Things that make you go What the F**k?

[Roesider]

Yes, the poster who dismissed the Cuties furore as "a Qanon conspiracy theory". And now you with your " perfectly valid to harbour strong doubts and suspicions of the motives and authenticity of claims originating from movements like QAnon" apologia.

I don't think you understand the word 'aplogia'.

I simply asked why the poster wanted to have something banned and the proposer was unable to answer. We now apparantly have Netflix showing 'child porn'.

You are jumping aboard a Qanon bandwagon without bothering to do research and then the Qanon trick that anyone who questions you is a paedo apologist.

Try harder, you aren't on 4cham or stormfront.

So you are now the wtf.

What are you going on about? I already answered. There should be no need for any grouping (internet or otherwise) to tell you that films containing pre-teen girls in skimpy clothes with close up body shots is disturbing.

If people want to justify their reason for watching is down to not giving in to qanon then they can continue to convince themselves of that. maybe after their 10th viewing they will start to understand the intellectual arguments behind what the director was attempting to portray. 

The only thing I know about this film is the discussion on this thread. You may be right that it is child porn, although you haven’t offered much of an argument. I’m arguing the principle.

Grown adults can make and watch films/documentaries about disturbing subjects without it serving the purpose of titillation. Did anyone watch Schindler’s List ten times for sexual kicks because it depicts Jewish Holocaust victims stripped naked on their way to the “showers”? Or are most people mature enough to see the scene as a true-to-life depiction of the depravity and inhumanity of the Nazis?

I don't really think there is much of an argument needed. From various media sources we already know the content in the film. If people need to watch 11 year old girls twerk and gyrate to prove their point then enjoy the show.

[Baile Brigín 2]

Yes, the poster who dismissed the Cuties furore as "a Qanon conspiracy theory". And now you with your " perfectly valid to harbour strong doubts and suspicions of the motives and authenticity of claims originating from movements like QAnon" apologia.

I don't think you understand the word 'aplogia'.

I simply asked why the poster wanted to have something banned and the proposer was unable to answer. We now apparantly have Netflix showing 'child porn'.

You are jumping aboard a Qanon bandwagon without bothering to do research and then the Qanon trick that anyone who questions you is a paedo apologist.

Try harder, you aren't on 4cham or stormfront.

So you are now the wtf.

What are you going on about? I already answered. There should be no need for any grouping (internet or otherwise) to tell you that films containing pre-teen girls in skimpy clothes with close up body shots is disturbing.

If people want to justify their reason for watching is down to not giving in to qanon then they can continue to convince themselves of that. maybe after their 10th viewing they will start to understand the intellectual arguments behind what the director was attempting to portray. 

The only thing I know about this film is the discussion on this thread. You may be right that it is child porn, although you haven’t offered much of an argument. I’m arguing the principle.

Grown adults can make and watch films/documentaries about disturbing subjects without it serving the purpose of titillation. Did anyone watch Schindler’s List ten times for sexual kicks because it depicts Jewish Holocaust victims stripped naked on their way to the “showers”? Or are most people mature enough to see the scene as a true-to-life depiction of the depravity and inhumanity of the Nazis?

I don't really think there is much of an argument needed. From various media sources we already know the content in the film. If people need to watch 11 year old girls twerk and gyrate to prove their point then enjoy the show.

Various media sources?

You do get that the show is criticiding the likes of you

[Square Ball]

I see that the PSNI have scooped the dickhead that may have let a young child to drive his lorry along the M1. 🤯 Wab

https://www.belfastlive.co.uk/news/belfast-news/young-boy-driving-lorry-video-18919244#ICID=Android_BelfastLiveNewsApp_AppShare

What the f**k is wrong with people?

I don’t know what is more stupid: allowing a lad to drive a lorry or putting the video of it online.

There's another video doing the rounds of a wee girl driving a lorry as well. The Da is in the video.

Thick as shít.

Seen, what the f**k is wrong with these people?

Wab number 2 has been arrested and released

[Eamonnca1]

Yes, the poster who dismissed the Cuties furore as "a Qanon conspiracy theory". And now you with your " perfectly valid to harbour strong doubts and suspicions of the motives and authenticity of claims originating from movements like QAnon" apologia.

I don't think you understand the word 'aplogia'.

I simply asked why the poster wanted to have something banned and the proposer was unable to answer. We now apparantly have Netflix showing 'child porn'.

You are jumping aboard a Qanon bandwagon without bothering to do research and then the Qanon trick that anyone who questions you is a paedo apologist.

Try harder, you aren't on 4cham or stormfront.

So you are now the wtf.

What are you going on about? I already answered. There should be no need for any grouping (internet or otherwise) to tell you that films containing pre-teen girls in skimpy clothes with close up body shots is disturbing.

If people want to justify their reason for watching is down to not giving in to qanon then they can continue to convince themselves of that. maybe after their 10th viewing they will start to understand the intellectual arguments behind what the director was attempting to portray. 

The only thing I know about this film is the discussion on this thread. You may be right that it is child porn, although you haven’t offered much of an argument. I’m arguing the principle.

Grown adults can make and watch films/documentaries about disturbing subjects without it serving the purpose of titillation. Did anyone watch Schindler’s List ten times for sexual kicks because it depicts Jewish Holocaust victims stripped naked on their way to the “showers”? Or are most people mature enough to see the scene as a true-to-life depiction of the depravity and inhumanity of the Nazis?

I don't really think there is much of an argument needed. From various media sources we already know the content in the film. If people need to watch 11 year old girls twerk and gyrate to prove their point then enjoy the show.

Various media sources?

You do get that the show is criticiding the likes of you

The American right has lost its mind over this Q-Anon pedophilia stuff. I've seen elements of it from the commentariat on the right, people are going around with an unfounded and disgusting accusation that Joe Biden is a pedophile. Utterly disgusting. But they'll happily vote for a creepy old guy who talks about his own daughter in sexcual terms and once said of a pre-teen girl "in a few years I'll be dating her."

[five points]

The American right has lost its mind over this Q-Anon pedophilia stuff. I've seen elements of it from the commentariat on the right, people are going around with an unfounded and disgusting accusation that Joe Biden is a pedophile. Utterly disgusting. But they'll happily vote for a creepy old guy who talks about his own daughter in sexcual terms and once said of a pre-teen girl "in a few years I'll be dating her."

If there weren't quite a number of videos of him fondling and sniffing little girls at public events, these goons would have nothing.

[sid waddell]

Yes, the poster who dismissed the Cuties furore as "a Qanon conspiracy theory". And now you with your " perfectly valid to harbour strong doubts and suspicions of the motives and authenticity of claims originating from movements like QAnon" apologia.

I don't think you understand the word 'aplogia'.

I simply asked why the poster wanted to have something banned and the proposer was unable to answer. We now apparantly have Netflix showing 'child porn'.

You are jumping aboard a Qanon bandwagon without bothering to do research and then the Qanon trick that anyone who questions you is a paedo apologist.

Try harder, you aren't on 4cham or stormfront.

So you are now the wtf.

What are you going on about? I already answered. There should be no need for any grouping (internet or otherwise) to tell you that films containing pre-teen girls in skimpy clothes with close up body shots is disturbing.

If people want to justify their reason for watching is down to not giving in to qanon then they can continue to convince themselves of that. maybe after their 10th viewing they will start to understand the intellectual arguments behind what the director was attempting to portray. 

The only thing I know about this film is the discussion on this thread. You may be right that it is child porn, although you haven’t offered much of an argument. I’m arguing the principle.

Grown adults can make and watch films/documentaries about disturbing subjects without it serving the purpose of titillation. Did anyone watch Schindler’s List ten times for sexual kicks because it depicts Jewish Holocaust victims stripped naked on their way to the “showers”? Or are most people mature enough to see the scene as a true-to-life depiction of the depravity and inhumanity of the Nazis?

I don't really think there is much of an argument needed. From various media sources we already know the content in the film. If people need to watch 11 year old girls twerk and gyrate to prove their point then enjoy the show.

Various media sources?

You do get that the show is criticiding the likes of you

The American right has lost its mind over this Q-Anon pedophilia stuff. I've seen elements of it from the commentariat on the right, people are going around with an unfounded and disgusting accusation that Joe Biden is a pedophile. Utterly disgusting. But they'll happily vote for a creepy old guy who talks about his own daughter in sexcual terms and once said of a pre-teen girl "in a few years I'll be dating her."

Yet they completely ignore that a court case was filed against Trump for the alleged rape of a 13 year old girl with Epstein and that Trump is almost certainly a serial rapist and certainly a known sexual predator

The American right, and indeed the right anywhere, gives not a flying shit about victims of paedophilia, rape or sexual assault, they openly indulge those crimes

Not a peep out of the American right about systematic forced hysterectomies on immigrant women at ICE camps:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/14/ice-detainees-hysterectomies-medical-neglect-irwin-georgia

What comes after forced sterilisations?

Mass death is the answer that history provides for us

[hardstation]

There are 3 threads at the top of this board and it doesn’t matter which you click on, you get the same thread.

[five points]

There are 3 threads at the top of this board and it doesn’t matter which you click on, you get the same thread.

 

[Eamonnca1]

[Roesider]

Do you watch the show yourself?

[Eamonnca1]

Nope, don't have time for a whole lot of TV. I just enjoy riling conservatives.

[Baile Brigín 2]

Do you watch the show yourself?

Did you? And if not what qualifies you to have an opinion on it?

[Roesider]

Do you watch the show yourself?

Did you? And if not what qualifies you to have an opinion on it?

No. Have you watched it?

[Baile Brigín 2]

Do you watch the show yourself?

Did you? And if not what qualifies you to have an opinion on it?

No. Have you watched it?

No, not even slightly interested. Thats why I asked you what your problem with it is. I woild never dream of critiquing something I haven't seen.

[Milltown Row2]

Dance mums was on flat out in my house! The kids at the time loved it and my missus loved the bitching going on!