Quick question for the legal people on here.
We are involved in a legal dispute over a boundary with someone who purchased land beside us a few years ago. They initially made direct contact with us, and we went to our solicitor. They then had a solicitor involved very briefly, but over the past year, they have been directly contacting our solicitor with all kinds of letters and emails demanding proof or this and that. This all seems like a play so that they are leeching money from us as we have to pay our solicitors' time, but they have no legal costs.
My query is, can they keep contacting our solicitor directly, or can we insist that any communications to our solicitor go through their solicitor, so at the very least, they are also incurring expenses? It might make them think twice about sending communications/requests to our solicitor.
We are involved in a legal dispute over a boundary with someone who purchased land beside us a few years ago. They initially made direct contact with us, and we went to our solicitor. They then had a solicitor involved very briefly, but over the past year, they have been directly contacting our solicitor with all kinds of letters and emails demanding proof or this and that. This all seems like a play so that they are leeching money from us as we have to pay our solicitors' time, but they have no legal costs.
My query is, can they keep contacting our solicitor directly, or can we insist that any communications to our solicitor go through their solicitor, so at the very least, they are also incurring expenses? It might make them think twice about sending communications/requests to our solicitor.