Armagh management :Paddy O'Rourke!!!

Started by armaghniac, July 21, 2009, 05:35:51 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

full back

Quote from: Apple Crumble on July 27, 2009, 03:01:55 PM
I jut heard that the Armagh board have spoken to Greg Blaney & James McCarten about the position.

Whats your thoughts on that?

That you are smoking the funny stuff too early on a Monday

man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

Orior

Quote from: Apple Crumble on July 27, 2009, 03:01:55 PM
I jut heard that the Armagh board have spoken to Greg Blaney & James McCarten about the position.

Whats your thoughts on that?

Greg's Dad is from Armagh, and in his younger days James went to many a houlie in nearby Lurgan.

Other than that, its close to a good wind-up, but no cigar.
Cover me in chocolate and feed me to the lesbians

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)

So out of interest, what has your source been right on before?

full back

Suprised you are entertaining this WUM Corn

Check through his posts, when he has a quiet day at work he is on here talking sh1te

Laugh at him & send him on his way

man in black

Quote from: full back on July 27, 2009, 03:21:17 PM
Suprised you are entertaining this WUM Corn

Check through his posts, when he has a quiet day at work he is on here talking sh1te

Laugh at him & send him on his way

What makes you so sure what im saying isn't correct, i havent even mentioned any names.......... as yet.

Check back through my posts - who's having a quiet day ? ;D
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:18:34 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)

So out of interest, what has your source been right on before?


Just about everything, as a member of the panel he would be party to plenty of info. Although in fairness its usually several months before info surfaces.

'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

corn02

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:56:15 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:18:34 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)

So out of interest, what has your source been right on before?


Just about everything, as a member of the panel he would be party to plenty of info. Although in fairness its usually several months before info surfaces.



Like what? You said he hasn;t been wrong, what was he right about?

man in black

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:59:27 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:56:15 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:18:34 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)

So out of interest, what has your source been right on before?


Just about everything, as a member of the panel he would be party to plenty of info. Although in fairness its usually several months before info surfaces.



Like what? You said he hasn;t been wrong, what was he right about?

The Stephen Kernan / Grimley issue
The 2 players alluded to beforehand trying to run the dressing room
the fall out between 2 very senior players before the Armagh Fermanagh match 2004
McConville McEntee issue
McGeeney Swift and Toal issue
McConville and air miles
Lots lots more.........
I'd be embarrassed to be an Armagh fan :D
'Till things are brighter, I'm the Man In Black

corn02

So you're not an Armagh fan yet a panel member told you this, so he is the leak?

JMohan

McDonnell himself said it was high profile sub over the weekend that he suspected as being the leak I think

JMohan

Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 04:21:57 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:59:27 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:56:15 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:18:34 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:10:25 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 03:06:47 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 03:02:53 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 02:49:57 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 02:37:06 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 01:05:58 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 12:57:05 PM
Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 12:32:56 PM
Quote from: man in black on July 27, 2009, 11:56:36 AM
The leaks were down to 2 individuals on the team that shouldnt have been on the Armagh team, they are both past it and one of them never really had it in the first place. As a near neighbour all you can do is laugh. ;D

Is quite obvious who you are alluding too, you would need to be careful making such claims, especially as they are incorrect.

Really ? And you would know this how ?

Because you are talking w**k.

Well my source is yet to be wrong, and how do we even know we are talking about the same people ?

Possibly I picked it up wrong, in your orginal post dd you mean team or panel?



Team

Well it narrows it down when you say they are past it because by my reckoning only 3 players were over the 27/28 mark.

Not strike you as weird that starters would try and make things more difficult for themselves?


I didnt stop them talking / trying to run the show in the dressing room by all accounts. I could see through if it if they had the sort of presence of a McGeeney or a Canavan, but them pair ? ::)

So out of interest, what has your source been right on before?


Just about everything, as a member of the panel he would be party to plenty of info. Although in fairness its usually several months before info surfaces.



Like what? You said he hasn;t been wrong, what was he right about?
The Stephen Kernan / Grimley issue
The 2 players alluded to beforehand trying to run the dressing room
the fall out between 2 very senior players before the Armagh Fermanagh match 2004
McConville McEntee issue
McGeeney Swift and Toal issue
McConville and air miles
Lots lots more.........
I'd be embarrassed to be an Armagh fan :D


? Here's my take on that ..


The Stephen Kernan / Grimley issue - That's old news
The 2 players alluded to beforehand trying to run the dressing room - Everyone knew that
the fall out between 2 very senior players before the Armagh Fermanagh match 2004 - That's news to me
McConville McEntee issue - That was rumour
McGeeney Swift and Toal issue - That's news too
McConville and air miles - Not sure which McConville story this is !!!


corn02

Quote from: JMohan on July 27, 2009, 05:34:41 PM
McDonnell himself said it was high profile sub over the weekend that he suspected as being the leak I think

Did he though? Or did the Tribune just make that claim on hearsay?

Edit: If he was quoted as saying that I stand corrected.

JMohan

Quote from: corn02 on July 27, 2009, 05:48:10 PM
Quote from: JMohan on July 27, 2009, 05:34:41 PM
McDonnell himself said it was high profile sub over the weekend that he suspected as being the leak I think

Did he though? Or did the Tribune just make that claim on hearsay?

Edit: If he was quoted as saying that I stand corrected.
Sorry - I stand corrected - just rechecked it.


That said... it was such a clinical statement it stood out in my mind at the time - I personally would be amazed if it didn't originate very close to PMcD.


bennydorano

#269
Boys, the saboteur was outed last week on OC.  Someone registered on OC and posted a scathing paragraph or two that rang true and confirmed what I had heard on a couple of ocassions. I thought it was common knowledge who had released the details of the team and it certainly wasn't a sub, and reading that article I would suspect that McDonnell was never contacted because he sure as feck knows who it was.