Quote from: Milltown Row2 on March 16, 2018, 09:02:08 AMQuote from: seafoid on March 16, 2018, 08:04:32 AM
Jackson insisted no vanilla sex but the witness saw him in position
He had no explanation for the tear in the vaginal wall. The claimant did . The whole hand.
Olding and McIlroy had the same story.
Olding was accused of exposure but he said he had oral sex with her. He must be lying.
The 3 insisted the claimant was fine leaving.
This was contradicted by the claimant and Harrison's texts
Harrison denied the meaning of the key texts. This was not credible.
The defence position is essentially that the claimant is a nymphomaniac.
You have missed your calling! instead of saving the world from economy disasters you should joing forces with Syferus and become the next legal team from the West!
IP took her own top off.
she was all over Jackson at the bar and his house
she said she never knew who he was
Left her mates and went back to a party with no friends
made no attempt to ask for help when the witness came in
witness seen her give oral with no hands on her
She was not sober, neither was anyone
No previous from the defendants
No of the above mean shit if she said no at any time, which would mean rape, the only no that was heard was when the other guy came in and she said, not him as well!
Too many factors there for 10 or more of the jury to say guilty i think, not that it makes them totaly innocent
Allegedly CCT footage from Ollies shows her talking to a doctor most of the night, not any of the NI team or Jackson and Co.
No previous,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,hmmmmmmmmm