Quote from: Tony Baloney on April 02, 2018, 04:17:58 PMQuote from: ONeill on April 02, 2018, 04:09:11 PMI think it's a 1 day ban for admitting you are wrong. Nobody has even been banned.Quote from: caprea on April 01, 2018, 03:40:14 PMQuote from: David McKeown on April 01, 2018, 03:30:20 PMQuote from: caprea on April 01, 2018, 03:15:21 PMQuote from: David McKeown on April 01, 2018, 02:38:52 PM
Capera
What exactly was the judiciary supposed to do about the vaginal charge for Olding? How was it sloppy work?
Drop the charge I would have thought. It really depends how late they knew they wouldn't be presenting a case to prosecute it no?
Since writing the blog I think what happened is the girl wasn't sure if Olding had vaginal sex with her. She said she was face down so couldn't be sure.
Guess it depends on the timeline of finding that out.
But that's nothing to do with the judiciary. The decision of what charges to bring is the sole preserve of the PPS. Once Olding entered a not guilty plea to the charge at arraignment (and I imagine there must have been some evidence to ground that charge at that stage) the only way it could have played out is exactly how it did.
Of course. I'm wrong.
WTF? You know how the gaaboard works?
10plus years ive been comin here. First time.
Poster of the year fo sho'