"She chose to use that time to try and put evidence in front of the jury that was not considered by all the experts, legal and scientific, to be relevant to the case"
From my knowledge of the case the mother asked questions (very relevant and legitimate questions which the DPP seemed to have skipped over), she did not put evedence in front of the jury as the jury deliberations had concluded and this was just a sentencing hearing.
I heard what Judge Carney said and he seemed tio refer to the mother in quite outlandish terms - she might just look at a defamation action herself! Why did he remove her name in the a ctual lecture when he had already left it in the pre-event press release which he sent to the papers.
In general I get the impression that the judiciary in Ireland are far removed from reality when it comes to sentencing. Couple this with a DPP thatseems too ready to plea bargain (the Gerry Mc Cabe case being an obvious example) and victims rarely see justice done.
From my knowledge of the case the mother asked questions (very relevant and legitimate questions which the DPP seemed to have skipped over), she did not put evedence in front of the jury as the jury deliberations had concluded and this was just a sentencing hearing.
I heard what Judge Carney said and he seemed tio refer to the mother in quite outlandish terms - she might just look at a defamation action herself! Why did he remove her name in the a ctual lecture when he had already left it in the pre-event press release which he sent to the papers.
In general I get the impression that the judiciary in Ireland are far removed from reality when it comes to sentencing. Couple this with a DPP thatseems too ready to plea bargain (the Gerry Mc Cabe case being an obvious example) and victims rarely see justice done.