Astounded this isn't major news, but Nasa are sending humans into lunar orbit in a few weeks for the first time in 50 years. Suppose it isn't clicky ragebait so doesnt generate ad revenue.
If all goes well with this mission, Artemis 3 will bring humans back to the lunar surface in around 2028.
Who's directing it ;D
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on January 12, 2026, 07:10:02 PMWho's directing it ;D
Just realising what the Internet is gonna be like when they do walk on the moon again 😫😫😫
Do they need any teachers on the moon?
Quote from: Look-Up! on January 12, 2026, 09:54:43 PMDo they need any teachers on the moon?
Would they be allowed to still only work a 9am-2pm working day?
Planning permission for an Irish Pub?
An Gealach Gael?
Imagine having to go and test it out, because they've conveniently lost the technology and knowledge to land on the moon again just yet.
Quote from: lurganblue on January 13, 2026, 08:24:08 AMImagine having to go and test it out, because they've conveniently lost the technology and knowledge to land on the moon again just yet.
Maybe they would have stayed had there been oil up there
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on January 13, 2026, 08:33:16 AMQuote from: lurganblue on January 13, 2026, 08:24:08 AMImagine having to go and test it out, because they've conveniently lost the technology and knowledge to land on the moon again just yet.
Maybe they would have stayed had there been oil up there
Maybe they've found evidence of some and that's why they're heading back
Quote from: Armagh18 on January 13, 2026, 08:37:41 AMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on January 13, 2026, 08:33:16 AMQuote from: lurganblue on January 13, 2026, 08:24:08 AMImagine having to go and test it out, because they've conveniently lost the technology and knowledge to land on the moon again just yet.
Maybe they would have stayed had there been oil up there
Maybe they've found evidence of some and that's why they're heading back
I can't imagine there is anything up there, a possible vanity project but wasting that amount of money to go on to a rock was one of the reasons the missions were cancelled (or filming was stopped, depending on your view)
Quote from: Milltown Row2 on January 13, 2026, 08:40:23 AMQuote from: Armagh18 on January 13, 2026, 08:37:41 AMQuote from: Milltown Row2 on January 13, 2026, 08:33:16 AMQuote from: lurganblue on January 13, 2026, 08:24:08 AMImagine having to go and test it out, because they've conveniently lost the technology and knowledge to land on the moon again just yet.
Maybe they would have stayed had there been oil up there
Maybe they've found evidence of some and that's why they're heading back
I can't imagine there is anything up there, a possible vanity project but wasting that amount of money to go on to a rock was one of the reasons the missions were cancelled (or filming was stopped, depending on your view)
What happened to Musk and his Mars project? Be great if he could get and take a pile of his mates with him for a decade or 4
Isn't using the moon as a staging post part of the long term Mars plan.
Quote from: bennydorano on January 13, 2026, 09:25:39 AMIsn't using the moon as a staging post part of the long term Mars plan.
Yes, that is what I thought the whole point of Artemis is. A test and practice project to see if a manned Mars mission could be feasible.