Lol
Actually - keep slagging off the Tyronies
Don't know what I was thinking there ...
Actually - keep slagging off the Tyronies
Don't know what I was thinking there ...
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: laoislad on October 11, 2013, 10:27:59 PMGood result for your lot v MontenegroQuote from: camanchero on October 11, 2013, 09:40:52 PM
Lol
f**king typos
Good young players I meant!
Not bad for a rudderless side that didn't have any cohesion et
A bit of organisation etc and the same bunch with diff formation and some positivity and belief...
Bad result for yer lot against Azerbaijan.
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on August 30, 2013, 09:44:34 AM
Inane or me having a bitta craic at Celtic supporters, no difference to winding up Tyrone, Antrim Kerry or any other 'team'. Very sensitive and with this being a discussion board and me being a member of it, I'll come on a post what I like, I don't expect you to like it.
So I await your answer, he/she/it? what age are you?
Quote from: Zulu on September 03, 2013, 12:49:17 PM
I see no reason for Dublin to change their style of play and I certainly wouldn't change the forward line unless it's to bring in Rock as a direct replacement
for someone. No reason for either team to set up to counter the other, just go out and play your own game and see who wins. It's worked for both teams so far and I would be shocked if either team changes that approach now.
If anything this game could top the Dublin/Kerry game.
Quote from: sam03/05 on July 08, 2013, 06:31:48 PMThat sums up my opinion on cork too.
Cork have a woeful manager, with no tactical know how at all.
If they had someone like McGuiness or Harte they would have won five All Ireland's with the players they have at their disposal.
A lucky All Ireland win against one of the worst teams to reach a final in the last twenty years, is all they have to show despite having an abundance of talent.
Quote from: Zulu on July 08, 2013, 04:06:35 PMSwinging the arm in is deemed to be akin to swinging a punch - so it was a free irrespective.Quotehe certainly won the ball well, but referees have been told to give a free should this be done with the 'far' arm swinging in.
That's not in the rule book so it can't have been a free. Duffy was totally wrong but it's to be expected at this stage.
Quote from: LCohen on May 06, 2013, 06:21:48 PMYour questions have been addressed.Quote from: camanchero on May 02, 2013, 12:29:22 AMQuote from: LCohen on May 01, 2013, 07:33:15 PMYep the majority of those have been dealt with or discussed on the thread I believe, if not in direct answer to your posts.Quote from: lynchbhoy on April 29, 2013, 10:43:32 PMQuote from: LCohen on April 29, 2013, 10:04:17 PMany questions have been answered.
lads - what about all those questions I been asking? Not a wee not embarrassed by the lack of answers?
You may not like the answers I provide but I do at least have the decency to en gage in the dialogue and defend my position.
funnily enough, you dont seem to like the answes you are getting either - running away from them or attempting to deflect by claiming 'typo' !
unless you figure out what democracy actually is, there is no point in you pretending you are engaging in any actual debate.
you will find out soon enough though, that unlike your community and their behaviour in the apartheidesque days of the 6 county abhoration, the reunited Ireland will be an easy place to live in for you folks - far from the picture you seem to have in your minds.
just the problems of normal society to contend with - once you lose the chip on your shoulder and the notion of looking to take offence.
My questions have been answered? Where?
An international border is redrawn to reflect majority different views either end of the new border gets labelled here a "false political entity". The inference is that the former Yugoslav republics are to be abolished. I ask must Yugoslavia be re-united against the democratic wishes of its people(s)? Point out the answer please.
NI has been labelled a "gerrymandered state". I have asked is the problem the precise line of the border? Who has answered this?
Some seem to favour a redrawing of the border - who is leading the political campaign for this? Would SF accept a re-drawing of the border? No answer.
Would the people in border areas of the 6 counties who voted Yes for a united Ireland in a future referendum be happy for their votes to be used to re-draw the border but not achieve a united Ireland?
What was Britain to do in the face of a vocal majority pre-partition? What are they do now with a pro-union majority? How would these proposals have played out internationally? How would it play out today? Can there ever be a United Ireland that does not have majority support north and south? Surely these are fundamental questions. I have asked them Who has answered them?
I asked two different posters if they would respect a vote by a majority in the 6 countes to stay in UK? No answers.
I asked why nobody was out in front of the cameras defending that particular political stance? No answer.
When was there last a political will in RoI to unify the island in circumstances other than in the presence of a majority in favour in NI? Question asked but not answered.
A smaller NI could have been created at the outset - who pushed for it? No answer.
On the point of violence and murder who has pointed out the achievement of Repulicans in respect of the border? Which violent acts/murders were worth it? Who has been able to justify the republican terror campaign?
Which acts of violence/murder relieved the oppression of Catholics?
Which IRA acts achieved their stated goal? (plenty to chose from)
Were the acts of violence/murder ever going to achieve a British withdrawal? How would that have played out internationally? No answers.
What good does murder motivated by retaliation do? Can retaliation be used to justify murder? No answers?
A poster indicated that because peaceful protest did not achieve its goals immediately that that was evidence enough cease operating on peaceful means and starting a campaign of terror. I asked the poster whether the campaign of violence achieved its goals immediately? No reply.
Who has pointed out the Irish ruler who has ruled the entire Island?
In the absence of this where does the obviousness of the united island come from?
I was accused of denying protestant misrule/discrimination and of defending both crimes. I asked for the refernces that form the basis of this accusation. No answers.
A poster claimed that the IRA committed acts of violence and murder to STOP unionist/loyalist violence. I asked for peer reviewed works that detail and endorses this strategy. No answers.
I asked how phoning a firm of taxis and shooting the driver, walking into a protestant owned shop and shooting someone behind the counter or planting a bomb in the centre of a majority protestant town not be considered targeting? No answer.
I asked whether broad brush targeting made acts more justifable? No answers.
Others are non questions - such as the drawing up of/re-drawing of the border, only you seem keen on this.
Its not me who is calling for a redrawing of the border.
And no the questions have not been answered. May I should pick 3 or 4 as an initail batch and ask you to pint out where they have been answered?