Wasn't there a loyalist hunger strike?.......think it lasted until lunch time
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Show posts MenuQuote from: Nally Stand on October 01, 2013, 12:35:56 PMQuote from: Count 10 on October 01, 2013, 12:07:57 PMSeems to me that your problem isn't so much stormont, as it is those who vote. The power sharing arrangements at stormont are what the vast majority of people in Ireland voted for in 1998 and those sitting in it under those terms are those who were voted in to do so. It ain't perfect but that's how it goes. As far as I'm concerned therefor, if you don't vote, you lose the right to complain.
Stormont is a sick joke....jobs for the boys...that's all it is....nice we carve up.....in the full knowledge that people will continue to vote along tribal lines come election time... That's why my electoral papers helped light the fireQuote from: Count 10 on October 01, 2013, 12:07:57 PM
Peter Robinson's rant the other day was like something out of Fawlty Towers....but the really sad part is that no one from the Nationalist side challenged him.....now imagine if David Cameron stood up in the house of commons and berated Milliband for selling land to "niggers".....outcry...you can bet your life on it.....but in this cesspit we call home don't rock the boat
"During Question Time today Peter Robinson, in response to Jim Allister, rounded on the TUV MLA asking him to explain how "secretly, and outside of the House, the Member, as the executor of a will, is selling land to republicans in County Fermanagh to benefit his own family." I don't know if these allegations are true or not but such comments were wholly unacceptable for the First Minster to make. This is an office that is designed to represent everyone. However the tone of Peter Robinsons remarks are essentially a signal that it is not OK to sell land to Catholics. Peter Robinson needs to explain his comments. If this is the focus of Unionists to score points over one another it is clearly espousing a sectarian agenda." Sean Lynch MLA
Quote from: Gabriel_Hurl on September 30, 2013, 03:50:31 PM
Slightly farther afield - Eagle Ridge GC just outside of Toronto
Quote from: Eamonnca1 on September 21, 2013, 04:01:43 AM
Okay, here's the video. This won't play on mobile platforms, this is expected. In the coming weeks there'll be an extended edition with more footage and interviews, and it will play on mobile devices. In the meantime, turn up the volume, sit back and enjoy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OHI9PRMOS-o
Quote from: Orior on September 19, 2013, 10:02:18 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 06:19:43 PM
We have all had bad days on the course....Italian Open...fair play to him for returning his card...mine would have been in nearest bin
145 STUMPO (AM), Chad* +22 18 +22 94 - - - 94
Chad Stumpo (is that his real name?) was playing with David Dixon +3, and Mikael Lundberg +5
Afterwards in an interview with Sky Sports, David and Mikael said "Jeez, it was like playing with Jim Stynes"
Quote from: Mike Sheehy on September 20, 2013, 01:12:10 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 03:21:02 AMQuote from: theskull1 on September 18, 2013, 11:47:34 PM
Youve pretty much captured his argumentation technique.
Problem is he believes everything he thinks you've said so ...the mans impossible to converse with.
An asshole
I will allow you one chance to retract that statement
Quote from: Mike Sheehy on September 20, 2013, 09:05:15 AMQuote from: Count 10 on September 20, 2013, 07:46:38 AMQuote from: Mike Sheehy on September 19, 2013, 09:43:13 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: Mike Sheehy on September 19, 2013, 12:54:28 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 03:21:02 AMQuote from: theskull1 on September 18, 2013, 11:47:34 PM
Youve pretty much captured his argumentation technique.
Problem is he believes everything he thinks you've said so ...the mans impossible to converse with.
An asshole
I can see why you resort to these petty insults. Your lightweight intellect prevents you from adding anything of substance to the debate .
Tell me does the sanctimonious shite you spout smell?
You would know more about fish suppers!
The grown ups are making some progress now so you really should f*k off as you add nothing. I don't think you have made a contribution of any substance.
As I said you would know more about fish suppers
Saw this and thought of you Sheehy.....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILKf3DGv0oc
Not surprising you have a thing against guards given that you are provo scum.
btw, forgot to ask you, what were you doing in Riyadh during gulf war 1 ?
Quote from: Mike Sheehy on September 19, 2013, 09:43:13 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: Mike Sheehy on September 19, 2013, 12:54:28 PMQuote from: Count 10 on September 19, 2013, 03:21:02 AMQuote from: theskull1 on September 18, 2013, 11:47:34 PM
Youve pretty much captured his argumentation technique.
Problem is he believes everything he thinks you've said so ...the mans impossible to converse with.
An asshole
I can see why you resort to these petty insults. Your lightweight intellect prevents you from adding anything of substance to the debate .
Tell me does the sanctimonious shite you spout smell?
You would know more about fish suppers!
The grown ups are making some progress now so you really should f*k off as you add nothing. I don't think you have made a contribution of any substance.