Beggan was basically walking back when the break for the 3rd goal was on, looked very bad.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Nanderson on April 02, 2024, 06:27:01 PMQuote from: Armamike on April 02, 2024, 06:22:28 PMServices toQuote from: AustinPowers on April 02, 2024, 06:17:22 PMWhen did big Jeff get his knighthood? And what did he actually get it for?
I mean , he never won Wimbledon or an Olympic gold medal like those other deserving knighted folk.
Very good question.saying nopolitics. I'd say he was shoe in to be fast tracked into Lords when he lost the MP seat in lagan valley. Obviously losing the seat is a guarantee now and his lordship is well and truely in the mud
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on April 01, 2024, 03:49:59 PMQuote from: nrico2006 on April 01, 2024, 02:13:11 PMQuote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 02:00:38 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:48:27 PMQuote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 01:33:43 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:20:29 PMhttps://x.com/so_92/status/1774758687636070636?s=46&t=F_sQ_3viFZ6zidQYNagDEA
Good angle to show that Lane didn't see the incident at the time. Turn round due to the crowd's reaction
So he turned around, observed a player lying on the ground and an opponent standing over him, but didn't think to stop play to adjudicate.
That seems like good refereeing.
So are you saying you want the referee to stop play every time that situation arises?
So a team on the attack in the final minutes of a game, a player on the defending hits the ground, the crowd reacts, referee stops play, consults all his other officials, nobody seen anything. Play restarts with a free to the attacking team which they aren't allowed to score from and the defending team are now set with everyone back and marking their opponents.
Fair point.
But is he not in communication with his supporting officials, i.e. when a linesman witnesses an actual legitimate assault/incident and informs the referee of the incident. It seemed like the linesman saw that happen yesterday.
Jesus this is nauseating!!
Linesmen do NOT HAVE THE POWER to award a free.
At that point he rest of your point is pointless
Quote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 02:00:38 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:48:27 PMQuote from: Derryman forever on April 01, 2024, 01:33:43 PMQuote from: cornerback on April 01, 2024, 01:20:29 PMhttps://x.com/so_92/status/1774758687636070636?s=46&t=F_sQ_3viFZ6zidQYNagDEA
Good angle to show that Lane didn't see the incident at the time. Turn round due to the crowd's reaction
So he turned around, observed a player lying on the ground and an opponent standing over him, but didn't think to stop play to adjudicate.
That seems like good refereeing.
So are you saying you want the referee to stop play every time that situation arises?
So a team on the attack in the final minutes of a game, a player on the defending hits the ground, the crowd reacts, referee stops play, consults all his other officials, nobody seen anything. Play restarts with a free to the attacking team which they aren't allowed to score from and the defending team are now set with everyone back and marking their opponents.
Fair point.
Quote from: thewobbler on April 01, 2024, 11:27:10 AMQuote from: nrico2006 on April 01, 2024, 11:19:25 AMQuote from: thewobbler on April 01, 2024, 11:03:05 AMReferees have been called back, at the next break in play, by umpires and linesmen to discuss off-the-ball incidents, since forever and a day. Some will act on their fellow official's advice and administer cards, some will not. But I don't yet think I've ever seen the previous passage of play cancelled as a result of the retrospective card / cards.
I think some people have been watching too much association football and its bizarre and erratic implementation of VAR, and gotten confused.
Nah, common sense really. Throw ball should be the next step at a minimum.
And what if from the resultant passage of play, a high ball goes in, two players challenge awkwardly, then get up off the floor and beat the reed out of each other in front of the referee?
Is it commonsense to ignore that passage of play too and just take the game back to a free for Derry where Fenton's lash out took place?
Quote from: thewobbler on April 01, 2024, 11:03:05 AMReferees have been called back, at the next break in play, by umpires and linesmen to discuss off-the-ball incidents, since forever and a day. Some will act on their fellow official's advice and administer cards, some will not. But I don't yet think I've ever seen the previous passage of play cancelled as a result of the retrospective card / cards.
I think some people have been watching too much association football and its bizarre and erratic implementation of VAR, and gotten confused.
Quote from: Rossfan on April 01, 2024, 10:32:54 AMIncident happened, ref didn't see it as he was following the ball.
After the ball went out of play for a 45 he was alerted to the incident and took what he believed was the appropriate action i.e red card.
Then play resumed with the 45.
If a Derry forward hit a Dublin defender off the ball at the same time , got sent off, it wouldn't be a free out for Dublin.
Quote from: Armagh18 on April 01, 2024, 09:49:34 AMQuote from: nrico2006 on April 01, 2024, 09:42:45 AMWhy did the ref not give a free after Fentons foul?Never seen a free given for that situation? Red card was correct call.