Quote from: Armagh18 on Today at 08:35:03 AMKildare have the ability to beat Westmeath but don't think they will. Still that flakiness or something with Kildare despite having talent. Westmeath have very good forwards, Luke Loughlin wouldn't look out of place probably on any team in the country, always that bit of doggedness in them too, gave us a big scare in Armagh in 2023 and weren't miles away in 2024, caused the other teams in the groups trouble as well as far as I remember .
Quote from: 2ndstringsub on Today at 10:06:20 AMThere is the potential for that but overall grade size would need reduced to 12 or split to two sections of 8 teams. 30 league game is not sustainable and pitches don't allow for a start before April.Quote from: square_ball on April 19, 2026, 12:20:31 PMQuote from: Goals_Will_Come on April 17, 2026, 12:32:51 PMQuote from: O'neill Army on April 17, 2026, 07:39:03 AMThe problem with that rule change is the effect it is has on when you play teams.Quote from: Mikhailov on April 12, 2026, 12:36:56 AMAre these fixtures confirmed? Are they all Starred fixtures....?
Few senior clubs with county men have got the raw end of the deal if these fixtures are confirmed....
Fianna with 4 county men play Clonoe & Ardboe who have none plus Killyclogher who have 1 - hardly fair
Edendork (4 men) play Ardboe & Moortown with no men plus Carmen with 1 man - again very unfair
Eglish (3 men) play Galbally & Clonoe who both have none - not fair either
Donaghmore (4 men) play Galbally with none, Clarkes with 1 and Killyclogher with 1 - unfair again
Lough (4 men) play Clonoe with none and Dromore with 1 - again unfair
Surely there is a cluster of teams with 3+ county men - is the obvious thing not to have them all play each other for the starred game system.
There must be a reasonable explanation for these games above but I simply can't see how it is fair.
Teams getting punished for having county men is not fair
Clubs that have more county players than other clubs have always had that disadvantage which is why the county board have brought in the new rule this season that a win in a starred game is worth 2 points but a win in a non starred game is worth 3 points.
Surely that seems fair?
For example in Senior Clonoe play Moortown for 2 points but Coalisland play them later for 3 points. That point could make the difference in the relegation picture come the end of the season.
Only way that 2/3 point system works really is if everyone plays each other home and away.
Maybe I'm a glutton for punishment but I would love to have home and away fixtures at the top grades. seemed to work for division 3 a & b last year.
lads end up training from before Christmas anyway so why not start the games in February and get 6 months of good football in instead of training for longer than most seasons last.
16 league games from 1st February till now would have you playing until the end of may which is when we aim to start our games anyway as long as the u20's are successful.
take a break between 1st set and 2nd set of games. 2-3 weeks.
reserve games would be as they are now in my opinion with only home/away fixtures played not both.(these would be played in the 2nd set of fixtures from may onwards)
would help bleed players into senior teams around the county but still guarantees football for those lads that are past it or a bit green for senior football.
you can talk about player welfare etc and those are all valid points but ask any player in the country would they rather be dragged to donegal for a friendly or a run up some god forsaken mountain... any of them would take the game that means something.
Quote from: square_ball on April 19, 2026, 12:20:31 PMQuote from: Goals_Will_Come on April 17, 2026, 12:32:51 PMQuote from: O'neill Army on April 17, 2026, 07:39:03 AMThe problem with that rule change is the effect it is has on when you play teams.Quote from: Mikhailov on April 12, 2026, 12:36:56 AMAre these fixtures confirmed? Are they all Starred fixtures....?
Few senior clubs with county men have got the raw end of the deal if these fixtures are confirmed....
Fianna with 4 county men play Clonoe & Ardboe who have none plus Killyclogher who have 1 - hardly fair
Edendork (4 men) play Ardboe & Moortown with no men plus Carmen with 1 man - again very unfair
Eglish (3 men) play Galbally & Clonoe who both have none - not fair either
Donaghmore (4 men) play Galbally with none, Clarkes with 1 and Killyclogher with 1 - unfair again
Lough (4 men) play Clonoe with none and Dromore with 1 - again unfair
Surely there is a cluster of teams with 3+ county men - is the obvious thing not to have them all play each other for the starred game system.
There must be a reasonable explanation for these games above but I simply can't see how it is fair.
Teams getting punished for having county men is not fair
Clubs that have more county players than other clubs have always had that disadvantage which is why the county board have brought in the new rule this season that a win in a starred game is worth 2 points but a win in a non starred game is worth 3 points.
Surely that seems fair?
For example in Senior Clonoe play Moortown for 2 points but Coalisland play them later for 3 points. That point could make the difference in the relegation picture come the end of the season.
Only way that 2/3 point system works really is if everyone plays each other home and away.