Racist attacks in Belfast

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 10:37:35 PM

The media have done nothing illegal saying he has been arrested but a lot of people have now asumed he is guilty. Maybe he is, maybe he is not. Was like Owen Mulligan case all over front pages in papers but when he was not charged it made about two sentences on page 8... wasn't a story for them anymore. As for hoods in Tiger Bay-dont really get that arguement. You mean If it was a hood from tigers bay would I assume he is guilty? No-how the f** would I know if he is guilty or not til goes to court.

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 10:49:40 PM

Quote from: Tony Baloney on July 02, 2009, 10:36:18 PM
Quote from: hardstation on July 02, 2009, 10:03:14 PM
If he is proven to be guilty:

I don't care how drunk he was.
I don't care who his da is and what he has done for anyone or anything.
I don't care where he is from.
I don't care what religion he is.
Talk of him being any better than the "animals who instigated it" is ridiculous.

If he did it, he is the scum of the earth and should be treated as such.
It is strange how the situation changes for some on this board when the villain is a middle class Catholic sc**bag rather than a Loyalist sc**bag.

If he did it.
Agree 100% Hardstation. It's gone quiet in some quarters.

Fox do us a favour with the conspiracy theories please. He damaged a church which is the act of a sc**bag from any side of the house. But really what does the PSNI have to gain by tipping their hat to the media? Nothing. It'll be old news by next week.

A few people are trying to dress this up with qualifications that he's innocent until proven guilty, his da is a great gaa man etc etc. None of which matters a f**k. Such qualification in the condemnation of these acts wouldn't be forthcoming for a working class catholic or protestant.

Am having diffs highlighting text here but Baloney were you say, "He damaged a church which is an act of a sc**bag..." That is unreal-hope you never get put on jury service

pintsofguinness · July 02, 2009, 10:52:01 PM

Quote from: longrunsthefox on July 02, 2009, 10:37:35 PM
The media have done nothing illegal saying he has been arrested but a lot of people have now asumed he is guilty. Maybe he is, maybe he is not. Was like Owen Mulligan case all over front pages in papers but when he was not charged it made about two sentences on page 8... wasn't a story for them anymore. As for hoods in Tiger Bay-dont really get that arguement. You mean If it was a hood from tigers bay would I assume he is guilty? No-how the f** would I know if he is guilty or not til goes to court.

Are you taking the piss? This time last week you were announcing you were glad a man was dead because he was a paedophile yet that man had never been convicted of anything.

I dont understand

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 10:55:57 PM

Are you following me pints

pintsofguinness · July 02, 2009, 10:56:33 PM

Quote from: longrunsthefox on July 02, 2009, 10:55:57 PM
Are you following me pints

No, but I'd like to know what the difference is?

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 11:03:02 PM

Well the last time we got at this I got a ban... if this boy pays $40 million to the church to stay out of court and there is video footage of him running towards the church with a bottle in his hand I will say he is guilty whether the court clears him or not... you know like the late MJ admitting he liked getting into bed with other peoples children

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 11:08:54 PM

who

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 11:10:17 PM

When the f** was I in court ?

pintsofguinness · July 02, 2009, 11:13:14 PM

Quote from: longrunsthefox on July 02, 2009, 11:03:02 PM
Well the last time we got at this I got a ban... if this boy pays $40 million to the church to stay out of court and there is video footage of him running towards the church with a bottle in his hand I will say he is guilty whether the court clears him or not... you know like the late MJ admitting he liked getting into bed with other peoples children

Well that's not what you got banned for is it? Anyway, lets not get bogged down in that.

You have been crying on this thread about people assuming this fella was guilty yet you assume Jackson was guilty. I think it says it all, I'm done here.

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 11:16:12 PM

Did I not read on the board pints you are an advocate of beating children... says it all too. I think you are trying to lure to get another ban. Yeah, me too, done here

pintsofguinness · July 02, 2009, 11:17:51 PM

Quote from: longrunsthefox on July 02, 2009, 11:16:12 PM
Did I not read on the board pints you are an advocate of beating children... says it all too. I think you are trying to lure to get another ban. Yeah, me too, done here

I think you're just caught talking shite.

Gaoth Dobhair Abu · July 02, 2009, 11:19:40 PM

HS and the rest of you warriors, in no way was I condoning what this lad did (if he did - reasonable still to assume innocent until proven guilty?

).
I don't give a shitte who his father is, I don't give a shitte what his religion is (I mentioned this as a reason why he may well be prosecuted rather then have a slap on the wrist!).

FFS now let me spell it out, IF the boy is convicted then he deserves the full force of the law brought down on him, cowardly and disgusting act.

longrunsthefox · July 02, 2009, 11:20:50 PM

Quote from: pintsofguinness on July 02, 2009, 11:17:51 PM
Quote from: longrunsthefox on July 02, 2009, 11:16:12 PM
Did I not read on the board pints you are an advocate of beating children... says it all too. I think you are trying to lure to get another ban. Yeah, me too, done here

I think you're just caught talking shite.

Gaoth Dobhair Abu · July 02, 2009, 11:35:03 PM

Quote from: hardstation on July 02, 2009, 11:24:28 PM
GDA, you said "even if he was the lesser villian, as compared to the animals who instigated the attacks". I don't buy that at all.

As for your "Costly pint" comment. I believe that to be nonsense also.

Well HS if they put as much effort into getting the animals (would use the same word for the boys who stoned the church) who drove aprox. 100-130 Romas out of the north as they are doing now with these ones then I'll be very happy.

The more rascist cnuts they get off the streets the better. Be they green or orange.

As for the costly pint remark - well its pretty obvious what thats in reference to, and if proven quite relevent.

Gaoth Dobhair Abu · July 02, 2009, 11:53:22 PM

Quote from: hardstation on July 02, 2009, 11:41:03 PM
The costly pint remark is a load of horseshit, in my opinion.
I'll throw this one at you:

A group of men leave a pub in Coleraine (presumably drunk). They give some poor man a kicking because he is Catholic, which leads to his death.
Costly pint?

A group of men who have been drinking all day in Belfast city centre decide to dander up Castle St to slabber and fight with Fenians. They slice an innocent man's throat outside Cosgroves.
Costly pint (had they been caught)?

Bollix.

Ah ffs HS thought you had a wee bit of cope on - "costly pint" because the dick is studying Law and if he's convicted then his chosen career path is fcuked. Nothing more nothing less - and please don't waste your time trying to read any more into it. Comment made because of the fellas circumstances.