The OFFICIAL Liverpool Supporters thread

Started by Gabriel_Hurl, November 09, 2006, 10:52:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages 1 ... 540 541 542 543 544 ... 616
User actions

corn02

#8115
January 13, 2009, 10:28:20 PM
Quote from: pintsofguinness on January 13, 2009, 09:19:43 PM
Could well be bullshit corn (probably is) but why would the police release evidence to the media?

Fair enough, but I don't recall any mention of CCTV? You got to wonder how someobdy would know abolut this supposed footage. Plus sounds a bit savage for the chipped tooth he suffered.

magpie seanie

#8116
January 14, 2009, 09:24:17 AM
I see Torres seems to think Rafa is incorrect. The cheek of him to question his manager - he should be left to rot on the bench for the rest of the year!

Minder

#8117
January 14, 2009, 09:29:19 AM
Quote from: magpie seanie on January 14, 2009, 09:24:17 AM
I see Torres seems to think Rafa is incorrect. The cheek of him to question his manager - he should be left to rot on the bench for the rest of the year!

One striker rotting on the bench is enough.
"When it's too tough for them, it's just right for us"

brokencrossbar1

#8118
January 14, 2009, 09:51:46 AM
Quote from: pintsofguinness on January 13, 2009, 07:24:51 PM
Rumour has it over here that there's video evidence Gerrard went over to yer man in the bar, hit him knocking him down, started to kick him when he was on the ground.  Gerrard's mates waded in and he went away and came back with a bottle and threw it at the boy on the ground.

Bad if that's true but could be bullshit.

If this is what actually happened I can guarantee that Gerard would not have been charged with a s47 assault.  The way things work is that the police charge with with the highest offence that they can as a holding charge and then when the case is being set for trial, the actual charges that the defendant will be facing will be put to him.  A s47 assault is the next step up from common assault which is the lowest level of assault charge available.  If there was CCTV evidence of Gerard doing this, and there was evidence that the complainant had injuries, which there is, then he would have been charged with a minimum s 20 assault for GBH, or possibly a s 18 GBH with intent, as he went back and threw a bottle at him. 

Billys Boots

#8119
January 14, 2009, 10:01:19 AM
What's the likely penalty if he's found guilty as charged bc?
My hands are stained with thistle milk ...

Hound

#8120
January 14, 2009, 10:10:20 AM
I heard there was CCTV. I would expect there to be CCTV is such a place, and if there wasnt I would have expected Liverpool to pay off the victim to make it go away (which they couldnt do if there was CCTV evidence).

But I dont believe its near as bad as said above, otherwise surely he would have been charged with assault rather than affray.

brokencrossbar1

#8121
January 14, 2009, 10:25:43 AM
Quote from: Billys Boots on January 14, 2009, 10:01:19 AM
What's the likely penalty if he's found guilty as charged bc?

If it was in the north and he was convicted of s47, with no record, there would be community service or possibly a short suspended sentence.  The likelihood is that it would be a community service type penalty with a compensation payment to the victim.

EC Unique

#8122
January 14, 2009, 11:34:18 AM
If he is found guilty do you think the FA will act and if so what is likely?

brokencrossbar1

#8123
January 14, 2009, 11:40:22 AM
I wouldn't think so, it is not football related.  They didn't get involved in Joey Barton's case involving the assault in Liverpool, but they did suspend him over whacking his team mate.  The FA would have no grounds to get involved officially, but unofficially he might never get the England captain's armband again of convicted.

Minder

#8125
January 15, 2009, 02:14:36 PM
"When it's too tough for them, it's just right for us"

Norf Tyrone

#8126
January 15, 2009, 02:29:45 PM
Quote from: Hound on January 14, 2009, 10:10:20 AM
I heard there was CCTV. I would expect there to be CCTV is such a place, and if there wasnt I would have expected Liverpool to pay off the victim to make it go away (which they couldnt do if there was CCTV evidence).

But I dont believe its near as bad as said above, otherwise surely he would have been charged with assault rather than affray.


There was CCTV in the Terry/Morris/ Byrne case that showed that Terry was innocent but he still was taken to court.

QuoteI wouldn't think so, it is not football related.  They didn't get involved in Joey Barton's case involving the assault in Liverpool, but they did suspend him over whacking his team mate.  The FA would have no grounds to get involved officially, but unofficially he might never get the England captain's armband again of convicted.

The FA have banned players while charged in the past... why not again?
Owen Roe O'Neills GAC, Leckpatrick, Tyrone

isourboydownyet

#8127
January 15, 2009, 02:46:16 PM
Quote from: pintsofguinness on January 13, 2009, 07:24:51 PM
Rumour has it over here that there's video evidence Gerrard went over to yer man in the bar, hit him knocking him down, started to kick him when he was on the ground.  Gerrard's mates waded in and he went away and came back with a bottle and threw it at the boy on the ground.

Bad if that's true but could be bullshit.

this is totally untrue,of the offences committed Gerrard was minimal.i know your going to ask me how i know,just trust me i know.

new devil

#8128
January 15, 2009, 02:48:31 PM
How do you know  ::) ::)

Minder

#8129
January 15, 2009, 02:52:43 PM
"When it's too tough for them, it's just right for us"
Print
Go Up Pages 1 ... 540 541 542 543 544 ... 616
User actions