Quote from: johnnycool on Today at 05:16:34 PMQuote from: greatpoint on Today at 04:53:19 PMQuote from: johnnycool on Today at 04:18:02 PMQuote from: Snapchap on Today at 03:44:55 PMQuote from: armaghniac on Today at 03:30:49 PMQuote from: Snapchap on May 21, 2024, 04:59:26 PMQuote from: armaghniac on May 21, 2024, 02:55:41 PMQuote from: johnnycool on May 21, 2024, 10:38:52 AMWestern standards laid bare for all to see:
I'm not sure the term "Western" is appropriate, every west European country and Canada, Australia and New Zealand support the ICC.
The USA don't.
Then the post should have referred to the USA and not to "Western".
While your post shouldn't have made the claim that "every western country" supports the ICC.
The point I was making is that the "western" world were up and arms and rightly so when Russia invaded Ukraine, sanctions, diplomats getting banned etc etc, but when Israel starts slaughtering the Palestinians on a scale that would make Pol Pot blush, there's none of the same concern.
Is there any nuance at all between the two conflicts or do you reckon they're directly comparable?
The direct comparison is that innocent women and children are being killed in both.
what other nuance do you need?
So given that innocent women and children were killed in the Second World War, it must therefore be directly comparable to the conflict in Gaza?
Can you see the drawbacks of using this kind of reasoning?