the property loans of petrol station owners, publicans and undertakers. The vultures love this type of soft tissue.

Thousands of small businesses are now under the control of vulture funds.

The strategy of the funds is to buy as cheaply as possible and sweat the asset until the yield on the property rises. Once the yield or the income of the property rises, they can re-rate the price of the property upwards. In finance, this is almost formulaic. But in reality it is far from a formula.

Re-rating the property value upwards at a time of low inflation will involve putting up rents, squeezing the owners – who are pretty much bust and may have one business (a pub, say) which is throwing off just enough cash to pay the interest on the property. Now the vultures are using the Irish courts to come after the other assets of the unfortunate owners. So if the 'loan' for a house was secured against a pub, for example, both the pub and the house are now being claimed by the vultures.

In the next few months, the courts will decide how many of Ireland's small businesses will be handed over to these funds. This transfer of assets is taking place right under our nose. It is a disaster for the country, for the society and for the capital base of the economy, and yet it is legal.

But then again, so too was slavery – once.

mikehunt

Ah now, don't be deflecting from the real issue here. Selling billions worth of state assets at below market value is immaterial when compared with those "anti water loons". The rise in homeless numbers and those on trollies in our hospitals has nothing to do with this transfer of wealth from the poor to the rich. There is a recovery happening and we need to keep it going. Tens of billionaires are relying on us.

gallsman

No chat about the latest revelations? Can't help but think the spotlight team have more on this on the political side.

The Trap

Agree Gallsman. Think by naming Sammy, Peter and the son on the show they are giving us a wee glimpse of what they suspect...........

NAG1

Quote from: gallsman on September 07, 2016, 01:08:47 PM
No chat about the latest revelations? Can't help but think the spotlight team have more on this on the political side.

I get the feeling that they are drip feeding the story to pull as much out of it as they can.

With the legal proceedings going along side the are playing a cautious long game.

gallsman

Cushnahan got a fairly good going over nonetheless!

Franko

I take it from all this that Miskelly is the chief source of all the information coming out and is feeding Wallace and Bryson?

How long before he is 'silenced' in one way or another?

93-DY-SAM

There isn't much noise today out of the the same people who had the knives out for Mairtin O'Mullieor last week.

gallsman

Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 02:18:23 PM
There isn't much noise today out of the the same people who had the knives out for Mairtin O'Mullieor last week.

None of this makes what McKay was up to any less idiotic.

93-DY-SAM

Quote from: gallsman on September 07, 2016, 03:22:44 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 02:18:23 PM
There isn't much noise today out of the the same people who had the knives out for Mairtin O'Mullieor last week.

None of this makes what McKay was up to any less idiotic.

Nobody said it wasn't.

gallsman

Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 03:37:04 PM
Quote from: gallsman on September 07, 2016, 03:22:44 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 02:18:23 PM
There isn't much noise today out of the the same people who had the knives out for Mairtin O'Mullieor last week.

None of this makes what McKay was up to any less idiotic.

Nobody said it wasn't.

My point is that the knives won't be tucked away. If MOM has a hint of something to answer for, they'll still be going for him.

TabClear

Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 03:37:04 PM
Quote from: gallsman on September 07, 2016, 03:22:44 PM
Quote from: 93-DY-SAM on September 07, 2016, 02:18:23 PM
There isn't much noise today out of the the same people who had the knives out for Mairtin O'Mullieor last week.

None of this makes what McKay was up to any less idiotic.

Nobody said it wasn't.

It actually makes it worse. There is clearly enough shenanigans going on that the dup are up to their necks in and McKay had managed to deflect attention away from the real issues.

omagh_gael

Surely Sinn Fein's top dogs knew to bide their time with the NAMA situation and would have been well enough clued in to not leave themselves exposed. Could McKay have actually went on a solo run with this and his axing was the correct thing to do? Btw, I'm no Sinn Fein sheep so this is not a defence of their actions.

balladmaker

QuoteIt actually makes it worse. There is clearly enough shenanigans going on that the dup are up to their necks in and McKay had managed to deflect attention away from the real issues.

McKay story is old news now, and should in no way be allowed to deflect from the greater story, what went on with the NAMA deal, and what local politicians were up to their neck in it.  Spotlight have a lot more to add yet I would think, but they're biding their time.

gallsman

Quote from: balladmaker on September 08, 2016, 03:58:28 PM
QuoteIt actually makes it worse. There is clearly enough shenanigans going on that the dup are up to their necks in and McKay had managed to deflect attention away from the real issues.

McKay story is old news now, and should in no way be allowed to deflect from the greater story, what went on with the NAMA deal, and what local politicians were up to their neck in it.  Spotlight have a lot more to add yet I would think, but they're biding their time.

It shouldn't be, but it can, does and will. Which makes it all the more idiotic. This was an over the fences home run that they've really tried their best to f**k up.