Quote from: Lowkey on May 15, 2026, 07:18:58 AMThe IHRA definition is here if anyone wants to read it.
https://holocaustremembrance.com/resources/working-definition-antisemitism
The following is an extract from a piece by Norman Finkelstein warning the Labour Party against adopting the IHRA definition. The full piece is here.
https://skwawkbox.org/2018/08/28/excl-finkelstein-critiques-ihra-definition-and-rejects-it-whole/
WHY THE LABOUR PARTY SHOULD NOT ADOPT THE IHRA DEFINITION OR ANY OTHER DEFINITION OF ANTISEMITISM
By Norman G. Finkelstein*
...........The IHRA definition of antisemitism includes 11 illustrative examples. Fully seven of them home in on criticism of Israel. If the Labour Party adopts these taboos, respected scholarship will be suppressed while Israel will become the beneficiary of a pernicious double standard. Consider these examples culled from the IHRA text:
*"Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor." - But, according to Israel's leading historian, Benny Morris, "transfer [i.e., expulsion] was inevitable and inbuilt into Zionism," while according to Israeli writer Ari Shavit, in his widely acclaimed bestseller, My Promised Land, "If Zionism was to be, Lydda could not be." The upshot is, if Israel's founding necessarily entailed ethnic cleansing of the indigenous population, then realization of the Jewish people's right to self-determination must have been a racist endeavor.
*"Applying double standards by requiring of it [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation." - But, far from holding Israel to a more stringent standard, overwhelmingly its critics have targeted Israel's immunity to any standard. For example, since 1979 the UN Security Council has repeatedly condemned Israel's policy of building settlements in occupied Palestinian territory as a "flagrant violation" of international law, while in 2004 the International Court of Justice unanimously declared Israeli settlements "in breach of international law." Yet, Israel persists in its settlement policy, while the UN, although repeatedly imposing sanctions on other member states, has not imposed any on Israel, even as its settlement policy constitutes a war crime and a crime against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
*"Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis." - But Israeli hasbara (propaganda) itself promiscuously exploits the "blood libel" charge (i.e., that Jews murdered Christian children for ritual purposes) in order to silence critics by reversing its sting. Thus, mere mention of Palestinian children killed by Israel typically prompts accusations of a "Global Blood Libel against Israel."
*"Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis." - But, on the one hand, Israelis across the political spectrum freely make such bone-chilling analogies, while, on the other hand, Israel has itself routinely depicted its antagonists, be it Nasser's Egypt or Saddam Hussein's Iraq, be it Iran, Hezbollah, or Hamas, as reincarnations of Hitler and Nazi-like. Indeed, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has—in certifiably mad defiance of every scrap of evidence—declared that Iran might pose an even greater threat to humanity than did Hitler and that not Hitler but a Palestinian leader masterminded the Holocaust.
*"Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel." - But, by representing itself as the Nation-State of the Jewish people, Israel itself collectively implicates Jews in its actions, just as Netanyahu collectively implicates Jews when he touts himself as the "representative of the entire Jewish people".
In sum, these examples of antisemitism allegedly hiding behind criticism of Israel comprise factually accurate depictions by Israel's critics (first bulleted example), factually inaccurate depictions of Israel's critics by its watchdogs (second bulleted example), and questionable practices of which Israel is as, if not more, culpable than its critics (third, fourth, and fifth bulleted examples). If the Labour Party adopts them, it will become a willing dupe of Israeli hasbara; it will disgrace the Party's noble traditions; and it will betray Jeremy Corbyn's promise to set the Party on a new-old path of upholding Truth and Justice, wherever it may lead and whatever the price.
Finkelstein was always a straight talker:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kw7FJ9y8m4M