Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - stiff breeze

#256
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 02:05:17 PM
This clown stiff breeze is f**king priceless
He says "Dirk is a legend" then in the next post says he hopes he will become a legend, rather than believs he is a legend..............

I hate having to constantly show your stupidity. I said noting like what you wrote. I said I THINK dirk kuyt is a legend and then I said I HOPE he proves people wrong next season. Is that simple enough for you
#257
Quote from: AFS on May 06, 2008, 02:02:32 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:51:29 PM
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on May 06, 2008, 01:34:14 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:07:49 PM

liverpool only spent 30 million this season and that includes buying torres babel and mascherano. so did they spend 120 in the other 2? I dont think so. do your research


Torres 20 milllion
Babbel 11 million
Mascherano £18.6 million


Total £49.6 million

Is that not more than £30 million? do (sic) your research

players out of liverpool this year.

Luis Garcia
Atlético Madrid
£3,500,000

Djibril Cisse
Marseille
£6,000,000

Florent Sinama Pongolle
Recreativo Huelva
£2,700,000

Craig Bellamy
West Ham United
£7,500,000

momo sissoko
juventus
8 million

thats 28 million recovered

and all together we spent 62million minus the money from players sold  therefore spending 34 million . now jog on

So their net outlay was £30 million but they still spent in excess of £50 million on those 3 players. Yours is a David O'Learyesque argument.

when you compare that with chelseas and united its nowhere near,
#258
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 01:42:51 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:21:28 PM
Quote from: AZOffaly on May 06, 2008, 01:18:04 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 12:59:30 PM
Thought you wanted Kuyt there?

I would have kuyt there but if we could afford a top winger, which i doubt, then kuyt would be a good squad player to have.

If Dirk Kuyt starts more than 20 games in the league for Liverpool next season, LFC will NOT win the league, or come close.

dirk is a legend. I think he will prove alot of people wrong next season.

Oh FFS
Please tell me you are taking the p1ss

Im not but am perhaps hoping it will happen rather than believing it.
#259
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on May 06, 2008, 01:34:14 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:07:49 PM

liverpool only spent 30 million this season and that includes buying torres babel and mascherano. so did they spend 120 in the other 2? I dont think so. do your research


Torres 20 milllion
Babbel 11 million
Mascherano £18.6 million


Total £49.6 million

Is that not more than £30 million? do (sic) your research

players out of liverpool this year.

Luis Garcia
Atlético Madrid
£3,500,000

Djibril Cisse
Marseille
£6,000,000

Florent Sinama Pongolle
Recreativo Huelva
£2,700,000

Craig Bellamy
West Ham United
£7,500,000

momo sissoko
juventus
8 million

thats 28 million recovered

and all together we spent 62million minus the money from players sold  therefore spending 34 million . now jog on
#260
Quote from: AZOffaly on May 06, 2008, 01:23:41 PM
Kuyt tries like a hoor, is as game as they come, but he has a first touch not seen since Genghis Khan, and passes the ball with the accuracy of Helen Keller. He does some great things, mostly defensively, and has popped up with a few important goals, but he is, or should be, a squad player at a team looking to win league titles.

cant arguE with most of that except for the touch , brilliant player at controling a ball in the air and bringin it to ground. He has had a bad season no doubt but things have gone the wrong way for him , he could have had a hat-trick against city on sunday except for top goal keeping , the bar and a deflection. When them things go wrong its hard to perform at the top of your game but hopefully the time of this summer will get his head sorted. Time will tell.
#261
Armagh / Re: Armagh Club football & hurling
May 06, 2008, 01:24:35 PM
Quote from: Real1995 on May 06, 2008, 10:04:39 AM
Well i dont see why i should lie either?? ??? I saw no Mullaghbawn supporters on the pitch! At the end of the day i was at the game and i witnessed it with my own two eyes and i aint depending on a second rate story from someone else... Anyway the two teams had a bit of a fight...if u were at the game you would have seen that there was no bad blood at final whistle..  we are big boys here goats...what happens on the field stays on the field and thats the way it dis

I love it when armagh players fight each other. It should be made in2 a sport
#262
Quote from: AZOffaly on May 06, 2008, 01:18:04 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 01:09:55 PM
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 12:59:30 PM
Thought you wanted Kuyt there?

I would have kuyt there but if we could afford a top winger, which i doubt, then kuyt would be a good squad player to have.

If Dirk Kuyt starts more than 20 games in the league for Liverpool next season, LFC will NOT win the league, or come close.

dirk is a legend. I think he will prove alot of people wrong next season.
#263
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 12:59:30 PM
Thought you wanted Kuyt there?

I would have kuyt there but if we could afford a top winger, which i doubt, then kuyt would be a good squad player to have.
#264
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on May 06, 2008, 01:00:46 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 12:55:09 PM
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on May 06, 2008, 12:49:49 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Uladh on May 06, 2008, 12:34:01 PM
United currently have Brown, neville, scholes, fletcher and giggs in the squad who they never paid a bean for. how many have arsenal?

your away of the point i said i didnt want to buy the title like chelsea did. united brought youth ten years ago and won it and fair play to them , they dont seem to develop as much now because they can afford big names. arsenal are doin wat united did and i would like to see liverpool do the same rather than have a quick fix

Too late....how much has Rafa spent? Torres, Mascherano, Alonso.

you have to be jokin me. Not even gonna have this arguement with you because if I dig up the spending figures for the past 3 seasons you will look very stupid.


No I won't. You said you did not want to buy the league, and my retort suggests that Rafa has not exactly been left with a meagre budget these last few years. I'd say he has spent 100-150 million over the last few seasons.

liverpool only spent 30 million this season and that includes buying torres babel and mascherano. so did they spend 120 in the other 2? I dont think so. do your research
#265
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 12:49:59 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Uladh on May 06, 2008, 12:34:01 PM
United currently have Brown, neville, scholes, fletcher and giggs in the squad who they never paid a bean for. how many have arsenal?

your away of the point i said i didnt want to buy the title like chelsea did. united brought youth ten years ago and won it and fair play to them , they dont seem to develop as much now because they can afford big names. arsenal are doin wat united did and i would like to see liverpool do the same rather than have a quick fix

If the pool continue the way they are going they will not be challenging for the PL in the near future.
Even if they decide to bring talent through the ranks, do you really think they will reap the rewards by challenging for the title next year?

Incidentally, you seem to think that all the pool have to do is add Barry for next season :D :D

barry and perhaps another winger of bentleys pedigree and if we play insua at LB
#266
Quote from: Norf Tyrone on May 06, 2008, 12:49:49 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 12:43:54 PM
Quote from: Uladh on May 06, 2008, 12:34:01 PM
United currently have Brown, neville, scholes, fletcher and giggs in the squad who they never paid a bean for. how many have arsenal?

your away of the point i said i didnt want to buy the title like chelsea did. united brought youth ten years ago and won it and fair play to them , they dont seem to develop as much now because they can afford big names. arsenal are doin wat united did and i would like to see liverpool do the same rather than have a quick fix

Too late....how much has Rafa spent? Torres, Mascherano, Alonso.

you have to be jokin me. Not even gonna have this arguement with you because if I dig up the spending figures for the past 3 seasons you will look very stupid.
#267
General discussion / Re: Official Gooners Thread
May 06, 2008, 12:46:27 PM
Quote from: Dinny Breen on May 06, 2008, 12:44:04 PM
Quotehe is still the best LB in england though I hate to say it.

Not a chance Clichy or Evra any day...

sorry mate put that the wrong way , he is the best english LB in the country. Clichy is on a par with nhim though evra the hateful tr**p is the best in the prem IMO. watch out for Insua from LFC, lad is a talent
#268
Quote from: Uladh on May 06, 2008, 12:34:01 PM
United currently have Brown, neville, scholes, fletcher and giggs in the squad who they never paid a bean for. how many have arsenal?

your away of the point i said i didnt want to buy the title like chelsea did. united brought youth ten years ago and won it and fair play to them , they dont seem to develop as much now because they can afford big names. arsenal are doin wat united did and i would like to see liverpool do the same rather than have a quick fix
#269
Quote from: AFS on May 06, 2008, 12:32:51 PM
Quote from: Dinny Breen on May 06, 2008, 12:28:50 PM
QuoteThats a myth. Arsenal have bought nearly every player they have

They buy them young and develop them, suibtle difference between that and spending 16m plus on squad players like Hargreaves, Carrick or Nani. When was the last time Man U actually developed a player, Wes Brown???

Fletcher, Pique, O'Shea. And arguably Rooney and Ronaldo, both of whom came to the club before they turned 18. Most of Arsenal's young talent has also been bought when they were around 17/18.

your missing the point we are talking about developing talent. Fletcher and o shea are not in that bracket and pique is unproven. WE are also talking about devolping talent cheaply and rooney and ronaldo dont come in2 that bracket either.
#270
Quote from: full back on May 06, 2008, 12:33:56 PM
Quote from: stiff breeze on May 06, 2008, 12:30:29 PM
Quote from: Dinny Breen on May 06, 2008, 12:28:50 PM
QuoteThats a myth. Arsenal have bought nearly every player they have

They buy them young and develop them, suibtle difference between that and spending 16m plus on squad players like Hargreaves, Carrick or Nani. When was the last time Man U actually developed a player, Wes Brown???

ha ha and wat a development he is

He would make the scousers team ;)

after we get rid of riise there will be no more gingers in an LFC jersey!! lol they are a disaster