Messages

No kneecap can shout "up Hamas" at a concert, and most posters on here conveniently ignore the fact that Hamas actually murdered hundreds of concert goers on October 7th

Actually its borderline comical levels of hypocrisy and double standards on here

Not alone did no-one call for them to apologize, people like me who pointed it out were accused of engaging in a witch hunt

I vote that Tipperary should be banned from singing the Galtee Mountain Boy on the steps of the Hogan Stand next time they win the Liam McCarthy Cup

https://youtu.be/WjxUkPDZ7WA?si=twTT7ItlUlmUhGZX

It idolizes a man who was actually a staunch Nazi supporter

Trope yer hole. It's literally renaming a park because of what Israel are currently at, it's nothing to do with the actual person or his actions. its a pathetic, impotent lash out.

So
Following that logic every Stadium and team named after an Irish Republican should be renamed for good
Measure

Makes sense

Just watched The Truth v Alex Jones. Mad to think that 75 million people in the US believed that Sandy Hook was possibly faked. These people have a vote and can literally be fed any type of shite.

Where do get the 75m figure from?

In the court case, when lawyer is explaining to jury the level of influence Jones had/has and the commercial power and revenue base he has for hawking all his snake oil products, he states that 24% of Americans believe Sandy Hook was either definitely or possibly staged. Doesn't explain where he got his data from but it was in a court of law and the numbers weren't challenged from Jones's team and the final settlement was huge based on his earning potential, so can only assume it's not far off.

Makes perfect sense to include newborns, preschoolers and the criminally insane in the calculation

Whatever you think

Who said they were included? Where did you get that from?

You did

You said 24 % of Americans (75M people) believed it was a hoax

Read my post again. This is the evidence gave to the jury in the Jones case. Never said it was fact, just no one disputed it. So where are you getting your "info" from?

FFS-LOL

"Never said it was fact"

I've heard it all now

Theres a decent percentage of Americans who think they'd beat a grizzly bear in a fight so who knows..

That doesn't surprise me

There was a famous football coach Bear Bryant who supposedly wrestled a bear at a carnival

In outdoors stores they sell "bear spray" with big warnings not to intentionally initiate contact with bears

Just watched The Truth v Alex Jones. Mad to think that 75 million people in the US believed that Sandy Hook was possibly faked. These people have a vote and can literally be fed any type of shite.

Where do get the 75m figure from?

In the court case, when lawyer is explaining to jury the level of influence Jones had/has and the commercial power and revenue base he has for hawking all his snake oil products, he states that 24% of Americans believe Sandy Hook was either definitely or possibly staged. Doesn't explain where he got his data from but it was in a court of law and the numbers weren't challenged from Jones's team and the final settlement was huge based on his earning potential, so can only assume it's not far off.

Makes perfect sense to include newborns, preschoolers and the criminally insane in the calculation

Whatever you think

Who said they were included? Where did you get that from?

You did

You said 24 % of Americans (75M people) believed it was a hoax

Did they poll newborns preschoolers and criminally insane?

Based on the numbers he is posting it would appear so

(The actual numbers I think he's referring to are the from the following article, But it's not 75,000,000 people believing it's was some type of hoax

https://michiganadvance.com/2023/01/03/a-decade-after-sandy-hook-conspiracy-theories-still-plague-the-culture-opinion/

" Six months later, as gun control legislation stalled in Congress, a university poll found 1 in 4 people thought the truth about Sandy Hook was being hidden to advance a political agenda")

Just watched The Truth v Alex Jones. Mad to think that 75 million people in the US believed that Sandy Hook was possibly faked. These people have a vote and can literally be fed any type of shite.

Where do get the 75m figure from?

In the court case, when lawyer is explaining to jury the level of influence Jones had/has and the commercial power and revenue base he has for hawking all his snake oil products, he states that 24% of Americans believe Sandy Hook was either definitely or possibly staged. Doesn't explain where he got his data from but it was in a court of law and the numbers weren't challenged from Jones's team and the final settlement was huge based on his earning potential, so can only assume it's not far off.

Makes perfect sense to include newborns, preschoolers and the criminally insane in the calculation

Whatever you think

Who said they were included? Where did you get that from?

You did

You said 24 % of Americans (75M people) believed it was a hoax

Just watched The Truth v Alex Jones. Mad to think that 75 million people in the US believed that Sandy Hook was possibly faked. These people have a vote and can literally be fed any type of shite.

Where do get the 75m figure from?

In the court case, when lawyer is explaining to jury the level of influence Jones had/has and the commercial power and revenue base he has for hawking all his snake oil products, he states that 24% of Americans believe Sandy Hook was either definitely or possibly staged. Doesn't explain where he got his data from but it was in a court of law and the numbers weren't challenged from Jones's team and the final settlement was huge based on his earning potential, so can only assume it's not far off.

Makes perfect sense to include newborns, preschoolers and the criminally insane in the calculation

Whatever you think

You are absolutely proud of your ignorance- pointedly refusing to research the case.

You aren't on the level, I'm out.

https://youtu.be/XVT81UB-o-k

5:45 presenter reading from the CAB report

Lists all the people who were in the garden when the shooting occurred then goes on to say

"All these persons are suspected of involvement in criminality and are close associates of the Price/McGuire Organised Crime Gang"

Jesus man! Catch a f**king grip! You're the most useless Cnut I know..

That other poster claimed that the EX Director of the IPAS Center was merely mentioned in the CAB report as "a witness to a shooting". They categorically denied the CAB report mentioned the person having any links to criminality-WRONG


(He also denied that 2 Sinn Fein TDs referred to the person as a gangster and a criminal-WRONG ALSO)

(He also denied that the person in question had any criminal convictions—WRING AGAIN)

Don't know why you're getting mad at me. Im just pointing out things that 2 Sinn Fein TDS and the author of a CAB report had to say on the person in question

You are absolutely proud of your ignorance- pointedly refusing to research the case.

You aren't on the level, I'm out.

https://youtu.be/XVT81UB-o-k

5:45 presenter reading from the CAB report

Lists all the people who were in the garden when the shooting occurred then goes on to say

"All these persons are suspected of involvement in criminality and are close associates of the Price/McGuire Organised Crime Gang"

And around we go.

He doesn't own the company. You admitted that yourself.

CAB didn't 'link him' to anything. He was listed as one of a dozen witnesses to a shooting. And the Sunday World didn't claim that.

Did you even read the Sunday World article?


Again, you are allowed think for yourself. But you have accepted a far right talking point, the centers are criminal enterprises, and worked back using falsehoods.

He was a director of the company when they won the contract and "stepped back" when it became public

I watched a Sunday World video clip and (I'm going from memory here)-he and others with him were described as known criminals with close links to Cornelius Price

Yesterday you were claiming that no one called him a gangster and a criminal-that was a lie

Yesterday you claimed he had never been convicted of anything-and that was a lie

And you're lying again here trying to prop up a false narrative

He stepped away in July. He never owned the company. So false.

No he wasn't. Your memory is false.

Accepted, but the Dail language is all alledged. They didn't outright say it, but yes, they alluded to it.

He hasn't yet been convicted of the motoring offence. He pled guilty, yes, but there is no guarantees on sentence. He might get a slap on the wrist for a first offence.

So you haven't read the newspaper report, and certainly haven't read the CAB piece. But you rumble on.

I'm out. You are closing a false narrative to justify your prejudices. Facts won't change that.

Violent disorder is a now a motoring offense

Here's what Matt Carty said-

"In July I raised concerns about Secure Accommodation Limited and how we could have IPAS accommodation being provided by a company where a person who had been a director was linked to gangland criminality.  This followed reports in the Sunday World that the government had paid millions for IPAS accommodation to a company owned by a man who the Criminal Assets Bureau had linked to the Drogheda gang feud."



But as I always say-believe whatever you want

And around we go.

He doesn't own the company. You admitted that yourself.

CAB didn't 'link him' to anything. He was listed as one of a dozen witnesses to a shooting. And the Sunday World didn't claim that.

Did you even read the Sunday World article?


Again, you are allowed think for yourself. But you have accepted a far right talking point, the centers are criminal enterprises, and worked back using falsehoods.

He was a director of the company when they won the contract and "stepped back" when it became public

I watched a Sunday World video clip and (I'm going from memory here)-he and others with him were described as known criminals with close links to Cornelius Price

Yesterday you were claiming that no one called him a gangster and a criminal-that was a lie

Yesterday you claimed he had never been convicted of anything-and that was a lie

And you're lying again here trying to prop up a false narrative

[2. This is entirely false.]

He might get the probation act. This is getting demeaning now. What a wierd hill to die on.

Not weird at all

2 reasons why it's important

(1) The setting of the fire at the IPAS Center was down to a dispute between 2 criminal gangs not some "far right" ideology.

(2) Gangsters/convicted criminals were able to pass the vetting required to run an IPAS center where they received €10 M in taxpayer funded reimbursement.

If the government can't vet Irish people to run an IPAS center how the heck can we trust them to vet the incoming asylum seekers/refugees

1. If you have information on the arson, ring the Gardai.

2. This is entirely false.

And your conclusion is based on what you know to be a lie. That Trump shite doesn't work here

This is entirely true

https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-41736747.html

"Recent media reports suggest that the owner of this company, Secure Accommodation Management, has been paid €10.2m since it was set up in September 2022. Indeed, the Department of Children, Disability and Equality highlighted its huge profits for 2023."

https://sinnfein.ie/news/cab-naming-of-ipas-provider-shows-urgent-need-for-full-examination-of-profiteering-in-provision-of-ipas-accommodation-matt-carthy-td/

Sinn Féin spokesperson on Justice, Home Affairs and Migration, Matt Carthy TD, has said that reports in the Sunday World over the weekend that the government has paid millions for IPAS accommodation, to a company owned by a man currently awaiting sentencing for violent disorder and named by the Criminal Assets Bureau as being linked to the Drogheda gang feud were deeply worrying.

[The setting of the fire at the IPAS Center was down to a dispute between 2 criminal gangs not some "far right" ideology.]

He might get the probation act. This is getting demeaning now. What a wierd hill to die on.

Not weird at all

2 reasons why it's important

(1) The setting of the fire at the IPAS Center was down to a dispute between 2 criminal gangs not some "far right" ideology.

(2) Gangsters/convicted criminals were able to pass the vetting required to run an IPAS center where they received €10 M in taxpayer funded reimbursement.

If the government can't vet Irish people to run an IPAS center how the heck can we trust them to vet the incoming asylum seekers/refugees

Where did you pull that out of ffs

The 2 people arrested for setting the fire are members of the opposing faction in the on going feud

Hands across the divide in their shared hatred of non white foreigners? Much like the Coolock crew hanging out with the loyalist gang bangers in Belfast?

#thefarwhite

So remember the poor kid who got beat up in Tuam last week

The same shower of tramps battered sons of a friend of mine at a teenage disco in Ballinasloe last year

Some people are just cvnts-doesn't mean they're far right or driven by far right ideology

[The setting of the fire at the IPAS Center was down to a dispute between 2 criminal gangs not some "far right" ideology.]

He might get the probation act. This is getting demeaning now. What a wierd hill to die on.

Not weird at all

2 reasons why it's important

(1) The setting of the fire at the IPAS Center was down to a dispute between 2 criminal gangs not some "far right" ideology.

(2) Gangsters/convicted criminals were able to pass the vetting required to run an IPAS center where they received €10 M in taxpayer funded reimbursement.

If the government can't vet Irish people to run an IPAS center how the heck can we trust them to vet the incoming asylum seekers/refugees

Where did you pull that out of ffs

The 2 people arrested for setting the fire are members of the opposing faction in the on going feud