Tyrone v Kerry NFL Round 2

Started by Kerry Mike, February 01, 2009, 04:11:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

orangeman

Quote from: ziggysego on February 23, 2009, 12:01:20 AM
I heard a short while ago, Ricey got 6 weeks. Anyone else hear that?


Picked up a 6 week ban alright -

Why 6 weeks and not 4 or 8 ? Which offence was it ?

rrhf

Which was worse Meath men, Riceys antics as horrible as they were or your much vaunted full back breaking Murphys fingers in the handshake before the match? 

Zapatista


tyroneStatto

Quote from: orangeman on February 23, 2009, 09:15:08 AM
Quote from: ziggysego on February 23, 2009, 12:01:20 AM
I heard a short while ago, Ricey got 6 weeks. Anyone else hear that?


Picked up a 6 week ban alright -

Why 6 weeks and not 4 or 8 ? Which offence was it ?

didnt know you could get a 6 week ban at adult level?

orangeman

Quote from: rrhf on February 23, 2009, 09:16:52 AM
Which was worse Meath men, Riceys antics as horrible as they were or your much vaunted full back breaking Murphys fingers in the handshake before the match? 



Which fingers were they rrhf ?? Which incident are you referring to ?


Meath men wouldn't have done anything like that now would they ?

Final Whistle

I think 6 weeks is about right. Too much furore kicked up by the southern media (they will get the rules changed again if they thought it would stop Ulster teams winning) to have only a 4 week ban, altough 6 weeks is strange.

It should be accepted and you can bet your bottom dollar that Harte will turn it into a motivational tool come late summer.


tonesfirstandlast

Apparently he had the choice of a six week suspension or getting his balls squeezed every morning for a fortnight and he chose the suspension.

Final Whistle

Quote from: tonesfirstandlast on February 23, 2009, 10:03:20 AM
Apparently he had the choice of a six week suspension or getting his balls squeezed every morning for a fortnight and he chose the suspension.

Who was the proposed squeezer???

tonesfirstandlast

Quote from: Final Whistle on February 23, 2009, 10:35:12 AM
Quote from: tonesfirstandlast on February 23, 2009, 10:03:20 AM
Apparently he had the choice of a six week suspension or getting his balls squeezed every morning for a fortnight and he chose the suspension.

Who was the proposed squeezer???

There would have been no shortage of volunteers!!!! ;D

Jinxy

Quote from: Final Whistle on February 23, 2009, 09:36:03 AM
I think 6 weeks is about right. Too much furore kicked up by the southern media (they will get the rules changed again if they thought it would stop Ulster teams winning) to have only a 4 week ban, altough 6 weeks is strange.

It should be accepted and you can bet your bottom dollar that Harte will turn it into a motivational tool come late summer.



:D
If you were any use you'd be playing.

ziggysego

Just had it confirmed from a very good source. 6 weeks for Ricey.
Testing Accessibility

orangeman

Quote from: Final Whistle on February 23, 2009, 10:35:12 AM
Quote from: tonesfirstandlast on February 23, 2009, 10:03:20 AM
Apparently he had the choice of a six week suspension or getting his balls squeezed every morning for a fortnight and he chose the suspension.

Who was the proposed squeezer???
[/b]


Ambrose O'Donovan.

corn02

Quote from: ziggysego on February 23, 2009, 11:04:43 AM
Just had it confirmed from a very good source. 6 weeks for Ricey.


You mean every paper?  ;)

Rois

Don't think he'll be appealing it, or at least won't be advised to appeal it - from a conversation I had last week with some learned legal counsel.

BennyHarp

Six weeks for sexual assault seems a bit lenient!!
That was never a square ball!!