RG at arms length

[David McKeown]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Quite right I should believe everything I am told and ignore all evidence that calls it into question.  Does that mean I have to find both the allegations and the denials credible?

I dont find the allegations incredible either I just think that all available evidence should be considered

[David McKeown]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

If only I were a solicitor

[Hand of God]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

I don't think you're credible, as this is a second name on the board you've come back as, that I know of

Yap yap yap as usual from you.

Keep deflecting from the bit where you disbelieve domestic violence victims as a standard. If you had any gumption you'd answer the question posed to you as we all know you have no problem answering things on behalf of others without the facts.

[Hand of God]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

I have little interest in debating whether he should be brought to trial or convicted. There's a whole different threshold at play there.

It's about whether Gallagher should be allowed operate in the GAA and certain people are hiding behind legal basis when it's clearly a moral one.

[Milltown Row2]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

I don't think you're credible, as this is a second name on the board you've come back as, that I know of

Yap yap yap as usual from you.

Keep deflecting from the bit where you disbelieve domestic violence victims as a standard. If you had any gumption you'd answer the question posed to you as we all know you have no problem answering things on behalf of others without the facts.

You are different level. I've answered many times, but you blind!

I've asked you countless times to put up where I've stated it. The function is there, you highlight the quotes where I've said it. Even you can do it.

If you don't then you are a WUM, which is scandalous, using a families distress to get attention, sad

[David McKeown]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

I have little interest in debating whether he should be brought to trial or convicted. There's a whole different threshold at play there.

It's about whether Gallagher should be allowed operate in the GAA and certain people are hiding behind legal basis when it's clearly a moral one.

To get to what's right morally you need to establish the facts.  There is a moral obligation to do that as well. No one has said RG needs tried and convicted despite your best efforts to twist things that way.  No one is hiding behind legal basis 

[93-DY-SAM]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

If only I were a solicitor

Ah Jaysus man - what do you do? Lol

[quit yo jibbajabba]

Looks like we're all gonna have to find ourselves a new solicitor

Damm u David

[trueblue1234]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

I have little interest in debating whether he should be brought to trial or convicted. There's a whole different threshold at play there.

It's about whether Gallagher should be allowed operate in the GAA and certain people are hiding behind legal basis when it's clearly a moral one.

Every thread you touch turns to sh!te. I really hope, for your sake, you manage better in the real word because you are just a pollutant on here that is only interested in destroying discussion not engaging in it. A complete dose.

[tbrick18]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

I have little interest in debating whether he should be brought to trial or convicted. There's a whole different threshold at play there.

It's about whether Gallagher should be allowed operate in the GAA and certain people are hiding behind legal basis when it's clearly a moral one.

There's the issue.
You are so convinced by your own point of view you can't give any consideration to the possibility that this is not a black and white issue and that your opinion may be wrong.
You strike me as one of those people who believes everything you read on the internet as fact OR you have some direct involvement with this issue, or very similar one. If the latter is the case, I genuinely hope you get a resolution to it.

Can you not accept at least the possibility that RG is being wronged here? However unlikely you feel that to be, it's still a possibility. In much the same way where you say that if JB thinks RG "could" have done the things he's accused of, his ex-wife "could" have made it up. The criminal investigations and lack of charges being brought give some weight to the that, or at least some weight behind the allegations not being as "credible" as you would have everyone believe.

You have formed what you believe to be a factual opinion without considering all the possibilities.

I think it's fair to say that everyone else on this board, on this particular issue, are all in agreement that if he did it he should be gone from the GAA, but if we can't be certain then it's unsafe to go on the solo run approach JB took as it opens the door to future issues being wrongly managed.

[JoG2]

You boys are in big bother now 🙈🙉

[AustinPowers]

It's like Groundhog Day in here

[quit yo jibbajabba]

It's like Groundhog Day in here

Sure what would you know about films 😜

[Hand of God]

So you don't find the allegations credible.

That's your problem right there.

Imagine a solicitor looking at it through a clinical legal lens?

The bastard.

I have little interest in debating whether he should be brought to trial or convicted. There's a whole different threshold at play there.

It's about whether Gallagher should be allowed operate in the GAA and certain people are hiding behind legal basis when it's clearly a moral one.

Every thread you touch turns to sh!te. I really hope, for your sake, you manage better in the real word because you are just a pollutant on here that is only interested in destroying discussion not engaging in it. A complete dose.

I'm a pollutant. Sure.

I just happen to the disagree with 50+ right wing conservative bores and neo-liberals fanatics who hold some very dark positions on things like domestic violence, western supremacy.

It could never ever be your world outlook that is the issue....

[gallsman]

Neo-liberals. Lol.