The person interviewed on the Boston Tapes said that Jean McConville was an informer. The same person said Adams ordered her execution. So its either OK to put both in the public domain or neither of them.
Must be 100% true then!
I would say it's very credible, multiple sources with little differences in their accounts and seems to stand up to robust scrutiny.
The Brits could make things a lot easier by releasing their files. For some reason they are holding back on the Divis files when most of the rest have been made available, the McConvilles don't seem to be pushing too hard on this. I think you have to question that.
Except academic scrutiny as the Boston Tapes are now being used as an exercise in how not to conduct an oral history.
Also judicial scrutiny when a judge says the tapes are completely inadmissible in court.
But apart from that yeah it's pretty credible 
Did you not say something about being smart??!
What are you blathering on about?
The accounts that Price and Hughes gave corroborate each other, the equipment Hughes says was located at McConville's apartment fit in with the type of equipment used by British intelligence at that time. The British government have refused to release files relating to the Divis Flats specifically at that time. The McConville family are applying little if any pressure to release this files which would certainly help their stance if their was nothing in them that suggests Jean McConville was an informer. That is the robust scrutiny their accounts of events stand up to.
They are consistent in their stories, they are accurate in the type of equipment used, they made admissions or knowledge of the murder and interrogation.
What part of their stories do you have an issue with? Don't be like the other coward and actually address the question.
Says the petulant child demonising a murdered woman and her family whom he knows nothing about except for hearsay, all under the guise of anonymity and he has the gall to call anyone a coward. The tapes were inadmissible for a reason, you have no evidence she was a tout, and you are firing this term about in an effort to justify the fact she was murdered, you are a heinous, cowardly sc**bag of an individual.
Loads of hot air and personal insults and zero substance and you have temerity to call me a petulant child.
There is plenty of substance and circumstances to support that Jean McConville was an informer. My own view is that with the information available and the accounts of Price and Hughes is that she was an informer. Price admitted to taking part in her murder.
I'm not justifying anything, I'm merely stating that there is more than a credible theory that she was an informer and that is why she was murdereed, right or wrong that's what happened informers.
Now maybe if you had the courage to engage your brain than resorting to pontificating, foul language and personal insults you might be to construct a coherent argument to support your views.
