Quote from: gallsman on May 14, 2026, 01:30:07 PMQuote from: PadraicHenryPearse on May 14, 2026, 12:54:07 PMQuote from: gallsman on May 14, 2026, 12:34:00 PMQuote from: johnnycool on May 14, 2026, 12:12:36 PMyou have to be persecuting Semites before you can be called an anti-semite.
Ashkenazi's aren't semites but you knew that anyway.
Is there any particular reason to be this f**king pedantic?
Antisemitism is widely understood (dare I say largely accepted, even on this board) to refer to discrimination against/persecution of Jews. Jews are not a homogenously ethnic group.
Nobody, unless they are deliberately going out of their way to be obtuse, considers antisemitism to be an attack on, say, Levantine Christians. You have to resort to your good old-fashioned racism for that.
do you accept the ihra definition?
Whether I do or I don't (I don't) is completely irrelevant to whether anyone with half a functioning brain cell (a high bar on the board, I know) understands that antisemitism = anti-Jew.
The problem with the IHRA definition (as you well know) is that it clearly tries to label actions or beliefs that aren't necessarily anti-Jew as such.
Do you understand the difference?
You made the claim that antisemitism is widely understood. It isn't as you pointed out some issues with IHRA definition and if that is how someone determines antisemitism then it isn't just about being anti-Jew.
in my experience it is typically zionists (jewish or otherwise) that cast a wide net of what is and isn't antisemitism beyond what 'anyone with a half functioning brain' would consider antisemitism. Greta was anti semtic for have a blue octopus Teddy in a picture.
some on here considered the renaming of a park antisemitic....